Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 01:27 PM
ForceoftheTruth's Avatar
ForceoftheTruth ForceoftheTruth is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,897
ForceoftheTruth is on a distinguished road
Credits: 42,793
Default Dehumanization

This is why I hate myself for being a heterosexual male. If I act in any way differently around a beautiful woman than I would around a man or a woman who seems less attractive, I am dehumanizing her (as well as the supposedly less attractive woman). Now, some moderate feminists would state that male sexuality becomes a problem only if it sees women as valuable primarily for their appearance. Radical feminists disagree, and I see the case of radical feminists as stronger. Consider this. If I see a beautiful woman and 5% of my thoughts are related to her appearance, I am treating her as less than fully human. In other words, the same woman with the same intellect and character would receive 5% less notice from me. I am, therefore, treating both women as having only 95% of the worth of a man. That is why I have decided that all male carnal tendencies are sexist and that I must attempt to make my eyes gender-blind and never go on a date. Now, some men might counter by saying, "Women do the same thing". That is true, but far fewer of them do so far less often. Please don't attack me for posting this. I am truly sorry if it offends anyone, but I felt I had to discuss issues that are painful to me. Thank you very much.
__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 01:42 PM
Bgdawg Bgdawg is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 31
Bgdawg is an unknown quantity at this point
Credits: 247
Default z

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
This is why I hate myself for being a heterosexual male. If I act in any way differently around a beautiful woman than I would around a man or a woman who seems less attractive, I am dehumanizing her (as well as the supposedly less attractive woman). Now, some moderate feminists would state that male sexuality becomes a problem only if it sees women as valuable primarily for their appearance. Radical feminists disagree, and I see the case of radical feminists as stronger. Consider this. If I see a beautiful woman and 5% of my thoughts are related to her appearance, I am treating her as less than fully human. In other words, the same woman with the same intellect and character would receive 5% less notice from me. I am, therefore, treating both women as having only 95% of the worth of a man. That is why I have decided that all male carnal tendencies are sexist and that I must attempt to make my eyes gender-blind and never go on a date. Now, some men might counter by saying, "Women do the same thing". That is true, but far fewer of them do so far less often. Please don't attack me for posting this. I am truly sorry if it offends anyone, but I felt I had to discuss issues that are painful to me. Thank you very much.
Are you aware that different men see different women as beautiful? You could stand the same woman in front of 10 men and each one will see differing degrees of beauty. so to say that you must become gender blind is pure lunacy.

Are you capable of standing next to a woman and not be sexually attracted to her? Of course you are. So if you interact with a woman and have no attraction to her how does she rate compared to a woman you are attracted to? How about a sister and a brother. Does the Brother automatically devalue his sister by not being attracted to her? Or his grandmother? It's ridiculous to think that you are some how degrading a person because you see them as attractive. It's how we are made, we gravitate toward people we find attractive for what ever reason. Being Humiliated is a choice, as is being offended and degraded. If you treat people fairly, honestly and be yourself, you have nothing to fear. If I treat you fairly and you choose to be offended by me there is little I can do to stop that from occuring.

You need to re-evaluate what you were taught in comparison to reality.
__________________
Get on the Soap box at http://politicsforum.forumup.org/
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 01:48 PM
ForceoftheTruth's Avatar
ForceoftheTruth ForceoftheTruth is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,897
ForceoftheTruth is on a distinguished road
Credits: 42,793
Default .

Well, Bgdawg, you are a Fundamenalist, and Fundamentalists see women as deserving subordinate roles in society, so I can't take any advice from you on this subject. You may as well not waste your time posting in this thread and do something else that interests you. I don't mean that in an offensive way. I need a secular, sociological perspective on this subject.
__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 01:58 PM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,425
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 97,385
Default ...

Quote:
This is why I hate myself for being a heterosexual male. If I act in any way differently around a beautiful woman than I would around a man or a woman who seems less attractive, I am dehumanizing her (as well as the supposedly less attractive woman).
Why does treating her deifferently = dehumanizing.

Quote:
Now, some moderate feminists would state that male sexuality becomes a problem only if it sees women as valuable primarily for their appearance.
They make the incorrect assumption that because a woman is valued for her appearance, that this must mean she cant be valued for other things. Or that ugly women arnt valued at all. That assumption is wrong.

Why is it fair to value a woman on intelligence or athletic ability, but not on beauty? After all, all these criteria are genetic.

Quote:
If I see a beautiful woman and 5% of my thoughts are related to her appearance, I am treating her as less than fully human.
Why?

Quote:
In other words, the same woman with the same intellect and character would receive 5% less notice from me.
You could say the same about a female athlete. Or a female genius. Does the female genius have more value than the female that is not a genius?

Quote:
I am, therefore, treating both women as having only 95% of the worth of a man.
If you respect a man for being smart, doesnt that also devalue stupid men as being worth less?

Quote:
Please don't attack me for posting this. I am truly sorry if it offends anyone
Jesus Christ, will you STOP apologizing ?Thats the only thing I want to attack you on. It is so (*)(*)(*)(*) annoying. Grow some balls already.
__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 02:01 PM
ForceoftheTruth's Avatar
ForceoftheTruth ForceoftheTruth is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,897
ForceoftheTruth is on a distinguished road
Credits: 42,793
Default .

I should value women solely for their character. Even intelligence shouldn't matter. To ignore a woman's appearance entirely, however, I must somehow disavow my gender and gender in general. I am trying, but it is extremely painful and sometimes makes me suicidal.
__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 02:10 PM
Sadistic-Savior's Avatar
Sadistic-Savior Sadistic-Savior is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 16,425
usa us colorado
Sadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond reputeSadistic-Savior has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 97,385
Default ...

Quote:
I should value women solely for their character.
Is that really fair? After all, some women may have a genetic pre-disposition to what you consider to be bad character.

Quote:
Even intelligence shouldn't matter. To ignore a woman's appearance entirely, however, I must somehow disavow my gender and gender in general.
So instead of physical attractiveness, you value other genetic attributes. Oh yeah, thats way more fair, heh heh

Quote:
I am trying, but it is extremely painful and sometimes makes me suicidal.
You cant achieve goals if you cant define them. Explain to me what "character" is, how you objectively define "good" character, and how it is something all women can reasonably achieve regardless of their genetic predispositions.

If you judge them on character you are still judging them.
__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 02:13 PM
Shamgar Shamgar is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 904
Shamgar is on a distinguished road
Credits: 9,050
Default `

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
This is why I hate myself for being a heterosexual male.
Don't worry only an effeminate would make a statement like that. . you are "kosher". . .

1 Cor 6: 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Thank God there is one less antichrist with the death of. . . Betty Friedan née Betty Naomi Goldstein born February 4, 1921, Peoria, Illinois, U.S. American feminist best known for her book The Feminine Mystique (1963), which explored the causes of the frustrations of modern women in traditional roles.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 02:23 PM
ForceoftheTruth's Avatar
ForceoftheTruth ForceoftheTruth is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,897
ForceoftheTruth is on a distinguished road
Credits: 42,793
Default .

I'll go a step further, S-S. I should deal with all people in precisely the same way- even apart from character. I should think of them all in precisely the same way as well. Otherwise, I am dehumanizing them. Trying to achieve that goal, which requires me to ignore gender, though, brings me panic attacks, tactile hallucinations of being raped and severe depression and debilitates me every day of my life. I am truly at a loss as to what I should do. Of course, you're not my counselor, but the political and the personal are interconnected. What I do in my life will affect my politics.
__________________
"I am a Tory Anarchist. I should like every one to go about doing just as he pleased- short of altering any of the things to which I have grown accustomed." (Max Beerbohm)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 02:31 PM
Liberty's Avatar
Liberty Liberty is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,705
usa us georgia
Liberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud of
Credits: 23,740
Default .

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceoftheTruth";p=&quot View Post
To ignore a woman's appearance entirely, however, I must somehow disavow my gender and gender in general.
How dehumanizing.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2006, 02:31 PM
AngryAmerican AngryAmerican is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 12
AngryAmerican is on a distinguished road
Credits: 216
Default As a woman...

I really think you are being too hard on yourself. It's great that you can recognize and take responsibility for your feelings toward women though. However, don't you see that shows that you DO respect women, especially compared to a lot of other men?
__________________
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."
-- Alexander Hamilton
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden