![]() |
|
|
|||
|
What is Sen. Lautenburg (D-NJ) talking about?
I'm a Dem, and I would like to hear a supportive statement.
__________________
Any man who can render himself unconscious with a pretzel isn't smart enough to lead the free world. |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Anyway, he refers to people, like Cheney or Bush, who have never fought in war (when in some cases, they could have), yet they seem quite eager to use military force for their own purposes. These hawks, some say, never fought in combat, so its easy for them to send our troops off. |
|
|||
|
I believe that Sec. Powell has said alot about those who havn't served. Personally, I don't think that this qualifies you as a bad judge of action. But, I wonder about motives...
Define motives...
__________________
Any man who can render himself unconscious with a pretzel isn't smart enough to lead the free world. |
|
|||
|
.."All mouth and no trousers".....All talk and no action...
A chickenhawk likes to talk tough but has never actually been in a fight themselves....
__________________
The last time this country mixed politics with religion, people got burned at the stake. |
|
|||
|
Ideological goals, like democratization of the Mid East
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Give me a better critique.
__________________
Any man who can render himself unconscious with a pretzel isn't smart enough to lead the free world. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I would agree that there was no "need" to use force. This was a war of choice to fulfill the ideological goals of the neocons. |
|
|||
|
To change the world. Seriously.
The idea has been to change the entire ME and democratize. They might be noble endeavors, but they're unrealistic and ideological, utopian in nature. Again, using the military if you can avoid it is the crux of the matter. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|