![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
I am afraid I must apologize...after all, I have been making petty jokes on this thread, when the original intent was obviously to start a technology piѕsing contest. I didnt mean to be rude.
Quote:
Quote:
Apparently, communism can advance just fine as long as it has democracies to leech technology from. Too bad for them they could not also leech off of our economy. They might still be around. Quote:
As for TV...the actual technology was invented by a German, not a Russian: Quote:
Quote:
Magnetic Storage: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On to the electric lamp...based on technology (light bulbs) developed first by Edison: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Plus an extreme lack of education....or at worst knowing full well how absurd it is but not caring. Same calibre of person uses the Nazis camp system as well. |
|
||||
|
A lot of inventions of USSR you did not know,because USSR was closed country and First winged rocket which was controled by men was build in USSR in Afghan War.....a lot of medical invantions and others........just because f'cken communism was closed to outside world......SO VODKA IS Drinks which was entered to Russia with tsar Peter the Great....samagon is russian same drinks.....Vodka is not ukraine or russian thing......Vodka kill,Vodka is evel thing!!!!Medovuha is best thing,Honey spirt drinks FOREVER!!!!
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
You are right, this is absurd - in the US the Gulag prision system is largely privatised; not that state run, inefficient communist manner of caging their populations.
__________________
"A man's work is nothing but this slow trek to rediscover, through the detours of art, those two or three great and simple images in whose presence his heart first opened." |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
The first working model was made at Hull university England. The development of the DSM mode of LCDs was made in the US But after all when the US nick something their ability to see where it came from disappears. Copy right theft is a US national pass time. Quote:
What the US know about invention could be written on the back of a postage stamp. What the US know about theft could be written many books founding many libraries. As for the reader in you disc drive it's a good job the russians invented the laser. |
|
|||
|
There appear to be several themes running through this thread. The most prominent seems to be simplistic and juvenile cheer leading for the technical and scientific prowess of one nationality versus another. A secondary thread involves (implicitly) the conditions that promote such advancements. That's considerably more interesting. Some observations.
Genius is distributed randomly. Making genius pay off in the form of scientific breakthroughs and even more crucially in terms of technological advancements requires a social and economic infrastructure that is most common in wealthy nations or in nations where a command economy can concentrate available resources productively. Large (especially large developed) nations have significant advantages simply because they have more geniuses and more resources to devote to research and development. A weakness of command economies is that they depend to a large extent on "betting" correctly about the most productive directions of technology development. A strength of command economies is that if decision makers bet correctly, the concentration of resources necessary to achieve scientific and technological breakthroughs is easier to accomplish. Even nations that are otherwise committed to "free" markets frequently engage in politically driven investment (similar to command economies) in particular areas of science and technology. The Manhattan Project, for example, was not based on allowing the "market" to determine the direction of technological development. It followed the same model as the Soviets' in the recruitment and compulsion of scientists driven toward a politically determined goal. By the same token, if a nation can afford to do so, the "waste" of a free market in funding R&D can, from time to time, pay off in unexpected ways. It bears noting, however, that such success is matched by other failures that are seldom noted. (From an economic standpoint there is no difference between wasting resources in the public and private sectors. But in a society where private investment is viewed as laudable, the social cost of such waste is ignored in the private sector and publicized in the public sector.) All in all, if a nation wishes to be technologically productive, it's good to be rich, large, and already technologically advanced compared to one's competitors. Those conditions make additional technological development and scientific breakthroughs more likely. And if one is big and rich enough, a "free" market and limited government direction of investment can pay off in innovation. In the absence of those conditions, the best bet appears to be to adopt a command economy with the attendant ability to direct investment through government action. In that case, success largely depends on decision makers "betting" the investment successfully.
__________________
"To announce that..we are to stand by the president whether right or wrong..is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt, 1918 |
|
||||
|
The World Wide Web (or the "Web") is a system of interlinked, hypertext documents that runs over the Internet. With a Web browser, a user views Web pages that may contain text, images, and other multimedia and navigates between them using hyperlinks. The Web was created around 1990 by the Englishman Tim Berners-Lee and the Belgian Robert Cailliau working at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. Since then, Berners-Lee has played an active role in guiding the development of Web standards (such as the markup languages in which Web pages are composed), and in recent years has advocated his vision of a Semantic Web.
In the 90's??? you want to stick with that? OK I worked on the Internet in MIT in the 60's and 70's but I was not the ones who came up with it for the government. the Internet is older then you think and was a project for the government in the 60's that the government asked a few people at MIT to help with. then later on the government handed it over to the public. your so full of it. .
__________________
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. Thomas Jefferson |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|