Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2005, 07:18 PM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default WHY I, AS A PATRIOT WANT US MILITARY TO GET THEIR ASS KICKED

WHY I, AS A PATRIOT WANT US MILITARY TO GET THEIR ASS KICKED

ok. i always have said to myself "am i realy a terrorist sympathiser? why? i am a good human being, why am i being labeled as some bad guy? and i just realised how to put it in one paragraph:

Because US government chose to fight a war in another country, this war is not for me, but without my asking it costs me my taxpayers share. no matter that more then half voters voted again, because the only second choice kerry was a war criminal. If USA military would get seriously beaten, I as an american patriot would profit because demonstrations back home would stop the war and therefor any military spending coming from my pocket.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2005, 10:11 PM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,425
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 97,385
Default ...

Quote:
Because US government chose to fight a war in another country, this war is not for me, but without my asking it costs me my taxpayers share.
Actually, they did ask you. They asked you last election.

You may have said "no", but more people said "yes". You dont get to opt out just because you were overruled by the majority. Welcome to democracy.

Quote:
Because US government chose to fight a war in another country, this war is not for me, but without my asking it costs me my taxpayers share.
There were other choices besides Kerry. I counted over a dozen parties on my ballot, not counting a write-in box.

Quote:
If USA military would get seriously beaten, I as an american patriot would profit because demonstrations back home would stop the war and therefor any military spending coming from my pocket
Therefore, you want the war effort to fail. No suprise there.
__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 03:37 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default .

agree with everything u said here..

now about election. if you think it is fair (you didnt say it, but i assume you think so) actually ok, it's not about fairness, so no argument ok. it's all about hypocrisy and domination, nothing more.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 03:42 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default i missed this

Quote:
me: Because US government chose to fight a war in another country, this war is not for me, but without my asking it costs me my taxpayers share.

Actually, they did ask you. They asked you last election.
You may have said "no", but more people said "yes".
both Bush AND Kerry were a YES votes. right?
something sure don't add up, because i clearly see more then half the people in reality against the war. not arguing with you here, just pointing out... can't argue this.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:04 AM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,425
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 97,385
Default ...

Quote:
Me: Actually, they did ask you. They asked you last election. You may have said "no", but more people said "yes".

both Bush AND Kerry were a YES votes. right?
More people voted for them than anyone else. You got overruled. Sorry.

Quote:
something sure don't add up, because i clearly see more then half the people in reality against the war.
Apparently not against it enough to vote for someone that opposes it.
__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:21 AM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadistic-Savior";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
something sure don't add up, because i clearly see more then half the people in reality against the war.
Apparently not against it enough to vote for someone that opposes it.
wwwwwait..... i need to ask you a question here and you need to stay in straight line: the media. is it pro war or anti war? (lets say if its with republicans in charge)
i could have sworn i heard all you bush people state numerous times that "media is liberal/democrat". but then explain to me, how come they only presented the 2 pro-war candidates? do you think people would have watched MSNBC or CNN less if these networks would have cut all the "who's ahead in the polls" bullcrap?!?

and to prove my point here: their own polls show that ~60% oppose the war while majority voted for war president.

so they lie about the 60 opposing the war? then why do they spin strictly two pro-war candidates before election?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:37 AM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,425
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 97,385
Default ...

Quote:
wwwwwait..... i need to ask you a question here and you need to stay in straight line: the media. is it pro war or anti war?
Most of it is anti-Bush...which = anti-war.

Quote:
but then explain to me, how come they only presented the 2 pro-war candidates?
uhhh...they didnt have a choice. I know this will come as a shock to you, but the media really isnt who gets to pick who runs. All they can do is try to spin things their way. If it was up to the media, Dean probably would have been elected.

Quote:
do you think people would have watched MSNBC or CNN less if these networks would have cut all the "who's ahead in the polls" bullcrap?!?
They wont lie because they are afraid of getting caught (and thus, losing viewers and marketshare). That doesnt mean they dont have a bias in favor of one side or another.

Quote:
and to prove my point here: their own polls show that ~60% oppose the war while majority voted for war president.
Here, let me repeat myself since you didnt get it the first time:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sadistic-Savior already
Apparently not against it enough to vote for someone that opposes it.
I hope that clears things up.

Quote:
so they lie about the 60 opposing the war?
Either they didnt oppose it at the time or they were not opposed to it enough to motivate them to vote for an alternative.

Quote:
then why do they spin strictly two pro-war candidates before election?
Because those were the leading candidates and that was all they had to work with. That seems obvious to me.

Contrary to your beliefs, no, the media does not have some magic mind control that forces people to vote for whoever they (the media) want. All they can do is spin....they cant manufacture new candidates. Which frustrates them to no end...they most certainly did not want Bush to win.
__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 02:30 PM
Heydrich4president's Avatar
Heydrich4president Heydrich4president is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 272
Heydrich4president is on a distinguished road
Credits: 1,899
Default YEAAHHH

Thanks for your support



As soon as the US Government (however corrupt they are) wasn't there to protect you, Hence the US military. Your throat would be slit ear to ear.

Greetings from Fort benning infantry!
__________________
Yes, I am a mindless, Brainwashed, robot,
AKA an American Infantryman.
Yet somehow I think for myself.....
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 02:38 PM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default with your mouth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heydrich4president";p=&quot View Post
Thanks for your support



As soon as the US Government (however corrupt they are) wasn't there to protect you, Hence the US military. Your throat would be slit ear to ear.

Greetings from Fort benning infantry!
that's what im talking about. it's these type of loser cockroaches that join this military in the first place, the ones who can't get no job cant afford education here, who will miss them if they get killed?? not me.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2005, 02:42 PM
rikitz rikitz is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,648
rikitz is on a distinguished road
Credits: 8,255
Default l

btw, as soon as US government will stop feeding you after getting your asses kicked, you will be on the streets begging for food, and even offering your gf if you have one for a piece of bread. remember my words...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden