I don't believe you are reading what I said, but I will respond once more as if you did. Let's go step by step.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iriemon
So the speculative bubble was because of "artificial" low interest rates
|
Yes, precisely. People were spending money they shouldn't have had in places where that money shouldn't have gone, and this was encouraged (which is really a weaker word that I can think of now) by those interests rates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iriemon
but the market panic which we have despite having much LOWER interest rates is because of "natural correction".
|
The market panic is the
correction to the problem. This is an important thing you must understand. There is so much debt and mal-investment that has been shoved down our throats over the last 30 years that, yes, despite the attempts to lower interest rates further, the economy has finally said, "ENOUGH! This false prosperity cannot continue!" and is not letting the interest rates do their damage. It's like if you drank red bull all night. You would think you are wide awake for all night, and maybe even into a good portion of the next day - but sooner or later,
no matter how much red bull you drink, you will be so overwhelmed by lack of sleep that you will collapse. I hope that analogy clears up your confusion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iriemon
And so, despite your claim that it was these "artificial low" interest rates that caused the speculative bubble, you must concede that they have little effect now and that "natural" forces are really what are driving the market. But these "natural" forces according to you had little effect on the speculative bubble.
|
The natural forces did not have the power they do now because
that bad debt was not there in such an abundance. The reason these forces are so powerful and
demanding a recession is because of the fantasy land we lived in for the whole decade. Think red bull again. It's 11am and you've pulled an all nighter. You get really tired, but open another can (this is like the stock market crash). In about 15 minutes you're on your feet again and doing stuff. But an hour or so later you feel even more tired than before. You try to drink 3 more cans of red bull, but it doesn't seem to be working anymore. You're simply too tired...well in our economy
there is simply too much debt for any artificial interest rates to trick us into thinking we are a rich country. The solution is too go to bed. The solution is the recession. Will it hurt?
Yes, duh. But is it the right thing?
Unfortunately yes. Drinking 20 cans of red bull now, which is what the fed wants to do (they want interest rates lower than 0%!) is failing to see the problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iriemon
And these low "artificially" low interest rates which permeate thru the entire economy somehow only really affected this one part of the economy, and didn't cause hyperinflation.
|
Ever wonder why health care is too expensive? How about education? How about gas prices? Hmmm...hyperinflation? Just wait, my friend.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iriemon
Sorry. Makes no sense, except as simplistic scapegoating effort.
If low interest rates caused the higher prices, they'd be even higher now.
|
In a free market
YES they (the rates) would, and they would've gone up a LOT earlier. But we
don't live in a free market. This is the problem.
It begs the question, too. If low interest rates caused the problem, then why in the world would the fed want to push them lower...hmmm. I can only speculate, but that's another story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iriemon
There is no contradiction in policy because as I have show, your very explanation of the problem that is a faulty contradiction, and I can't be any clearer, friend.
|
Heroin overdose is not the cure for a heroin addict. My argument is as simple as that. I'm open to being wrong, though. Where is the contradiction?