Page 54 of 74 FirstFirst ... 4450515253545556575864 ... LastLast
Results 531 to 540 of 737

Thread: Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

  1. Icon10

    Quote Originally Posted by Woogs View Post
    Well, there's the damage that has to be taken into account along with reports of explosions. The damage in the lobby shows no evidence of a fire(ball), which was the official explanation. The damage in the basement is what it is. One can make what they want of it. It can't simply be ignored, though.

    Just a comment to something you mentioned in a post to someone else:

    While a fireman may not be trained in explosives and therefore not an expert, it's quite a stretch to suggest it could have been an electrical transformer. I've heard quite a few of them blow and they are not bomb-like in any way. I would assume that most firemen have heard these as well. Not to say it couldn't have been something else, but it being a transformer is not likely. To go by what some theorists say (controlled demo), these explosions could have been part of that. They're not 'bombs', but are explosives.

    The bottom line is that we could sit here forever and not get anywhere. There are enough holes in the official version, however, to see that if there ever was a case that need to be thoroughly investigated, this one is it.
    the problem there is that there WERE some firement that were witnesses trained in explosives.lol one of them went on record saying-their explanation is an insult to the 9/11 familys.I know the difference between the sound of explosives and the sounds of other things to know when explosives have been planted. did you know about that fireman quote by chance?
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.


  2. Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by philxx View Post
    Yes it is the form of Faith thunkin' called Blind faith in Government.
    amen to that.so very true.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  3. Thumbs down

    Quote Originally Posted by SkullKrusher View Post
    Just like there is zero evidence that anyone one else, except Lee Harvey Oswald, was involved in the JFK assassination.

    And there is zero evidence that Oliver North had anything to do with Iran Contra.

    There is also, zero evidence that Richard Nixon was involved with Cuban CIA operatives in that "whole Bay of Pigs thing". It must have been someone dubing in Nixons voice on the tapes, and the Watergate break in had nothing at all to do with JFK assassination.

    The CIA has nothing at all to do, what so ever, with assassinations that happen around the world., or interrogations using torture. Likewise, Israeli Mossad, is a peaceful information seeking organization.

    2+2=5 Repeat

    Now, what is 2+2= ? The answer is 5 yes? WRONG.

    2+2=3 Now Repeat. You cannot have your pudding, until you eat your meat. How can you have your pudding if you do not eat your meat?

    All in all, its just another Brick in the Wall.
    dont you got anything better to do than to tell obvious lies?
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 9/11 was an inside job View Post
    the problem there is that there WERE some firement that were witnesses trained in explosives.lol one of them went on record saying-their explanation is an insult to the 9/11 familys.I know the difference between the sound of explosives and the sounds of other things to know when explosives have been planted. did you know about that fireman quote by chance?
    Link to the source please?
    How nice it would be if everyone judged their party by the same high standards that they use to judge the other party.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DDave View Post
    Please explain how those are contradictory.
    I'm not sure how to make it any more clear without sounding patronizing, so if I do, please forgive me.

    We agree planes flew in to the buildings, correct?

    We know both Towers came down less than 90 minutes after being hit by planes.

    You are claiming the official story is true and that means that planes alone brought down the Towers.

    If the planes were sufficient, why would it take "months" of rigging explosives to bring down the same Towers?

  6. Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Serfin' USA View Post
    The government isn't particularly good at holding itself accountable.
    thats why this investigation was a joke with Bush and cheney not having to testify under oath and behind closed doors together.what a pathetic investigation.They should have been put under a lie detector as well as the other neocons in the Bush administration who pulled this off should have been.
    Good post I have to say.The investigation was such a joke,it was the government investigating themselves.lol.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Serfin' USA View Post
    Basically. We could design government to be more accountable, but unfortunately, we haven't been very successful with that so far.

    There are aspects to the government that actually do work well, like the FAA, but unfortunately, they seem to be more the exception to the rule.
    Boy we sure havent been very successful at it.Thats the truth.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
    You can't be serious.

    It is vastly easier to ram airliners into skyscrapers than rig them (by hand) for a controlled demolition.

    You can't make that stupid a mistake.

    I assume you're just trolling.
    I have lived in Dayton. Please change your user name or have your posts edited prior to posting them. You are embarrassing a cool city.

  9. Icon17

    Quote Originally Posted by deanberryministries View Post
    Oh, is it unimportant where you were when a crime was committed? Why is that the first thing a cop asks you?

    So, if the head of the 9/11 Commission is a "jew", everybody in all the major gatekeeping positions were "jews", and the aftermath of 9/11 benefits primarily "jews", Americans should see nothing amiss?

    Soldiers, how about when the "jews" murdered 40 of our AMERICAN sailors when they attacked the USS Liberty then blamed it on Muslims to drag us into the Six Day War? Let's hear your excuse for that.

    It's time to decide if you're REALLY an American Patriot OR NOT! If you are, you need to know who your friends are.
    the coincidence theorists ignore little details like that.Kinda like how they ignore that all three buildings owned by jew silverstein were the only ones to collapse due to fire in the first time in history and other neighboring buildings next to the trade towers damaged 100 times worse did not collapse.you just got to love the logic of the coincidence theorists.all just a major coincidence.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

  10. Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by deanberryministries View Post
    Why did the other buildings come down as easily as if it was a demolition but Bldg 7 had to be forcibly brought down?
    The Bush dupes always ignore that all three towers came down in the same way controlled demolitions do.they never touch bld 7 because its the crux of the 9/11 coverup commission they cant get around.
    five 9/11 official conspiracy theory apologists on ignore.Reason? they lie when they are defeated and wont look at the evidence.

Page 54 of 74 FirstFirst ... 4450515253545556575864 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Evidence for God, Evidence for freewill just the same
    By prospect in forum Religion & Philosophy
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: Nov 23 2011, 06:50 AM
  2. Inside/Outside
    By PatrickT in forum Opinion POLLS
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Aug 21 2011, 02:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks