A couple of weeks ago, I posted a question to Democrats I knew would draw no answers, because the question had no answer. I asked "if Democrats in Congress were officially signed-on as lobbyists for the terrorists in Iraq, how would they behave any differently than they now behave in working for America's defeat?"

The question sat for about a week, drawing the usual "cat-calls," "hisses," "boos," and air-swipes with freshly painted claws, but the answer of course was....... no answer. Finally, one brave soul showed the depths hate-driven desperation in Dems, and offered this masterpiece of logic: I paraphrase, "If Democrats wanted terrorists to win, they would invade Iraq and kill them." If this sounds logical to you, see a doctor .

If that question bothered you, this one will really make you row in a circle with one oar out of the water. I posted it on another thread that you likely missed, so here it is again. The question proves the inevitable fatal flaw in Liberalism, and therefore, goes not to Liberals.........they have a natural lobotomy in the area of the brain necessary to contemplate this problem.............but to young lurkers who haven't yet had their brains turned to mush by the Liberal Indoctrination Machines posing as the "news" media and the "education" system.

Failure to have an answer for this, but continued support of Liberal agendas, proves beyond any rational doubt that Liberalism is not a political philosophy..........it's a mental disorder. (Thank you, Michael Savage, for noticing.) Warning: Responses by Liberals that include only "jeers" and name-calling but no attempt to answer, only proves my point about the "natural lobotomy" . Here we go:

<<Liberals always propose to solve problems they perceive in society by involving government, including the raising of taxes confiscated in order to fund the additional governmental growth they think necessary for a solution. As government has grown larger and larger over time, with higher and higher percentage rates of taxation to feed it, what do Liberals plan to do to solve society's problems after the inevitable 100% tax rate is reached?>>

They would make every effort to elect a 'Cesar Chavez of Venezuela', because he is their answer to all liberal problems, government intervention and dictatorship = no freedoms.

__________________
Cheney is the second executive officer to shoot someone in the face and chest. Clinton was the first.

Well...............(tic,toc, tic, toc, tic). It's been all day long and no answers, eh' Dems? We knew that.

Sundays are always slow, though I suspect the real reason no one is answering is no one cares.

No one is obligated to answer your question just because you asked it.

__________________
WARNING: In the unlikely event of an accidental agreement with any or all points made in the above post, contact a clinical psychologist immediately.

The views expressed in the above post are not necessarily those of Joker and/or any of his affiliates.

That's exactly my point, Joker.......Liberals don't care what happens to America tomorrow, as long as they get to punish productive citizens today. And that's the first time you've been right since I joined this forum .

@ truthiness... her obsession and hate for the liberal boogieman is becoming amusing.

__________________
.




"When I'm in command, every mission is a suicide mission!" -Capt. Zapp Branigan
The United Church of the Latter Day Tangential Tarts

Deficits are a form of taxation on future generations, and all taxation is ultimately a punishment of productivity. Which party's President is spending $2.9 trillion per year (not counting the non-existent Social Security surplus and "emergency" funding for Iraq)? Which party's Vice-President said outright, "Deficits don't matter"? I'll give you a hint: It isn't the Democratic Party. The GOP's agenda is one of spreading political equality through warfare (adapted Trotskyism), using domestic spending- including deficit spending- as a political tool and generally adopting policies that strongly resemble those of the authoritarian "Old Democrats" (FDR, Truman and LBJ). I would add that deficit spending is particularly insidious because it guarantees future government control, and it is the Republican Party that is pushing harder for deficit spending as a deliberate policy.

Of course, the Republican Party isn't conservative at all and hasn't been since 1998, but it isn't liberal in the traditional sense (liberal though it is in spending money). I've no love for the Democratic Party, but the party that has been pushing deficits to record levels is the Republican Party, which has turned from small, limited government to a big government warfare/welfare state. I happen to think that the percentage of a nation's GDP that a government controls through taxation and spending is a good measure of its liberty (a higher percentage indicates less liberty), but the Republicans I'm guessing you vote for sure as heck don't believe that- or maybe they don't care.

__________________
"Some people complain about the system. The system is not good, so they can't do anything. It's an excuse. Freedom is in your heart." (Jin Xing)

I am sure it was some sort of oversight; you failed to provide a link to your last failed attempt to provide a coherent argument for your twisted line of inquiry:

http://www.politicalforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=26512

Who Knows? Someone might want to know what was actually written.

truth offender groveling for a reply:such an igorant neocon ... [pardon the redundancy] ... supports fiscal self-gratification - extraordinary and disproportionate tax relief for the affluent during time of war - and then asks liberals how they will clean up the republican spawned smegma.

try being clever for a change and explain what this regime should do to right our fiscal problems before we need to impose a 100% tax rate. you can't but then neither can dubya

__________________
“Mayor Palin fails to have a firm grasp of something very simple: the truth.”

[Frontiersman editorial, 2/7/97]

That completely misrepresents reality.

The answer is to spend less.

Now let's get to THE FACTS

While democrats are spendthrifts and I think spending should be lowered, however the republicans are worse. The FACT is that Bush has increased spending faster than any democrat since WWII. The fact is that the republicans passed the largest entitlement increase in 40 years, and without any provision to fund it. So maybe you think that republicans have some miracle plan to raise spending and cut taxes, but the real question is:

The question that republicans can't answer

Since the republicans are spending wildly and running up massive deficits, the national debt has exploded as a result. Annual interest payments are now in the hundreds of billions - $405,872,109,315.83 to be exact for FY 2006. SO the question is, when the interest expense exceeds all tax revenue, what are you going to do?