Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 05:30 AM
Smartmouthwoman's Avatar
Smartmouthwoman Smartmouthwoman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 5,078
usa us texas
Smartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 47,341
Default The First Lady's Childhood Obesity Project

Interesting take on the hidden agenda behind Michelle Obama's crusade against childhood obesity. Most schools already feed our kids 2 meals a day... guess they're working toward 3 now. What do you think about this project?

***


Quote:
SEIU fatcats behind First Lady’s anti-obesity campaign
by Michelle Malkin

Behind every seemingly good deed in the Obama White House, there’s a deep-pocketed, left-wing special interest. Take First Lady Michelle Obama’s crusade against childhood obesity. Who really benefits from the ostensible push for improved nutrition in the schools? Think purple – as in the purple-shirted army of the Service Employees International Union. Big Labor bigwigs don’t care about slimming your kids’ waistlines. They care about beefing up their membership rolls and fattening their coffers.

Mrs. Obama earned a State of the Union Address shout-out from her hubby for taking on the weighty public policy issue of students’ physical fitness. The East Wing is now in full campaign mode – leaning on the nation’s mayors, traveling with the Surgeon General, and meeting with Congress and cabinet members to reauthorize the Lyndon Johnson-era Child Nutrition Act, which provides government-subsidized meals to more than 30 million children. It’s part of the Obama administration’s self-proclaimed “cradle-to-career” agenda for America’s youth.

For decades, this Great Society relic has been criticized by school administrators for outgrowing its initial conception. The program was originally created to use up post-World War II food surpluses. In the late 1970s, New York principal Lewis Lyman skewered it as a federal “boondoggle” in a seminal essay for the education journal, Phi Delta Kappan. But Democrats demagogued the GOP’s responsible attempts at financial reform during the Clinton years as “starving the children.” While spending on youth nutrition and wellness have ballooned, so have the kids. Nearly one-third of U.S. children are now overweight or obese. The feds spend $15 billion a year on nutrition in schools; the White House wants at least a $1 billion increase this coming fiscal year.

The well-intended program to feed poor kids has morphed into an untouchable universal entitlement with a powerful school lunch lobbying coalition of Department of Agriculture bureaucrats, food-service industry executives, and union bosses. Enter the SEIU. Headed up by the White House’s most frequent visitor, Andy Stern, the powerful labor organization representing government and private service employees has an insatiable appetite for power and growth. Working alongside the First Lady, the SEIU unveiled a major ad campaign this week demanding reauthorizing and funding increases in the Child Nutrition Act.

What’s in it for Big Labor? SEIU Executive Vice President Mitch Ackerman explains: “A more robust expansion of school lunch, breakfast, summer feeding, child care and WIC [the federal Women, Infants, and Children nutrition program] is critical to reducing hunger, ending childhood obesity, and providing fair wages and healthcare for front line food service workers (emphasis added).” There are 400,000 workers who prepare and serve lunch to American schoolchildren. SEIU represents tens of thousands of those workers and is trying to unionize many more. “More robust expansion” of the federal school lunch law means a mandate for higher wages, increased benefits, and government-guaranteed health insurance coverage (the more luxurious the better now that SEIU has negotiated its Cadillac Tax exemption from the Democrats’ health care takeover bill).

The SEIU’s front group, “Campaign for Quality Services,” is clamoring for “the right to sick days and training” for school food-services workers. Never ones to let a crisis go unexploited, SEIU sent its members to lobby in front of Chicago public schools last year and scare parents into supporting their labor agenda. They accused the school system of “putting our kids at risk” during flu season by resisting the SEIU’s sick day coverage demands. “Without sick days, I can’t take a day off, so I have to bring germs to school,” an SEIU janitor lamented.

Along the same lines, they are casting food-services workers as indispensable saviors. The union has rallied behind p.r. efforts casting them as superheroes “serving justice, and serving lunch.” Opposing the union means opposing children’s health. SEIU propaganda features New Jersey school cafeteria workers like Leslie Williams of Orange, N.J. lamenting: “I love my work, but it’s getting harder to prepare nutritious meals on the low budget we’re working with…It breaks my heart to see a child who’s hungry. As I see it, part of my job is to make sure the kids are well-fed.”

Actually, that’s the primary job of parents. Mom? Dad? Remember them? But the more responsibility we demand of parents, the less power and influence SEIU bosses are able to grab. Unionized school dietician and nutrition jobs are booming. And in addition to school breakfast and lunch, the SEIU is now pushing subsidized dinner plans and summer food service to create a “stronger nutrition safety net.” Translation: Perpetual employment for big government and its public employee union au pairs.

Cede the children, feed the state.
(BTW, here's an interesting comment about the sweet potato Michelle is holding in the pic. Any farmers wanna tell us if this looks like a backyard garden product to you?)

Quote:
On February 3rd, 2010 at 10:24 am, behiker said:
The more I see that photo of MO with the sweet potato, the more I think it was faked. I’ve never seen a sweet potato grow that large in a backyard garden. My family used to raise sweet potatoes in fertilized fields with good topsoil that received direct sunlight from sunrise to sunset. Even with all that, the size of our average potatoes were smaller than the one she is holding. I’d be willing to bet big money that the potato was raised elsewhere and put in the ground for this lovely photo op.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 05:53 AM
CarlB CarlB is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 464
CarlB is just really niceCarlB is just really niceCarlB is just really niceCarlB is just really nice
Credits: 2,116
Default

Some points:

1. This is a horrifically biased article by the most obvious hack ever.

2. There is a real, vast problem with kids being neglected in this country.

3. Every program uses money, that doesn't mean it isn't a real program. Did we create out military originally to give billions to Halliburton?

4. How the (*)(*)(*)(*) is wanting sick days, which should be mandated for every employer in America, some sort of vast, corrupt, union plot to take all our money?

How can anyone take this crap seriously?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:00 AM
The Dude's Avatar
The Dude The Dude is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 996
usa
The Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 3,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman View Post
Interesting take on the hidden agenda behind Michelle Obama's crusade against childhood obesity. Most schools already feed our kids 2 meals a day... guess they're working toward 3 now. What do you think about this project?

***




(BTW, here's an interesting comment about the sweet potato Michelle is holding in the pic. Any farmers wanna tell us if this looks like a backyard garden product to you?)
So is this article suggesting that we don't try to help fight obesity in children? This is a huge problem.
__________________
"Let me say, at the risk of seeming ridiculous, that the true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." - Ernesto 'Che' Guevara.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:06 AM
homerjay_s's Avatar
homerjay_s homerjay_s is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,026
usa us rhode island
homerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond reputehomerjay_s has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
So is this article suggesting that we don't try to help fight obesity in children? This is a huge problem.
No, it's suggesting that anything the Obama administration does that has a good cause behind it is just a front to help unions and political cronies.

What more would one expect from Michelle Malkin?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:09 AM
TheHighForester's Avatar
TheHighForester TheHighForester is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hohenwald
Posts: 2,159
usa us tennessee
TheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond reputeTheHighForester has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 13,020
Default

I cannot think of a single positive contribution Michelle Malkin has made to our country or to our society--therefore she is able to make an exccellent living as a "troll dietician" for those who can't seem to let an hour pass without finding some reason to criticize the President and/or the First Lady.

Chilhood obesity, which some dismiss as irrelevant and others deride as a means for the SEIU to expand its griop on our resources, is actually a grave probklem, and Mrs. Obama should be applauded for making it central to her activities, much as thoughtful Americans applauded Laura Bush for her efforts to promote literacy. Childhood obesity, which in some states is present in up to 80% of our children, leads to many SERIOUS medical prtoblems--both in childhood and later in life. Diabetes, and heart disease (for example) are nothing to laugh about, even if Ms. Malkin finds them amusing. Besides the obvious medical consequences, it is fair to point out that those afflicted become less productive citizens, live shorter lives, and incur higher medical costs (which are subsidized, through insurance premiums and government programs, by their fellow citizens).

It is unfortunate that even the most well-intentioned efforts are derided--if they attract the "wrong" people. But most Americans are perceptive enough to recognize that Mrs. Obama is right on target here, and will support her initiative. Ms. Malkin should find another vehicle on which to vent her spleen.
__________________
Signature deleted

Recidivist violator of Rule 13
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:09 AM
daisydotell's Avatar
daisydotell daisydotell is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,119
daisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 27,803
Default

Did the SEIU give her the purple sweater to wear?
No, that is not an ordinary sweet potato looks more like a sweet potato that was grown in Mississippi. A picture of her holding a stalk of celery would be more appropriate and would make more sense.
__________________
If you think you are a person of some influence try ordering some else's dog around.

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:10 AM
CarlB CarlB is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 464
CarlB is just really niceCarlB is just really niceCarlB is just really niceCarlB is just really nice
Credits: 2,116
Default

Oh, Michelle Malkin, no wonder.

Hey, where's her article about how Bush passed that funding bill for schools where they had to buy testing software from his brother's company???
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:17 AM
Smartmouthwoman's Avatar
Smartmouthwoman Smartmouthwoman is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 5,078
usa us texas
Smartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond reputeSmartmouthwoman has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 47,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHighForester View Post
I cannot think of a single positive contribution Michelle Malkin has made to our country or to our society--therefore she is able to make an exccellent living as a "troll dietician" for those who can't seem to let an hour pass without finding some reason to criticize the President and/or the First Lady.

Chilhood obesity, which some dismiss as irrelevant and others deride as a means for the SEIU to expand its griop on our resources, is actually a grave probklem, and Mrs. Obama should be applauded for making it central to her activities, much as thoughtful Americans applauded Laura Bush for her efforts to promote literacy. Childhood obesity, which in some states is present in up to 80% of our children, leads to many SERIOUS medical prtoblems--both in childhood and later in life. Diabetes, and heart disease (for example) are nothing to laugh about, even if Ms. Malkin finds them amusing. Besides the obvious medical consequences, it is fair to point out that those afflicted become less productive citizens, live shorter lives, and incur higher medical costs (which are subsidized, through insurance premiums and government programs, by their fellow citizens).

It is unfortunate that even the most well-intentioned efforts are derided--if they attract the "wrong" people. But most Americans are perceptive enough to recognize that Mrs. Obama is right on target here, and will support her initiative. Ms. Malkin should find another vehicle on which to vent her spleen.
So what are you proposing Michelle do to 'fix' fat kids, HF... govt takeover of the feeding of our children? Maybe Uncle Sam could issue kid-sized C-rations like soldiers get and make it against the law to drive thru Mickey D's?

She shoulda stuck with literacy or promoting higher education or sexual abstinence (since teen pregnancies are on the rise). Fighting childhood obesity been done for the last decade... removing soft drink & snack machines from public schools, reducing fat & salt in school lunches, etc. She just took up the torch for something easy... and something that would benefit her friends at SEIU.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:18 AM
daisydotell's Avatar
daisydotell daisydotell is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,119
daisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond reputedaisydotell has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 27,803
Default

Obesity in children can be laid at the parents' doorstep. Some people have raised their children on convenience meals and fast food restaurant meals. A little time and planning to put a balanced diet on the table is all that is needed and obesity would not be such a problem. So instead of targeting obese children maybe the government should target people eating at fast food restaurants and serving convenience foods. Lets really get the government involved in our everyday life.
__________________
If you think you are a person of some influence try ordering some else's dog around.

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 06:20 AM
The Dude's Avatar
The Dude The Dude is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 996
usa
The Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond reputeThe Dude has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 3,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daisydotell View Post
Obesity in children can be laid at the parents' doorstep. Some people have raised their children on convenience meals and fast food restaurant meals. A little time and planning to put a balanced diet on the table is all that is needed and obesity would not be such a problem. So instead of targeting obese children maybe the government should target people eating at fast food restaurants and serving convenience foods. Lets really get the government involved in our everyday life.
I don't think anyone is targeting the children, but you are right it is not their fault. They should also go after a lot of these corporations who are in the food industry, but I have a feeling that won't happen.
__________________
"Let me say, at the risk of seeming ridiculous, that the true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." - Ernesto 'Che' Guevara.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pollution causes Obesity? Bowerbird Science & Technology 16 02-24-2010 06:39 AM
New York wants and obesity tax Neoduck Current Events 73 12-29-2008 07:39 AM
A Lady's Occupation namvet Humor & Satire 5 05-13-2008 11:39 AM
Hillary's handlers need to shut the old lady's mouth! Jake Political Opinions & Beliefs 16 01-31-2007 10:19 PM
First Lady's PatrioticGal Elections & Campaigns 1 08-05-2004 07:58 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden