Thread: Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

Okay this is the last time I am going to give you the attention you seek so enjoy it.yes it IS a fact,the onlyone lying is YOU and you know it.

I'm lying about nothing. I back up my claims with credible sources. You don't.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

No sense in bringin his name up,yu'll ignore it.I listed two names of doctors earlier like i was asked to and you still sprout off incoherant ramblings and take the word of zapruder instead of them,how retarded is THAT?

Fabrication. You named no doctors. You're resorting to lying about my position and mischaracterizing me to make your argument stronger. Others may allow you to get away with doing that but you're not getting away with it here.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

f your posts were so pathetic i WOULD have given you his name but you dont want to learn,you just want to troll.

I see. I'll take that as an admission that you're incapable of backing up your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

I dont know,I did not forge it,ask the forgerers.lol.

I see. I'll take that as an admission that you're incapable of logically defending your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

Nope its plenty obvious.

Your say-so is not good enough.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

No you cant.Horseman took you to school on that and shot down those patheitc ramblings of yours.lol

He did no such thing. Prove that his brains couldn't have gone behind him in an accellerating car after being shot from behind.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

the copies were OWNED by time magazine a front for the CIA.

Prove that Time Magazine is a front for the CIA.
Prove that the Zapruder film and all copies were altered.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

again you prove you have done no reasearch other than what the government has told you.

The government has told me nothing. I'm debunking your dubious claims using sheer logic.
The only thing you believe is what the internet videos and space aliens tell you. I think your tin foil hat is on a little bit too tight.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

It has been proven that the film was faked and so is the blood many times,you ignored it as we both know.

If it was proven, you wouldn't have any trouble providing me with a credible source backing up your claims. As it stands, you have not, but have continued to beat around the bush. My guess is your claims are just unverifiable bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

no you cant.Your pathetic ramblings of how his brains could have gone anywhere after he was shot AGAIN where shot down by horseman.again you prove you ditched junior high school science classes.

He did no such thing. Prove that his brains couldn't have gone behind him in an accellerating car after being shot from behind.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

you are descibing yourself,your not describing me.the only one who is making wild exagerrated claims and then when pressed to provide proof of a credible source and then backs off and goes off on some wild exaggerated stroy thats based on pure speculation with zero proof is you! so you are describing you when talking about someone who is extremely delusional,paranoid or simply a troll. I already know which one it is.I have proved that many times.

sure I do but you will ignore it like you do with everthing else otherwise i would post it here.Ipost things for people WILLING TO learn,you clearly arent.

Random fluff; empty rhetoric.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

oh please that is the most pathetic line of them all,everybody who has seen the zapruder film sees that his head goes back and to the left.

I know that you likely got your start on this topic by being brainwashed by Hollywood and Oliver Stone. But it has been proven to you countless times that Kennedy's head jerks forward immediately upon impact. You have seen the two frames and yet you continue to deny this fact. Why?

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

there you go again ignoring what EXPERTS say.

What experts?

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

any serious researcher knows the zapruder film has been altered.

Baseless claim.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

my guess that those people on the side of zapruders why they are standing still is that they had to alter that side to show this fake film of his head going forward with the fake blog but why do you ask me,im no photo expert.

My point exactly.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

now HERE I admit I CAN only speculate cause I did not alter the film.oh and just so you know that i am not avoding names Jack White based in dallas is the photo expert that exposed the zapruder film being altered.

Now we're getting somewhere. Provide me a link to everything I need to know about Jack White's position.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

but you'll ignore that just like you have the dallas doctors so again,why bother with you?

Hard to ignore "dallas doctors" that you haven't even provided.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

I know you dont know what the dallas doctors saw because you have done no research into this.

I can only assume that you don't either, because you're incapable of backing up your claims.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

this you can count on the last time me replying to your pathetic ramblings and lies because as i got to say for the hundreth time,you obviusly slept through junior high school science classes because you are clearly ignorant when it comes to the laws of physics and for the hundreth time,

Repetetive; more empty fluff and rhetoric.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

you only SELECTED PARTS of my posts i asked you to on that page that had that long paragraph of those two ladies who said they wernt down the stairs and said the warren commission altered their times frames of testimony

I'm sure you'll have no problem proving these claims then.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

and many other points i brought up,you failed to addresd that

Tell me every single point I have "failed" to address and I will address them.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

or the evidence in the videos

You mean the internet videos? You can describe to me their content, and you can back up all the claims with credible sources that verify that what the internet video says is accurate. If you're incapable of doing that, I can just assume that your internet video is fabricated.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

proving you have ZERO debating skills

I'm not the one who has trouble backing up my wild exaggerated claims.

Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job

have fun talking to yourself whcih is as we both know, is what you will do,replying to this post as though I will read it.

I only came back this time to see what pathetic ramblings you would come up with this time to avoid defeat and as always,you did not dissapoint. Like i said,i dont debate with people who refuse to address evidence and facts in a video because they know they cant counter it or SELECT PARTS of points to debate but ignores others.have fun trolling.you wont get me to take your bait and play your game anymore.Im done.

Repetetive; more empty fluff and rhetoric.

[quote=Woogs;1060944602]

How is the possibility of Saudi Arabia being involved in the terrorist attacks a can of worms? You don't believe the terrorists carried out the attacks. You truthers can never get all your various conflicting theories straight.

question for you Patriot911:


If the 911 hijackers were Saudi Arabians, why did we invade Saddamm in Iraq instead of Saudi Arabia?

Can you answer this without biting down so hard on your lip?

I'm lying about nothing. I back up my claims with credible sources. You don't.


I'd simply ask for the definition of "credible" but that would be pointless. Credible means whatever they want it to mean I guess. Their own individual standards I suppose.

[quote=4Horsemen;1060949251]

Originally Posted by Patriot911

question for you Patriot911:


If the 911 hijackers were Saudi Arabians, why did we invade Saddamm in Iraq instead of Saudi Arabia?

Can you answer this without biting down so hard on your lip?

That one is very easy, especially if one doesn't have one's head up one's ass.

We didn't go after Saddam because of 9/11.

BRILLIANT!

We also didn't invade Saudi Arabia because a handful of their citizens did something. That is extremely retarded. How do you dream up this (*)(*)(*)(*)? You seem very good at it.

Originally Posted by 4Horsemen

Silverstain's money is not "in the red" by no stretch. Do you realize how much property the guy has in NYC? He's in competition with the Donald Trumpster for Top Landlord of New York. .



Money talks. dead men don't.



What brought B7 down then? aging pier and beams?...lol...or maybe the shaking of the ground from the Twin Towers shoook it down?...LOL




I love how ignorance shows it ugly head. I get to stomp it out.

LISTEN, YOU have no proof that jet fuel fire alone brought the Towers down. Jet fuel doesn't get hot enough to melt metal or it would be unsafe to put in the planes themselves to use or you would see planes dropping every day from the fuel getting too hot in the lines and melting the fuselage.

hint hint, the Twin Towers were built to be BOMB PROOF. so a plane crashing into the top portion is not going to bring 2 towering buildings STRAIGHT DOWN. if anything, the speed and force impact of the plane should've only knocked out the windows, which it did.

YOu don't get a STRAIGHT DOWN DROP from melting metal columns anyway. the building will rock from side to side crumbling as it falls. the Twin Towers went straight down as if into a hole.

There is no such thing as "bomb proof".

The WTC Towers were built to resist being hit by the largest airliner that existed at the time they were designed. That is the Boeing 707.

The airliners that hit the WTC Towers were modern widebodies. Far, far heavier than a 707.

And remember, the jet fuel from the airliners merely STARTED the fires in the WTC Towers. Once they started they fed on the tremendous amount of combustable material inside the buildings.

And remember, steel doesn't have to melt before it becomes unable to support a building.

Steel loses 50% of its load bearing strength at a temperature far, far below its melting point.

[quote=Patriot911;1060949277]

Originally Posted by 4Horsemen

That one is very easy, especially if one doesn't have one's head up one's ass.

We didn't go after Saddam because of 9/11.

BRILLIANT!

We also didn't invade Saudi Arabia because a handful of their citizens did something. That is extremely retarded. How do you dream up this (*)(*)(*)(*)? You seem very good at it.

Excuse me idiot, but unless you were snoozing when 911 happend, Bush immediately got our troops ready to do battle IN IRAQ...why?

AND...Bush stated "Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists" and the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, so that meant the nation of Saudi Arabia, which was home to the hijackers, should've been attacked, right?

Forget the "handful of bad apples" nonsense. WE WENT TO WAR YOU MORON!


AND WE WENT TO WAR WITH THE WRONG COUNTRY ON TOP OF THAT.


How do you explain that gross mis-step in judgement by our Government that got over 4,000 of our soldier boys killed?


NOw that I got you cornered, you can give it up. I won't rest until you give me the best lie you can come up with because the truth has already escaped you.

[quote=4Horsemen;1060949369]

Originally Posted by Patriot911

Excuse me idiot, but unless you were snoozing when 911 happend, Bush immediately got our troops ready to do battle IN IRAQ...why?

AND...Bush stated "Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists" and the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, so that meant the nation of Saudi Arabia, which was home to the hijackers, should've been attacked, right?

Forget the "handful of bad apples" nonsense. WE WENT TO WAR YOU MORON!


AND WE WENT TO WAR WITH THE WRONG COUNTRY ON TOP OF THAT.


How do you explain that gross mis-step in judgement by our Government that got over 4,000 of our soldier boys killed?


NOw that I got you cornered, you can give it up. I won't rest until you give me the best lie you can come up with because the truth has already escaped you.

Strange...Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 though. You miss that part?

Originally Posted by Dayton3

There is no such thing as "bomb proof".

The WTC Towers were built to resist being hit by the largest airliner that existed at the time they were designed. That is the Boeing 707.

The airliners that hit the WTC Towers were modern widebodies. Far, far heavier than a 707.

And remember, the jet fuel from the airliners merely STARTED the fires in the WTC Towers. Once they started they fed on the tremendous amount of combustable material inside the buildings.

And remember, steel doesn't have to melt before it becomes unable to support a building.

Steel loses 50% of its load bearing strength at a temperature far, far below its melting point.

All of that mumbo jumbo talk still doesn't explain the STRAIGHT DOWN DROP.

ONLY a Controlled Demo can do that. not a random fire.

I also take it that you've never seen the building dropping in slo-motion? if so, you'd see the horizontal blast charges clear as day. even see people hopelessly jumping to their deaths

Originally Posted by Patriot911

How is the possibility of Saudi Arabia being involved in the terrorist attacks a can of worms? You don't believe the terrorists carried out the attacks. You truthers can never get all your various conflicting theories straight.

I never said what I believe other than that I don't believe the official story. Are you trying to tell me what I believe?

Go troll someone else's posts.