Religion is an incredibly misoginistic construct, isn't it?
All of them.
As far as the RC Church goes, I really cannot see a good and fair reason why a women
cannot or should not be a priest.
The only logical argument you can make against it, would be through the eyes of those that want to retain it as some sort of all male boys club. A kind of Bohemian Grove, but with Holy Water rather than an Owl.
Since there are probably as many, if not more RC females as there are men in this world, it seems rather amiss to me, that not one single RC lady can ever be considered for Priesthood.
She can 'be a good Catholic',
the best, better than any of the males around her, and yet, despite that, she cannot take that on to another level, and be a Priest.
I suppose they do have the Female Division, and call them Nuns, but Priests carry out a totally different role.
I cannot see that a women could never possess the 'right qualities', to be a priest, whatever they are meant to be?
I cannot see that she would be any less dedicated to her faith than a man?
I cannot see that she would try less hard for her 'flock', than the male Priest?
And there may be another benefit to the gradual increase in female Priests.
A
hidden benefit, if you will.
Now, the RC Church has taken a real battering, of EPIC proportions, over the countless cases of paedophile priests being permitted to get away with their deviant acts, by the RC hierarchy, who would cover it up, send them to a new parish, where the people would be totally ignorant to the fact that the Priest was a known child molestor.
Statistically, a male is many times more likely to sexually abuse any child than a women is.
You can go find that out, it is written, a man is MANY more times likely.
I have no idea why, but it is what it is.
It is logical to then think that with female priests, this fact would follow on, ergo, more female priests = less odds of priest being a paedo.
Jack
Bookmarks