Page 5 of 74 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 737

Thread: Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

  1. Default

    If want a real conspriacy to 9/11. Here you go.

    The year 2001, The disclosure project, an organisation created to reveal UFOS. Gave a historical press conference. Four months later, 9/11 happened!
    When the seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think the sardines will be thrown into the sea.


  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woogs View Post
    I know we were not told the truth about 9/11.

    To me, the best evidence is with the Pentagon and the plane that supposedly hit it. Take a look at the 2 videos. In the first one, explain how it could be that a 757 loaded with fuel could have done so little damage. And where's the rest of the plane? Did it get swallowed up by the building? There's no wreckage on the grounds outside, either.

    In the second video, I challenge anyone to look at that security tape and show me a jet airliner hitting the building. Look at it it as many times as you want, frame by frame. There isn't one!! What you see is something much smaller than a 757 hitting the building and it comes into view at the 24 second mark. Go ahead...look.
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8"]911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 - YouTube[/ame]

    Explain how a blurry security camera that appears to be filming around 4 fps could possibly be used to accurately discern an object flying 700 mph into a building.
    Explain all the eye-witnesses who saw a 757 crash into the pentagon.
    Explain where all of the people on Flight 77 went. Have they taken a 10 year vacation to Antarctica?
    Explain pictures of the wreckage around the pentagon that show 757 debris.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk"]9/11 Debunked: Pentagon Flight 77 Photo Evidence - YouTube[/ame]
    Last edited by Dr. Righteous; Feb 26 2012 at 04:08 PM.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoytmonger View Post
    I personally know people in my industry that helped to rebuild the Pentagon, they received a plaque when it was done that included a piece of the aircraft.
    The Pentagon is built like a fort.
    True the aircraft pieces could be from any aircraft, but I doubt it.
    I find the possibility that the US trained the "terrorists" to commit the crime a more plausible explanation (especially since the public evidence suggests they trained in the US).
    Now this is a more believable explanation. No doubt that al qaeda was trained by US forces in the late 70s/early 80s. but still, i'd like to see evidence that the US govt trained them for the purpose of carrying out the 9/11 attacks.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NetworkCitizen View Post
    When there's a cover-up, there will be a lot of theories that come about, right? What are we left with other than theories?

    C'mon, your kindergarten teacher lied to you.

    9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”
    That is nowhere close to being evidence of direct govt involvement in 911.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DDave View Post
    Forgive me if I am splitting hairs, but I find your choice of words interesting. In the article that I read http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MN9P1N9M0B.DTL I see the FBI involved in a sting operation after receiving a tip. The phrase "behind the Capitol bombing" seems to imply that the FBI planned the entire thing from the start.
    They did. FBI members pretended to be al Qaeda members from the start. They conceived the plan and entrapped that El Khalifi dude. Obviously the plot was never actually going to be executed. But it was in fact cooked up by the FBI, the El Khalifi dude was the only one who was serious about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by DDave View Post
    I think this . . .

    has more to do with this . . .

    than some sinister plot actually plan and execute the events of 9/11.
    I agree, you are correct.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NetworkCitizen View Post
    Maybe so, but we still don't know. Therefore, it is ridiculous the attacks from the mainstains media in the way they've treated "truthers".

    Yeah, we want the entire truth of their security failures if that is the only thing they were hiding. But...they're hiding.
    There's a difference between wanting the full story about what the government knew about 9/11 and when it knew it, than claiming that the government directly hatched 9/11 and used target controlled demolitions, murdering 3000 innocent Americans in cold blood.

  7. Default

    http://www.corbettreport.com/ptech-a...-911-software/

    In that audio documentary, we featured a clip from Indira Singh’s presentation to the Citizens Commission on 9/11. If you want to refresh yourself with that information, please listen to Episode 31 of The Corbett Report, starting at [0:16:31] and ending at [0:27:36]. That clip, which we featured in that earlier episode of The Corbett Report, featured some of Indira Singh’s startling testimony about the information that she gleaned when she was working at J.P. Morgan-Chase.

    Singh was hired as a consultant for J.P. Morgan-Chase to develop the next generation of business architecture enterprise software. The software she was seeking to implement at J.P. Morgan-Chase, one of the largest financial institutions in the world, was specialized, cutting-edge risk architecture software, that would essentially be artificially intelligent and capable of scanning through the millions of transactions taking place across the J.P. Morgan-Chase institution in real time, monitoring these transactions for suspicious activity such as rogue trading; and would then be able to alert the proper people within the J.P. Morgan institution to the problem; and potentially even stop the transactions from taking place.

    The importance, sensitivity, and sophistication of any such software necessarily led Ms. Singh to seek out the true leaders in the enterprise architecture software industry. Her research and due diligence into the issue, led her to a company called PTech.

    As the senior risk-management consultant for one of the largest financial institutions in the world, Ms. Singh knew to trust credible, proven sources of third-party software. That is why PTech’s roster of clients immediately put them in the top echelon of software providers.

    PTech’s clients included some of the most sensitive organizations and agencies in the United States government, including NATO, The U.S. Armed Forces, Congress, The Department of Energy, The Department of Justice, The FBI, Customs, The FAA, The IRS, The Secret Service, and the White House.

    This sterling roster of clients made Indira Singh very eager to take a look at PTech software. However, when the PTech representatives arrived at the J.P. Morgan-Chase offices to display and present their software, Ms. Singh knew there was something wrong right away.


    Interesting! So many false whistle-blowers! Nothing to see here, move along.

    This nation has been compromised!
    Last edited by NetworkCitizen; Feb 26 2012 at 04:19 PM.
    The State has never been created by a "social contract"; it has always been born in conquest and exploitation.

    -Rothbard

    .

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoytmonger View Post
    Watch the last video of the former FBI Chief. Not only does he say the FBI supplied the bomb but that the FBI and CIA are responsible for many of the foreign "terror" attacks overseas against US targets.
    It also states that the same FBI special agent supervising the 1993 attack was involved in the Kenyan bombing of the US embassy.
    OK. So your source is a single FBI agent claiming that the FBI supplied the bomb for the WTC attack in 93. Is that evidence that government was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks?

    Quote Originally Posted by hoytmonger View Post
    Don't forget that Kennedy was shot three times with one "magic" bullet.
    The "magic bullet" was not magic at all. There was only one shooter and it was Oswald in the book depository building. Kennedy was hit by two bullets, one of them hit Connoly and Kennedy. Proven by ballistics tests and watching the Zapruder film.
    Last edited by Dr. Righteous; Feb 26 2012 at 04:22 PM.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeneralZod View Post
    If want a real conspriacy to 9/11. Here you go.

    The year 2001, The disclosure project, an organisation created to reveal UFOS. Gave a historical press conference. Four months later, 9/11 happened!
    What in the hell do UFO's have to do with 9/11?

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Righteous View Post
    What in the hell do UFO's have to do with 9/11?
    I have read many conspriacys to 911. The so called inside job and frankly they bore me. I like the surreal, the conspiracies from minds like david icke and other greats.
    When the seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think the sardines will be thrown into the sea.

Page 5 of 74 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Evidence for God, Evidence for freewill just the same
    By prospect in forum Religion & Philosophy
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: Nov 23 2011, 06:50 AM
  2. Inside/Outside
    By PatrickT in forum Opinion POLLS
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Aug 21 2011, 02:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks