Thread: OBAMASCARE: Electing Mitt Romney is the only chance to avoid USA bankruptcy

Originally Posted by Johnny-C

I either like what you say, or I do not. (I use the button accordingly.)

Your dislikes are off topic. Perhaps try the likes button.

Originally Posted by Marshal

Your dislikes are off topic. Perhaps try the likes button.

Sweet soft mittens, and sparkling kittens... Blue green Robbins, and bombadeering pigeons... No! Wait!

Folks, Romney isn't going to fix America the way it should be fixed. All he will do is further promote the interests of those already wealthy. He embraces (or supports politically) the old, tested and FAILED theories of wealth trickling-down from people like him, translating into people getting 'jobs'.

We already know that hasn't been the trend, though Americans have surely FUNNELED massive amounts of wealth toward the top 1-5% for decades; the stats don't lie. The rich got richer and the workers lost more jobs than ever.

Romney isn't going to do a darned thing (for the bulk of Americans), but practice supply-side economics as he is commanded to by those who PAID for his election.

Just like every other program in the past century, you will forget about it in couple years and move on to your next grand conspiracy theory. Why do you guys live your lives with so much fear? Obamacare isn't some master plan drafted by Obama. It's been talked about in America for decades, implemented in states, and used in many developed countries across the world. Your guys fear of everything is amazing!

Originally Posted by akphidelt2007

Just like every other program in the past century, you will forget about it in couple years and move on to your next grand conspiracy theory. Why do you guys live your lives with so much fear? Obamacare isn't some master plan drafted by Obama. It's been talked about in America for decades, implemented in states, and used in many developed countries across the world. Your guys fear of everything is amazing!

We have been correct in our fears. You are the guys cheering as the roller coaster goes down.

Originally Posted by Marshal

[size="3"]Electing Mitt Romney is the only chance to avoid USA bankruptcy

Between the two turds I prefer Obamney, for true color and bigger contrast sitting in the White house

Hmmm, the left used to be for the poor, now they are for the middle class, or better put, themselves.

Originally Posted by akphidelt2007

Just like every other program in the past century, you will forget about it in couple years and move on to your next grand conspiracy theory. Why do you guys live your lives with so much fear? Obamacare isn't some master plan drafted by Obama. It's been talked about in America for decades, implemented in states, and used in many developed countries across the world. Your guys fear of everything is amazing!

You are right, it wasn't drafted by Obama, all he did was sign it and become responsible for it, kinda like Bush and the Patriot Act.

Nothing like unfunded mandates to make the left become soooo defensive. You would think it wasn't their money.

Originally Posted by Marshal

Obama hasn't helped the Middle Class.

There is a big difference between someone who hasn't helped when you thought he would, to someone who might help even though you think he wouldn't?

Also... When is this Great American Hypocrisy going to end, and Americans realize they are all duped with false promises and perpetual Corporate Enslavement?

I've noticed--not just about you but other "Mitt" supporters--that many of you completely and totally ignore his record in Massachusetts when telling us that he's an unknown. In the criminal field, your future behavior within society is measured against past transgressions. For example, if you were involved in a violent crime in the past this is taken into account when judging what you might be capable of if released.

Mitt's record in Massachusetts is no different than Obama's as president. What's more, as a business owner we can see how he is able to justify the impact a decision will make upon real people and their lives against the bottom line.

An American president has to look to the 360 million people living here and act in the best interests of all Americans. Our GNP is not bad. Many of the world's top companies are American companies.

So where are our jobs?

We cannot have an economy for all without manufacturing. This is theory proven in history. Free trade with China opened up our companies to an addiction to labor at $.85 an hour. There's no coming back voluntarily unless the oil prices are so high it makes no sense to outsource. Many of the people who are for this seem to not realize that India and China are graduating white collar workers who will do their jobs at a lower cost and eventually put them where the factory workers are now...out of a job.

It's all good at someone else's expense. We can always justify activities when we, ourselves, do not bear the brunt or impact.

No one has shown how this happens in reality--that the rich being rich helps the American middle class. They will cite examples pre-free trade with China and that's like telling me that dinosaur meat can sustain me in winter.

Look at Obama's voting record, Mitt Romney's record in Massachusetts and how he treated employees of his, Ron Paul's voting record, and Gary Johnson's voting record then tell me which ones actually did what they said they would do and showed they were acting in the best interest of Americans.

Then try to convince me with facts that we need Mitt Romney.

Originally Posted by Zosiasmom

I've noticed--not just about you but other "Mitt" supporters--that many of you completely and totally ignore his record in Massachusetts when telling us that he's an unknown. In the criminal field, your future behavior within society is measured against past transgressions. For example, if you were involved in a violent crime in the past this is taken into account when judging what you might be capable of if released.

Mitt's record in Massachusetts is no different than Obama's as president. What's more, as a business owner we can see how he is able to justify the impact a decision will make upon real people and their lives against the bottom line.

An American president has to look to the 360 million people living here and act in the best interests of all Americans. Our GNP is not bad. Many of the world's top companies are American companies.

So where are our jobs?

We cannot have an economy for all without manufacturing. This is theory proven in history. Free trade with China opened up our companies to an addiction to labor at $.85 an hour. There's no coming back voluntarily unless the oil prices are so high it makes no sense to outsource. Many of the people who are for this seem to not realize that India and China are graduating white collar workers who will do their jobs at a lower cost and eventually put them where the factory workers are now...out of a job.

It's all good at someone else's expense. We can always justify activities when we, ourselves, do not bear the brunt or impact.

No one has shown how this happens in reality--that the rich being rich helps the American middle class. They will cite examples pre-free trade with China and that's like telling me that dinosaur meat can sustain me in winter.

Look at Obama's voting record, Mitt Romney's record in Massachusetts and how he treated employees of his, Ron Paul's voting record, and Gary Johnson's voting record then tell me which ones actually did what they said they would do and showed they were acting in the best interest of Americans.

Then try to convince me with facts that we need Mitt Romney.

It is simply ABO (Anybody but Obama).