Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 06:59 PM
Printer2 Printer2 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,322
Printer2 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,480
Default f

Quote:
disagree about them being any good as entertainers i just think they have conections and always help their own fellow jews because they control the media. realy. i am sick of these jews on television i dont even watch none of these shows: simpsons, mad tv, crank yankers snl ok some are great, but all this crap too many to name, and all these jews no talent whatsoever i got them coming out of my butt.... too bad i dont know every single person on television if hes a jew or not, but i dont think most of the good ones are jews.... quite the contrary, i think most non jews are much better because the only way they can succeed is with pure talent as opposed to a jew he has connections.... some are probably good though, but most just suck i think.........
Well you may hate them, but a hugely dispropritonate amoutn of directors, actors, writers, producers, editors, and composers are Jewish. And most Americans so far have not had too many problems with them.

Quote:
2) I disagree with Printer. I've met some Jews who are great people to know, others who just think they're great people to know. The good ones act more like Christians than Christians, the bad ones the way uber-Christians think atheists act. It's just like any religion in that regard. But I actually like the concept of Christianity better, because it is (on paper anyway) inclusive.
I'm not talking about the actual individuals. Individuals come and go. I'm talking about the actual ideas that make the religion. I think the Jewish ideas are much better, I could list them if you want.

Plus, what do you mean by "inclusive." As in, they except more people?

Well, honestly, that really doesnt mean much to me. I could just argue that that means its much easier to be a good religious christian than jew... but I won't argue that.

Quote:
zionists i believe are jews. smart jews, but not inovative or hard working or gods people, simply SCUM. i believe zionists sacraficed many jews to achieve their goals. just like communists sacraficed many russians to achieve theirs. evil does not have it's kind.
Well, somehow those zionists were able to come from 2000 years of persecution to create the most successful and rich nation in the middle east. hmm....
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 07:15 PM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,253
Default '

Quote:
Originally Posted by Printer2";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
disagree about them being any good as entertainers i just think they have conections and always help their own fellow jews because they control the media. realy. i am sick of these jews on television i dont even watch none of these shows: simpsons, mad tv, crank yankers snl ok some are great, but all this crap too many to name, and all these jews no talent whatsoever i got them coming out of my butt.... too bad i dont know every single person on television if hes a jew or not, but i dont think most of the good ones are jews.... quite the contrary, i think most non jews are much better because the only way they can succeed is with pure talent as opposed to a jew he has connections.... some are probably good though, but most just suck i think.........
Well you may hate them, but a hugely dispropritonate amoutn of directors, actors, writers, producers, editors, and composers are Jewish. And most Americans so far have not had too many problems with them.
no problems on media. in reality most people i think watch that crap no more then i watch my butt... but i could be wrong ok......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Printer2";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
zionists i believe are jews. smart jews, but not inovative or hard working or gods people, simply SCUM. i believe zionists sacraficed many jews to achieve their goals. just like communists sacraficed many russians to achieve theirs. evil does not have it's kind.
Well, somehow those zionists were able to come from 2000 years of persecution to create the most successful and rich nation in the middle east. hmm....
correct.
by creating WW1 and WW2, deception, terrorism and lies.
that's how.

and there are those who understand it and there are those who do not. and because they control the media, anyone who understands and speaks out against their trickery is imediately called "racist, anti-semite, modern hitler, etc...
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 07:26 PM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 16,334
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 109,433
Default Touchy Ground

[quote="Printer2";p="167422"]
Quote:

Plus, what do you mean by "inclusive." As in, they except more people?
This is one of those things I hate to point out because it usually automatically makes one an antisemite to point it out but: Judaism is on paper racist, or at least ethnocentric. Jews are the chosen people and the rest of us are Gentiles. I do not necessarily feel comfortable in the awkward position of being around a guy talking about how rotten and evil the "gentiles" are and how it will be for the best when the "gentiles" are all put in their place, when I am one of those "gentiles". I acknowledge not all Jews are like that, but if they are it is justified by the faith of Judaism. Christians on the other hand are supposed to be out to save all people (as annoying as this might be) and consider all people to be God's people (at least potentially). The other reason I like Christianity better is because it focuses on spiritual guidelines rather than strict laws (since we are talking about the faiths and not the individuals). It focuses on love rather than on rules.
I'd rather deal with Christians who annoy the living hell out of me because they fear for my soul than around people who consider me a lesser being, someone God doesn't care about. Now, granted, most Jews I've met tend to be rather thoughtful of "gentiles" and don't seem to consider us lesser hominids and some Christians don't believe they should raise a finger to help a non-Christian. But if we are looking at the faith as opposed to the people, yes, all of us "gentiles" are a lesser race deserving of God's wrath and nothing else. There are no Good Samaritans in the Old Testament.

Personally I think the Eastern religions are better than either of them. But when it really comes down to it, who cares. Either a person is nice or a person is a p***k.

And granted, I know absolutely nothing about the Q'ballah (even how to spell it off the top of my head). So maybe it's different.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 07:33 PM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,253
Default "Jews are the chosen people" ???????????????????????????????

Quote:
Judaism is on paper racist, or at least ethnocentric. Jews are the chosen people and the rest of us are Gentiles
ok. see i heard about this. but i havent found it on paper, probably because i didnt look well enough(only http://www.convert.org/differ.htm part lol). and if this is, then here we go......... judasim is a racist religion.....

i must admit i should read more and talk less.....
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 07:59 PM
Printer2 Printer2 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,322
Printer2 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,480
Default f

Quote:
by creating WW1 and WW2
Last time I checked it was the Austrians and Germans who declared war on others.... both times.

Quote:
and there are those who understand it and there are those who do not. and because they control the media, anyone who understands and speaks out against their trickery is imediately called "racist, anti-semite, modern hitler, etc...
Anyone who viciously and maliciously attacks jews 24/7 is called anti-semitic. Buchanon attacks Israel and Jews, but he's not considered anti-semitic, cause he hasnt devoted his life to it.

Quote:
This is one of those things I hate to point out because it usually automatically makes one an antisemite to point it out but:
Don't worry, I know you dont hate Jews. Feel free to say what u want.

Quote:
Judaism is on paper racist, or at least ethnocentric. Jews are the chosen people and the rest of us are Gentiles.
Actually, when all these ideas of superiority were created, they had nothing to do with the blood, only the ideas. Jews believed they had better ideas, and since they followed the ideas, they were superior. Everyone always agrees with this line of logic, no matter what situation.

Quote:
I do not necessarily feel comfortable in the awkward position of being around a guy talking about how rotten and evil the "gentiles" are and how it will be for the best when the "gentiles" are all put in their place, when I am one of those "gentiles".
Jews dont really do that. What I really like Judaism, is that unlike Christianity an Islam, Jews dont preach. They dont walk around saying that they're better than everyone (EVEN if its technically in the texts). No one has ever actually believed that. Jews dont walk around as misisonaries telling others they're wrong and will go to hell. In fact, they;re unique because they say anyone, no matter what their faith, will/can get to heaven.

Quote:
Christians on the other hand are supposed to be out to save all people (as annoying as this might be) and consider all people to be God's people (at least potentially). The other reason I like Christianity better is because it focuses on spiritual guidelines rather than strict laws (since we are talking about the faiths and not the individuals). It focuses on love rather than on rules.
Yes, but I dont like the Christian aspect of the focus on heaven and salvation. Its all about heaven heaven heavn. Thats all that matters. Good deeds arent as important as faith (which is true according to the faith).

Where as Jews say what matters is your actions, and faith counts for zip in comparison. Also, Jews focus on the world right here right now, not on whats next. Which I personally think is a much better idea.

Where as Jews say live and let live, Christians say live and tell other how to live.

Quote:
I'd rather deal with Christians who annoy the living hell out of me because they fear for my soul than around people who consider me a lesser being
But thats just not historically true. For 1500 years Christians wondered the earth (*)(*)(*)(*)ing everyone who disagreed with them, calling everyone else the devil and satn's child. You know this to be true. So dont give me hoopla about Jews walking around thinking themselves better you, its the complete reversal.

Quote:
someone God doesn't care about
Quote:
But if we are looking at the faith as opposed to the people, yes, all of us "gentiles" are a lesser race deserving of God's wrath and nothing else. There are no Good Samaritans in the Old Testament
Jews invented the idea of G-d caring about each person.

But the problem is that the entire source of these arguments is like one or two quotes in the old testament and something in the talmud (which isnt even G-d's work). In reality, if you ask any Rabbi if Judaism considers Jews superior they will all always say no, that Judaism is completely against that.

In my opinion, the Christian and Muslim faiths are way more into the whole "though art inferior thing." And the fact that they belive only their faiths will land us into heaven is proof alone of that.

Quote:
Personally I think the Eastern religions are better than either of them
True, Budhism kicks everyone's butt.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 08:06 PM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 16,334
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 109,433
Default Rikitz, you're losing the point

Just because there is an implicit nature of ethnocenticism in the Old Testament, I don't think you should go where I think you're going. Jews don't have to be racist and from what I can tell most aren't (at least not in this country- some Jewish friends of mine have said many people in Israel view them as lesser people- there are big differences in orthodox, conservative, and reformed Jews). And I think the "God's chosen" element is offset by the stories that are about being nice to strangers, because it could be God in disguise. I don't think that was much a consolation to the Canaanites, but hell, the Christians cheer on their destruction as well.
Philosophically, I guess that's my biggest difference with Judaism and that puts me at odds with Christianity and Islam as well. The whole Old Testament looks to me like a history book with a bunch of rationalization and retrospect thrown in to make "God's chosen people" look heroic (not unlike most history books). I see very little in the way of a coherent moral philosophy. But that's not important now.
Good God, Rikitz, if converting to Judaism will make you drop this zionistphobia thing, by all means do it. The touchy part about this all is that the ethnocentric nature of the Old Testament helped to lead to these silly conspiracy theories which helped lead to Nazis which are a much worse form of exclusion. At least the ethnocentric among the Jews just leave people alone and don't slaughter them (except maybe the Canaanites, but that was a long time ago). As much as I'd rather have people who think their God cares about me around than people who think I am an afterthought of their God, I'd rather have the latter group around leaving me alone than the nastier people who kill and oppress using peoples' irrational fears of conspiracy.

Like I said. Some people are nice. Others are p***ks. Others are oppressive, murderous monstrosities (though I suppose by my own logic from the last post, I have to assume there are some nice Nazis out there- (*)(*)(*)(*). There goes my whole argument.).
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 08:06 PM
Printer2 Printer2 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,322
Printer2 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,480
Default f

JavaBlack, here some examples of differences between Judaism and Christianity from Wikipedia, plus it has a much better explanation of the "chosen" people thing.

Quote:
To religious Jews, Jewish peoplehood is closely tied to their relationship with God, and thus has a strong theological component. This relationship is encapsulated in the notion that Jews are a chosen people. Although many non-Jews have taken this as a sign of arrogance or exclusivity, Jewish scholars and theologians have emphasized that a special relationship between Jews and God does not in any way preclude other nations having their own relationship with God. In this sense, "chosen" means chosen to undertake a duty, a responsibility or a role, rather than chosen as higher status or more deserving. For strictly observant Jews, being "chosen" fundamentally means that it was Gods wish that a group of people would exist in a covenant with Him, and would be bound to obey a certain set of laws (see Torah and halakha) as a duty of their covenant. They view their divine purpose as being ideally a "light upon the nations" and a "holy people" (ie, a people who live their lives fully in accordance with Divine will), rather than "the one path to God".
Quote:
Jews hold that other nations and peoples are not required (or expected) to obey Jewish law. The only laws Judaism believes are automatically binding on other nations are known as the Seven Laws of Noah (which are humanitarian rather than religious). Thus, as a national religion, Judaism has takes as read that others may have their own, different, paths to God (or holiness, or "salvation").
Quote:
Christianity, on the other hand, is characterized by its claim to universality, which marks a significant break from Jewish identity and thought. As a religion claiming universality, Christianity has had to define itself in relation with religions that make radically different claims about gods. Christians believe that Christianity represents the fulfillment of God's promise to Abraham and the nation of Israel, that Israel would be a blessing to all nations.
Quote:
Judaism teaches that the purpose of the Torah is to show that good deeds are considered in holiness as much or even more important than belief in God, and that both are required of people. An old Jewish saying captures this sentiment, "If you hear the Messiah has come, and you are doing a job, finish the job properly, then go and see." Although the Torah commands Jews to believe in God, Jews see belief in God as a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for a Jewish life. The quintessential verbal expression of Judaism is the Shema Yisrael, the statement that the God of the Bible is their God, and that this God is unique and one. The quintessential physical expression of Judaism is behaving in accordance with the 613 Mitzvot (the commandments specified in the Torah), and thus live one's life in God's ways.

Thus fundamentally in Judaism, one is enjoined to bring holiness into life (with the guidance of Gods laws), rather than removing oneself from life to be holy.

Much of Christianity also teaches that God wants people to perform good works, but all branches hold that good works will not lead to salvation. Some Christian denominations hold that salvation depends upon transformational faith in Jesus which expresses itself in good works as a testament (or witness) to ones faith for others to see (primarily Eastern Orthodox Christianity and Roman Catholicism), while others (including most Protestants) hold that faith alone is necessary for salvation. However, the difference is not as great as it seems, because it really hinges on the definition of "faith" used. The first group generally uses the term "faith" to mean "intellectual and heartfelt assent and submission." Such a faith will not be salvific until a person has allowed it to effect a life transforming conversion (turning towards God) in their being (see ontological faith). The Christians that hold to "salvation by faith alone" (also called by its Latin name "sola fide") define faith as being implicitly ontological--mere intellectual assent is not termed "faith" by these groups. Faith, then, is life-transforming by definition.

A practical outcome of this difference is the attitudes of the two religions to death bed conversions. According to most forms of classical Christianity, one may lead an evil life, but on one's death one may repent for one's sins, accept Jesus as Christian dogma teaches, and then that person will be rewarded with a heavenly afterlife by God; this will be the same heavenly paradise that a comparatively less sinful person would receive. In contrast, all forms of Judaism teach that God judges a person based on their whole lifetime of actions and beliefs, and that deathbed conversions are therefore meaningless and have minimal effect on God's view of their life.
In both religions, one's offenses against the will of God are called sin (in Christianity the full name is "actual sin"). These sins can be thoughts, words, or deeds.

Christianity categorizes sins into various groups. A wounding of the relationship with God is often called venial sin; a complete rupture of the relationship with God is often called mortal sin. Without salvation from sin (see below), a person's separation from God is permanent, causing such a person to enter Hell in the afterlife.

Quote:
Original Sin is a slightly different concept in Christianity, it is not part of Jewish belief or philosophy. Original sin refers to the idea that the sin of Adam and Eve's disobedience (sin "at the origin") has passed on a spiritual heritage, so to speak. Christians teach that human beings inherit a corrupted or damaged human nature in which the tendency to do bad is greater than it would have been otherwise, so much so that human nature would not be capable now of participating in the afterlife with God. This is not a matter of being "guilty" of anything; each person is only personally guilty of their own actual sins. However, this understanding of original sin is what lies behind the Christian emphasis on the need for spiritual salvation from a spiritual Saviour, who can forgive and set aside sin even though humans are not inherently pure and worthy of such salvation. St. Paul in Romans and First Corinthians placed special emphasis on this doctrine, and stressed that belief in Jesus would allow Christians to overcome death and attain salvation in the hereafter.

Judaism teaches that humans are born morally neutral; Jews have no concept of Original Sin, and do not accept it. Instead, Judaism affirms that people are born with a yetzer hatov, (literally, "the eye to good", in some views, a tendency towards goodness, in others, a tendency towards having a productive life and a tendency to be concerned with others) and with a yetzer hara, or concupiscence (literally "the eye to evil", in some views, a tendency towards evil, and in others, a tendency towards base or animal behaviour and a tendency to be selfish.) Because sin is conceived for the most part in terms of a confused heart or wrongful actions, in Judaism it is believed, all human beings have free will and can choose the path in life that they will take. There is always a "way back" if a person wills it. (Although texts mention certain categories for whom the way back will be exceedingly hard, such as the slanderer, and the malicious person)
Quote:
The Christian view is very well defined - every human is a sinner, and nothing but being saved by God's grace (and not through any merit of ones own actions) can change the (*)(*)(*)(*)atory sentence to salvation. There is a judgement after death, and Christ will return to judge the living and dead. Those positively judged will be saved and live in God's presence in heaven, those who are negatively judged will be cast to eternal hell (or in some versions, annihilated).

Jewish teaching is somewhat ambivalent on Judgement. Initially indeed there was no such concept in Judaism, however over time, and especially as exposed to other cultures' concept that every wrong must be somehow balanced by punishment in the end, and vice versa, a mixture of concepts and philosophies entered Judaism. At heart though, Jews do not look for an afterlife as a reward of motivation. The reward for a good life is simply the pleasure it gives God, and the rightness of doing ones duty and living a holy life in his ways. Little emphasis is given in Jewish life to the struggle for a place in the afterlife.
Quote:
Judaism is not an evangelistic religion. Orthodox Judaism in fact deliberately makes it very difficult to convert and become a Jew, and requires a significant and full-time effort in living, study, righteousness and conduct over several years. The final decision is by no means a foregone conclusion. A person cannot become Jewish by marrying a Jew, or by joining a synagogue, nor by any degree of involvement in the community or religion, but only by explicitly undertaking (under supervision) a formal and intense work over years aimed towards that goal. Some less strict versions of Judaism have made this process somewhat easier but it is still far from common.
If you actually read all this, its actually quite interesting, I just dont see how anyone, regardless of their espective religion, can consider Christian views to be more logical, thoughful and just generally better than the Jewish ones.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 08:14 PM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 16,334
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 109,433
Default Printer, I think you won me over in this argument

Quote:
Originally Posted by Printer2";p=&quot View Post
when all these ideas of superiority were created, they had nothing to do with the blood, only the ideas. Jews believed they had better ideas, and since they followed the ideas, they were superior. Everyone always agrees with this line of logic, no matter what situation.

Quote:
I do not necessarily feel comfortable in the awkward position of being around a guy talking about how rotten and evil the "gentiles" are and how it will be for the best when the "gentiles" are all put in their place, when I am one of those "gentiles".
Jews dont really do that. What I really like Judaism, is that unlike Christianity an Islam, Jews dont preach. They dont walk around saying that they're better than everyone (EVEN if its technically in the texts). No one has ever actually believed that. Jews dont walk around as misisonaries telling others they're wrong and will go to hell. In fact, they;re unique because they say anyone, no matter what their faith, will/can get to heaven.

Quote:
Christians on the other hand are supposed to be out to save all people (as annoying as this might be) and consider all people to be God's people (at least potentially). The other reason I like Christianity better is because it focuses on spiritual guidelines rather than strict laws (since we are talking about the faiths and not the individuals). It focuses on love rather than on rules.
Yes, but I dont like the Christian aspect of the focus on heaven and salvation. Its all about heaven heaven heavn. Thats all that matters. Good deeds arent as important as faith (which is true according to the faith).

Where as Jews say what matters is your actions, and faith counts for zip in comparison. Also, Jews focus on the world right here right now, not on whats next. Which I personally think is a much better idea.

Where as Jews say live and let live, Christians say live and tell other how to live.

Quote:
I'd rather deal with Christians who annoy the living hell out of me because they fear for my soul than around people who consider me a lesser being
But thats just not historically true. For 1500 years Christians wondered the earth (*)(*)(*)(*)ing everyone who disagreed with them, calling everyone else the devil and satn's child. You know this to be true. So dont give me hoopla about Jews walking around thinking themselves better you, its the complete reversal.

Quote:
someone God doesn't care about
Quote:
But if we are looking at the faith as opposed to the people, yes, all of us "gentiles" are a lesser race deserving of God's wrath and nothing else. There are no Good Samaritans in the Old Testament
Jews invented the idea of G-d caring about each person.

But the problem is that the entire source of these arguments is like one or two quotes in the old testament and something in the talmud (which isnt even G-d's work). In reality, if you ask any Rabbi if Judaism considers Jews superior they will all always say no, that Judaism is completely against that.

In my opinion, the Christian and Muslim faiths are way more into the whole "though art inferior thing." And the fact that they belive only their faiths will land us into heaven is proof alone of that.

Quote:
Personally I think the Eastern religions are better than either of them
True, Budhism kicks everyone's butt.
I guess you have a point. If I were to go by what most of the Jews I've met are like, these arguments make sense. And I agree with you about the shortcomings of Christianity. Though Hell irritates me even more than Heaven, such a ridiculous concept. I've always wanted to talk to a rabbi at some point, but haven't yet had the opportunity. As it happens, the only Jews who ever talked religion with me were the racist ones. Usually we talk about other things, important things like good beer. Still I have a hard time comparing the two religions because I tend to focus on how people act. And there are so many types of Christians that I can't tell who we're talking about when we say Christians. So, yes, it's best to just go with the Buddhists.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 08:23 PM
JavaBlack's Avatar
JavaBlack JavaBlack is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 16,334
usa us michigan
JavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond reputeJavaBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 109,433
Default I can see how...

You see, when I read the New Testament, I never had a preacher telling me how to interpret it. I was raised without religion. And I kind of fell asleep through the parts that weren't either gospels or attributed to Paul. And Revelations always struck me as more an interesting story that always seems like it's coming true than a real book. Later I'd read the book Lost Christianities (an interesting read) and find that many of the parts I ignored were added in for political reasons or edited for them. Personally I think I got it right and the Christians are wrong. We are after all supposed to get inspiration from the Holy Spirit and I didn't have some preacher getting in the way. What I got out of it is love other people, treat them as you'd like to be treated if you were them, be forgiving, don't get too caught up in your worldly troubles, help the unfortunate, and keep the faith and walk strong. St. Paul or Jesus would say that there is no such thing as faith without works. I really don't know where the Christians get their ideas. Oh yeah. From preachers. I never did have much use for preachers.
I guess it's because I look for moral philosophy in holy books. When I want facts about the cosmos I read Scientific American.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2005, 08:30 PM
Printer2 Printer2 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,322
Printer2 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 13,480
Default f

I argue live and let live. If there is a G-d and a heaven, I doubt he cares what religion you choose, just so long as you're a good person. I concede that some religions offer a better way of getting there, but hey, whatever.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden