![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Sorry to break the news to you like this but we already lost the war the day they trashed the Constitution and Bill of Rights to keep us safe from these boogy men.
But even if we had not already lost do you seriously think we have the resources to fight half the worlds population in a never ending action against a endless list of Arab countries who Israel doesn't particularly like? If you feel so strongly about it go join the military and fight them. Did it ever occur to you that if we just moved all our military back home and minded our own business we wouldn't have to worry about all that? Do you or do you not feel that the U.S. has the right to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries no matter how bad they are if we have no proof they have done anything to us? . |
|
||||
|
1st - If i was old enough to join he army i would but im not so i cant but i do want to enlist in the armed forces when i am of age.
2nd- We are not fighting other countries we are keeping our own country safe, by fighting muslim extremist that live in other countries. We are not fighting half the worlds population because the majority of the muslim people are not extremists and many of them may even denounce the actions off these "extremists." 3rd- we do have proof that these terrorist did do something to us, do you not recall what happend to us on september 11th. Or are you one of those people that belive all that www.loosechange.com stuff. We are not interfering with other countries business, just those who live within their borders. 4th- we havn't lost the war, but we can and we will if people like you don't realize what will happen to us if we lose. -last- even if we shouldnt have gone over there, we did, and now we cant just leave those innocent people and let them be consumed by those extremists. They are attacking not only the military, but the people who live thier as well,(other muslims). That would make thing alot worse. I for one think that when you start something that you should finish it , i guess my moral standards are a little to high.
__________________
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." -V |
|
|||
|
rota, et.al Can you not see the uselessness of your postion? The entire reason we have now to deal with these murderous terroist is because we ignored them all through out the 90s. I once, a long time ago, was an isolationist but have seen the error of that view. You need to understand that these muslum terroist have a goal. They have a plan. Their goal, their plan is to KILL YOU and everyone else that does not believe the way they do. They are going to continue toward that goal regardless of what we do or don't do. It is a certainty that if we do nothing, as you suggest, they will simply achieve their goal sooner. We have NO choice but to destroy them before they destroy us. This fight WILL happen the only questions being where will it take place, and who will win.
I say, and most Americans agree, that it should take place in Iraq and Afganistan, rather then in the US, and that WE MUST WIN! |
|
|||
|
aaaah the terrorists are gonna get us!!!! run for the hills!!! they're everywhere and threat our lives!!!!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Let us see just one example of a "right" that you have lost due to something President Bush has done!
Yey, the terrorist had nothing against us before 9/11 they just committed the first World Trade Center bombing, the Cole, and the dozen other attacks on the US or it's interest before 9/11 just for the fun of it. You do not win a war by setting around watching your enemy get stronger. President Bush started no war, he responded to the war that was started on us and to the threats, which we must take serious, the terrorist have made many times that they will destroy the US and all nations which do not bend to their point of view and surrender to them. There is, and always has been, only ONE way to win a war, by complete, total, victory. Nothing short will do. We will win despite the aiders and abettors within our own country and their help to our enemies. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
. |
|
||||
|
It is true that the government can listen to me talking on the phone, but what do i have to hide? If the government can stop just one terrorist attack by this "evesdropping" then some lives have been saved, maybe even your own.
where is the post that tells of all the rights we are denied here in america. I am interested and would like to read it. the actual article that i summerized above can be found at this link http://www.snopes.com/rumors/soapbox/chong.asp disregard the speculation about who wrote it , what matters that it was written and it makes a lot of sense
__________________
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." -V |
|
||||
|
Quote:
hat if the government begins to shove too many resources into eavesdropping and actually gets to the point where they are eavesdropping on all Americans? I know you don't care about what this means for privacy, but think about it in economic terms. Ever heard of opportunity cost? Part of research and data collecting for security purposes is deciding which information sources are the most useful for getting good information and focusing on those sources. Wasting any amount of time on your calls to relatives across the sea is not only a waste of their time and your tax dollars- it's a waste of time and tax dollars that could have been used on a better intelligence source. At the same time, intelligence gathering is similar to the world of finance in that one must diversify. The more we focus on phone calls, the less we can focus on intelligence gathered in the field or from documents or from anything else. So if the government is to be allowed to eavesdrop, it's important to set guidelines as to what they should be using time on. It better be something (*)(*)(*)(*) suspicious. Alternatively they can spend even more money on a larger intelligence bureaucracy so that they have enough analysts to cover all the info and we can always hope that somehow it all gets reconciled at the higher level with minimal confusion. I guess then at least I could find a full-time job. When did we decide that this wiretapping was necessary? There is no real evidence to show that wiretapping would have prevented 9/11. How many terrorist attacks on us were successful before 9/11? Not many. Care to guess how many were thwarted by our intelligence agencies? One failure and suddenly they're completely incompetent and we need to alter everything. I can go with the changes that actually connect to why 9/11 wasn't thwarted: more ability to share information between agencies. Good idea. But another problem was all the noise that kept intelligence agencies from focusing on the right information. Adding more to the noise is not going to help. It's going to make the situation worse.
__________________
That information is classified and to be given only on a need-to-know basis... And I do not need to know. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|