Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p="
The neoconservative agenda, which has come to dominate the foreign policy of the right, attempts to justify changing regimes by force to spread democracy.
|
I think the whole neoconservative conspiracy is just some talk by paranoid liberal partisans. They can’t seem to accept defeat.
Quote:
|
The basis of democracy is universal suffrage, which gives the power of government to the people. In the course of liberating un-democratic nations, however, we inevitably kill many civilians no matter how we try to avoid doing so.
|
Many of these civilians also kill other civilians e.g. Hutus vs. Tutsis.
Quote:
|
We are, therefore, risking their lives to bring them voting rights.
|
The alternative seems to be having them butchered by another dictator.
Lives are also risked by providing electricity (electrocution), natural gas (potentially explosive), food (food poisoning), mind altering substances (accidents caused by intoxication), or a license to drive (car accidents).
Quote:
|
If, for some bizarre reason, all people in your country were deprived of the right to vote, would you be willing to risk your life to regain the right to vote? I for one would not risk my life for voting rights alone.
|
I would risk my life if I had a good chance of surviving. I don’t want to be cannon fodder.
Quote:
|
I am not directly referring to the war in Iraq, by the way, but rather on the neoconservative agenda in general.
|
It sounds more like the liberal agenda e.g. judicial activism.