I view anything which castigates a person (ie a Jew) as being a Nazi, based solely on his being a member of that race as being objectively racist. That's what your OP did. It's a piece of (*)(*)(*)(*).
Originally Posted by Awryly
I can't believe from our long association on this board that you are being so pig headed because when challenged, instead of clarifying that you had expressed yourself in a woefully inappropriate way, you continue with this evil drivel.
And, make no mistake, evil is the best word to characterize your apparent conversion to Holocaust denial. If you think that what Israelis are doing today is remotely comparable to the Holocaust in essence or degree, then you have indeed crossed that line into Holocaust denial. If on the other hand you are looking for casual similarities between States at war in order to throw hurtful insults then you may be guilty of the lesser charge of reckless intellectual hooliganism.
As you choose to persist without clarification, expressing yourself in the same hamfisted way, then I can only conclude that you are with David Irving in your assessment of what actually happened in the middle of the twentieth century in Germany, Poland and other places.
Your accusation "if...you would..." about me and the way I argue is pathetic. It's lazy and without any foundation. If I compare anyone with Nazis I do so very carefully. To do otherwise is to defecate on the graves of those who were real victims of the Nazis. As you have done.
You don't meet any of the points I make but you just windily dismiss them. I had at least though that you had some interest in debate but it seems that you are only interested in uttering anti-semitic abuse against "joos". Your posts make the reader feel dirty. They are nasty, prejudiced, bigoted little rolls of faeces. They speak to barbarism and darkness. They cross a line.
You have joined a long tradition of grotesque perversion with this filth: Mosely's blackshirts marching through the East End, Petain's collaborators in France, and of course Hitlers stormtroopers. They have their successors today, all belittling the Holocaust by saying "it was just like all countries who had wars with their neighbours and committed a few excesses". You join that thuggish cabal with your posted lies. You join and are complcit in the race attacks and the barbarity perpetrated by today's Nazis who minimize and talk down the Holocaust as you do. These posts of yours are not only lies, but they are music to the ears of the successors of Hitler, Goebbels and Heydrich. They are an act of collaboration with the BNP, the Front National and all the other brave new Nazis who tell us "Hitler wasn't so bad, OK he went a bit too far sometimes, but that's life...he's the same as modern day Israel, we've learned our lesson".
My point is very clear - when you make a blanket comparison of a RACE with NAZIs then you should at the very least explain why this comparson is more than just "not giving then a free pass". When do I give the IDF a free pass? I have a record of attacking the Israeli state for its excesses. I suppose you find it easy to imagine a simplistic world of extremist Israeli nationalists, Mein Kampf tucked under their arms, ranked against the angels on your side.
Your "either you agree that Jews are Nazis or you are giving them a free pass" is utterly disgusting. As is your whole position on this one. I have regularly fought right wing turds who argue that the Left is a source of anti-semitism. I am losing that argument everytime I read a piece of filth like the posts on the subject that you post.
Last edited by Heroclitus; Nov 07 2011 at 11:12 PM.
Plus on aime quelqu'un, moins il faut qu'on le flatte:
À rien pardonner le pur amour éclate. Moliere
I think the term "classical liberal" is also equally applicable. I don't really care very much what I'm called. I'm much more interested in having people thinking about the ideas, rather than the person. Milton Friedman
Die Sonne scheint noch. Es lebe die Freiheit!