Thread: WH Insider - Obama In Serious Trouble

Originally Posted by Think for myself

Indeed, you can, and I have decided, given the in credible inaccuracies, snarkiness, nastiness, gossiping, and g flat out untruths that your White House Insider is fictional. Not a single claim that they have ever made has ever turned out to be true. I am n ot sure why you would cite a source that is so very consistently inaccurate, but you are certainly free to do so.

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

Sorry, but YOU deciding something doesn't mean a thing... except desperation to protect your beloved president.

Originally Posted by Think for myself

I am not sure what that has to do with the thread topic.

The source you cite has a long history of being inaccurate. In fact, I think inaccurate is a bit of an understatement, as that woudl allow at least for a smidgen of accuracy. I think perhaps non-accurate or anti-accurate would be better adjectives your source.

You are free to use whatever source you like. However, I will, given the mood, inclination, and the outrageous nature of the latest claim by your source, perhaps question the ongoing anti-accuracy of your source's claims.

Now couple that with the incredibly sniveling and snarky nature of these fictional exchanges, how your source complains about the most petty of imaginary things, and I will point that out too.

A long history that exists only in your mind. Like I said, don't like it... don't read it.

Originally Posted by WalterSobchak

Quite possibly my favorite SMW arguments to the nay sayers that don't believe this fictional WH Insider. LOLOL If you don't share the same incredible hatred for the current POTUS as SMW has........................... .you are a sheeple! LMAO

Oh, and how dare we have the audacity to ask the OP to share just one, 1, uno smidgen of proof that her favorite source has been accurate in and we get called weak with no emotional filter.

Tell me SMW, do ALL of you Liberal/Obama hating cons see the entire world either black or white?

Don't like the topic? Don't read it.

Originally Posted by Montoya

And what's funny is this alleged insider seems to always agree spot in with SMW's opinions.

Don't like the topic? Don't read it.

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

A long history that exists only in your mind. Like I said, don't like it... don't read it.

No, a long history that exists here on the forum.

Your "insider" once made the incredible claim that there was a massive scandal coming out of the White House in the near future. I, hilariously, tracked it for over 100 days, and the scandal that your outsider claimed never happened.,

Allow me to reiterate that. Your insider was utterly and completely wrong. Dead wrong, the opposite of right.

So do not insult me and say that it only exists in my mind when I am clearly right and you are clearly wrong. If you do not want your consistently anti-accurate source to be scrutinized and held up as the bad partisan fiction that it is then do not post it where I have the opportunity to read it. If you do not want to hear what I say, put me on ignore, but rest assured I will take your source to task as often as I feel like it.

Originally Posted by Think for myself

No, a long history that exists here on the forum.

Your "insider" once made the incredible claim that there was a massive scandal coming out of the White House in the near future. I, hilariously, tracked it for over 100 days, and the scandal that your outsider claimed never happened.,

Allow me to reiterate that. Your insider was utterly and completely wrong. Dead wrong, the opposite of right.

So do not insult me and say that it only exists in my mind when I am clearly right and you are clearly wrong. If you do not want your consistently anti-accurate source to be scrutinized and held up as the bad partisan fiction that it is then do not post it where I have the opportunity to read it. If you do not want to hear what I say, put me on ignore, but rest assured I will take your source to task as often as I feel like it.

“He owes them for everything. Everything he’s got – they gave to him. Everything. The guy’s Manchurian to the shoes on his feet.” -WHI

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

The Insider claims to work inside the WH with Obama. Big difference in reporting what you witness and not just what you think.

(Nice to see you around, presluc... LTNS)

Thanks , nice to be here,

Well we pretty much know why "DEEP THROAT " was hiding his identity.

However this "Insider keeps saying "claims to work in the WH with Obama"

I try to keep an open mind but I have some trouble with flashbacks like these.
Reasons to invade Iraq without UN approval.
UHH.. smoking gun
UHH .. mushroom cloud
UHH.. dealing with Al Queada
UHH... that man tried to kill my daddy.
All these to were claims in the end, according to the leader of this WAR, the real reason.. BAD INTELLIGENCE..

So call me skeptical, call me paranoid but I would like conformation from the "INSIDER".

Next thing ya know this" Insider" will be putting up a banner saying "ELECTIONS OVER "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" ROMNEY WINS".
Say that's already been done ain't it, I mean the "Mission Accomplished" part?

Originally Posted by presluc

Thanks , nice to be here,

Well we pretty much know why "DEEP THROAT " was hiding his identity.

However this "Insider keeps saying "claims to work in the WH with Obama"

I try to keep an open mind but I have some trouble with flashbacks like these.
Reasons to invade Iraq without UN approval.
UHH.. smoking gun
UHH .. mushroom cloud
UHH.. dealing with Al Queada
UHH... that man tried to kill my daddy.
All these to were claims in the end, according to the leader of this WAR, the real reason.. BAD INTELLIGENCE..

So call me skeptical, call me paranoid but I would like conformation from the "INSIDER".

Next thing ya know this" Insider" will be putting up a banner saying "ELECTIONS OVER "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" ROMNEY WINS".
Say that's already been done ain't it, I mean the "Mission Accomplished" part?

I don't think he said he works with Obama but is in the circle invited to the WH and does not want to be exposed to get excluded.

Originally Posted by presluc

Thanks , nice to be here,

Well we pretty much know why "DEEP THROAT " was hiding his identity.

However this "Insider keeps saying "claims to work in the WH with Obama"

I try to keep an open mind but I have some trouble with flashbacks like these.
Reasons to invade Iraq without UN approval.
UHH.. smoking gun
UHH .. mushroom cloud
UHH.. dealing with Al Queada
UHH... that man tried to kill my daddy.
All these to were claims in the end, according to the leader of this WAR, the real reason.. BAD INTELLIGENCE..

So call me skeptical, call me paranoid but I would like conformation from the "INSIDER".

Next thing ya know this" Insider" will be putting up a banner saying "ELECTIONS OVER "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" ROMNEY WINS".
Say that's already been done ain't it, I mean the "Mission Accomplished" part?

Well, if you go back to the very beginning of the Insider, he claims to be an operative in the Democratic Party who worked hard to get Hillary elected, was sorely disappointed when she didn't win... but was fortunate enough to hang onto his job. He's never gone into detail about his position (understandably), but he has access to the WH and contacts thru which he 'hears things.'

Nobody is being asked to believe he's on the level. But if he's not, he's certainly spent a LOT of time and energy on these interviews for absolutely no gain. Except to have jerks on a message board deny he exists.

So call me rational, but here's how I see it.

UHH... WI told us a yr ago Barack is lazy and spends all his time in his second floor 'study' with the big screen & sofas. (across the hall from ValJar's office)
UHH... Book The Amateur comes out and from reports from WH staff, the author claims Barack is lazy and spends all his time in the second floor 'study' with the big screen & sofas. (across the hall from ValJar's Office)

More reality

June 14, 2012

Publisher says media blackballed best-selling anti-Obama book

Despite being at the top of the New York Times best-seller list for three consecutive weeks, Regnery Publishing says the so-called mainstream media has blackballed "The Amateur," a new anti-Obama book written by former New York Times Magazine editor Ed Klein, the Washington Examiner reported Wednesday.

“Klein’s got the hottest book in America and is getting blackballed by the networks and other national news outlets,” said Keith Appell, a publicist for Regnery Publishing.

“This is beyond bias. This is an in-kind contribution to the Obama campaign,” he added.

Nothing that happened in the Bush Administration can hold a candle to what we're seeing today. Bush had no 'insiders' revealing what a snake he was... because he wasn't.

Barack is.

Like Hoosier said... it's interesting when the pieces start falling into place.

So lets see if I get this straight. The OP wants to start a thread on a PUBLIC forum for all to discuss. But the OP does NOT want to discuss the topic of said thread if you do not share the same opinion as the OP.

Why not just talk about it in your Quorum if you only want to have people agree with you in these discussions?

Jerks on a message board who claim that a fictional "insider" with a clear track record of zero accuracy, but shows an uncanny similarity of smallminded vile opinions to "his" supporters, are merely braying to the subverted.