Thread: Pictures Of Trayvon Martin Are Fakes

I am sure we have all seen this image of an alleged Trayvon making the rounds:



Problem is, it ain't him. Those two photos can be found on a Facebook page of a kid of the same name.
That kid lists his school as being Myers Middle School, which is in New York.

Trayvon's Wiki page lists his home as Miami, and his school is Miami Carol City High School. There is a difference between Middle School and High School.

Miami is a long way from New York. The picture of Trayvon is simply from a Facebook page of a kid, who happens to share Trayvon's first name.

So, that is that. Lets stop posting pictures of a kid who shares the same name, okay?

Link anything? Alrighty then...

Hang on, I shall provide the link to the Facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/people/Tray...00001791912868

There you go. Both images can be found there.

This guy is just paying tribute to trayvon by sporting his name and putting his pictures up.

Originally Posted by RiseAgainst

This guy is just paying tribute to trayvon by sporting his name and putting his pictures up.

You have proof of this? Note where this kid attends school - in New York, not in Miami.

QUESTION: Why didn't the Lame Stream media .....The NY Times, specifically......... publish the fact that Zimmerman had a bloody face and a scalp wound immediately after the shooting incident of Trayvon ???

This info came out on the "McLaughlin Group" show on Sat Mar 24, 2012.

I am still leaning towards the possibility that Zimmerman didn't use good judgment in tailing Trayvon after the cops told him not to do that ....... however, the subsequent scuffle seems to indicate that Trayvon was kicking Zimmy's butt when he shot Trayvon.

My question is this.....Regardless of Zimmerman's fault for the incident (my opinion subject to additional facts), the NY Times still was obviously stacking the deck against Zimmerman AND THAT IS CONTEMPTIBLE LIEberrhoidal JOURNALISM typical of NY Times.

Originally Posted by loong

QUESTION: Why didn't the Lame Stream media .....The NY Times, specifically......... publish the fact that Zimmerman had a bloody face and a scalp wound immediately after the shooting incident of Trayvon ???

This info came out on the "McLaughlin Group" show on Sat Mar 24, 2012.

I am still leaning towards the possibility that Zimmerman didn't use good judgment in tailing Trayvon after the cops told him not to do that ....... however, the subsequent scuffle seems to indicate that Trayvon was kicking Zimmy's butt when he shot Trayvon.

My question is this.....Regardless of Zimmerman's fault for the incident (my opinion subject to additional facts), the NY Times still was obviously stacking the deck against Zimmerman AND THAT IS CONTEMPTIBLE LIEberrhoidal JOURNALISM typical of NY Times.

So a mugger can attack you and when he kills you he can claim self defense.

Originally Posted by RiseAgainst

This guy is just paying tribute to trayvon by sporting his name and putting his pictures up.

Haha..... you demand proof for something someone else says, and then when you get it you come out with this. Ridiculous

Y'know the funny thing about those pictures ... no, he still wouldn't look scary, and even if he did, it's not okay to shoot scary people just because they're scary.

C'mon. All you badass-libertarian gun-toting folks must think you look pretty tough, right? Do you really want it to be okay to shoot you just 'cause you intimidate others?

Originally Posted by loong

QUESTION: Why didn't the Lame Stream media .....The NY Times, specifically......... publish the fact that Zimmerman had a bloody face and a scalp wound immediately after the shooting incident of Trayvon ???
...

Question. Why did the racist cops not record the "fact" that Zimmerman was grazed and bleeding in their initial report but add it later?