
Originally Posted by
Woogs
Well, there's the damage that has to be taken into account along with reports of explosions. The damage in the lobby shows no evidence of a fire(ball), which was the official explanation. The damage in the basement is what it is. One can make what they want of it. It can't simply be ignored, though.
Just a comment to something you mentioned in a post to someone else:
While a fireman may not be trained in explosives and therefore not an expert, it's quite a stretch to suggest it could have been an electrical transformer. I've heard quite a few of them blow and they are not bomb-like in any way. I would assume that most firemen have heard these as well. Not to say it couldn't have been something else, but it being a transformer is not likely. To go by what some theorists say (controlled demo), these explosions could have been part of that. They're not 'bombs', but are explosives.
The bottom line is that we could sit here forever and not get anywhere. There are enough holes in the official version, however, to see that if there ever was a case that need to be thoroughly investigated, this one is it.
the problem there is that there WERE some firement that were witnesses trained in explosives.lol one of them went on record saying-their explanation is an insult to the 9/11 familys.I know the difference between the sound of explosives and the sounds of other things to know when explosives have been planted.
did you know about that fireman quote by chance?
five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.
Bookmarks