Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Dependency on Government Now Highest in American History

  1. Default Dependency on Government Now Highest in American History

    Dependency on Government Now Highest in American History.

    It will soon become much worse. In the next 25 years, more than 77 million baby boomers will retire. They will begin collecting checks from Social Security, drawing benefits from Medicare, and relying on Medicaid for long-term care. Who among working Americans will be able to pay the exorbitant taxes required to provide these baby boomers this care?

    As of now, 70 percent of the federal government’s budget goes to individual assistance programs, up dramatically in just the past few years. However, research shows that private, community, and charitable aid helps individuals rise from their difficulties with better success than federal government handouts. Plus, local and private aid is often more effectively distributed.

    At the same time, nearly half of the U.S. population (49.5 percent) does not pay any federal income taxes.

    Analysis and discussion follow.

    This report is based on findings from a Pew Research Center survey conducted last December, among 2,048 adults nationwide, including 808 young adults (ages 18 to 34). The report also draws on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Here is a summary of the key findings:

    Young adults hit hard by the recession. A plurality of the public (41%) believes young adults, rather than middle-aged or older adults, are having the toughest time in today’s economy. An analysis of government economic data suggests that this perception is correct. The recent indicators on the nation’s labor market show a decline in the unemployment rate. Nonetheless, since 2010, the share of young adults ages 18 to 24 currently employed (54%) has been its lowest since the government began collecting these data in 1948. And the gap in employment between the young and all working-age adults—roughly 15 percentage points—is the widest in recorded history.1 In addition, young adults employed full time have experienced a greater drop in weekly earnings (down 6%) than any other age group over the past four years.

    Most (85%) people who are in the workforce say today’s young adults have it harder than their parents did. Large majorities of the public say it’s harder for young adults to reach many of the basic financial goals their parents may have taken for granted. More than eight-in-ten say finding a job is harder for young adults today than it was for their parents’ generation. And at least seven-in-ten say it’s harder now to save for the future (75%), pay for college (71%) or buy a home (69%).

    Tough economic times altering young adults’ daily lives, long-term plans. While negative trends in the labor market have been felt most acutely by the youngest workers, many adults in their late 20s and early 30s have also felt the impact of the weak economy. Among all 18- to 34-year-olds, fully half (49%) say they have taken a job they didn’t want just to pay the bills, with 24% saying they have taken an unpaid job to gain work experience. And more than one-third (35%) say that, as a result of the poor economy, they have gone back to school. Their personal lives have also been affected: 31% have postponed either getting married or having a baby (22% say they have postponed having a baby and 20% have put off getting married). One-in-four (24%) say they have moved back in with their parents after living on their own.

    Adulthood begins later than it used to. In a 1993 Newsweek poll, 80% of parents with young children said children should be financially independent from their parents by the age of 22. Today, only 67% of parents hold that view. Three-in-ten (31%) of today’s parents say children shouldn’t have to be on their own financially until age 25 or later.

    For young adults, bad times don’t trump optimism.
    Among those ages 18 to 34, nearly nine-in-ten (88%) say they either have or earn enough money now or expect they will in the future. Only 9% say they don’t think they will ever have enough to live the life they want. Adults ages 35 and older are much less optimistic—28% say they don’t anticipate making enough money in the future.2 While young people are less likely now than they were before the recession to say they currently have enough income, their level of optimism is undiminished from where it was in 2004.

    Older adults have maintained their standard of living. If any age group has weathered the economic storm better than others, it has been adults ages 65 and older. In a 2004 Pew Research survey, similar shares of young adults (50%), middle-aged adults (52%) and older adults (50%) rated their personal financial situation “excellent” or “good.” By 2011, a large gap had opened up between older adults and everyone else: 54% of older adults gave their personal financial situation a high rating, compared with roughly one-third of younger and middle-aged adults.

    Among the employed, job satisfaction has remained steady… For those young adults who are employed, most are relatively satisfied with their job. Job satisfaction among young workers is roughly the same as it was before the recession and remains somewhat lower than the satisfaction rate among workers ages 35 and older.

    But young workers feel more vulnerable than they used to
    . In a 1998 survey, 65% of 18- to 34-year-olds working full time or part time said they were extremely or very confident that they could find another job if they lost or left their current job.3 The share highly confident fell dramatically to 25% in 2009. It has rebounded somewhat since then (to 43% in the current survey) but is still nowhere near the 1998 level.

    Few young workers see their current job as a “career.” Among all 18- to 34-year-olds, only 30% consider their current job a career. This compares with 52% among workers ages 35 and older. However, the survey suggests that young adults quickly begin to transition from job to career. Among the youngest workers, those ages 18 to 24, only 11% say their job is a career. Among workers ages 25 to 29, the share is three times that (34%). And among those ages 30 to 34, fully half (49%) say they view their job as a career.

    Most young workers say they don’t have the education and training to get ahead. Among 18- to 34-year-olds who are employed, less than half (46%) say they have the education and training necessary to get ahead in their job or career. Among those who are not working, only 27% say they are adequately prepared for the kind of job they want. Having a college degree makes a big difference on this question: 69% of young college graduates who are working say they have the education and training they need to get ahead. This compares with only 39% of those who do not have a degree and are not enrolled in college.

    College enrollment rates are tied to employment declines among the young. A greater share of young adults are enrolled in high school or college today than at any time in recorded history. This increase in enrollment is one reason that fewer young adults are on the job today, but it doesn’t account for all the job losses experienced by this age group in recent years. The Great Recession broadly reduced the employment rate of young adults regardless of whether they were in school. Among those enrolled in school, the employment rate fell from 47.6% in 2007 to 40.7% in 2011. And among those not enrolled in school, it fell from 73.2% to 65.0% over that same period.

    http://www.americanprogress.org/pres...hallenges.html
    Last edited by James Cessna; Jul 17 2012 at 07:31 PM.
    James Cessna

    "If you give a man a fish (socialism), you feed him for a day. It you teach a man to fish (capitalism), you feed him and the people he employs for a lifetime."


  2. Default

    The middle and upper classes get a bigger share of government handouts now than at any point in recent history.

  3. Likes janpor liked this post
  4. Default

    It is a crash to the social system that was long forsee and long ignored, espically since the government taps into Social Security and uses its money on other projects, when it is suppose to just sit their for later on down the road. A perfect example of this is a High School student spending every dime they have throughout high school eventhough they know they will have to pay for college and when college comes around the have no money so they become more and more in debt until they become bankrupt.

  5. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Cessna View Post
    Dependency on Government Now Highest in American History.

    It will soon become much worse. In the next 25 years, more than 77 million baby boomers will retire. They will begin collecting checks from Social Security, drawing benefits from Medicare, and relying on Medicaid for long-term care. Who among working Americans will be able to pay the exorbitant taxes required to provide these baby boomers this care?
    America should have been doing what Austraia has been doing since the early 1990s,, compulsory superannuation for workers. In Australia we have gone one step further, employers contribute a certain percentage of the worker's salary to superannuation schemes. Workers also have to option to contribute.

    Now,, before you get on your high horse and deem this "socialism", employer contributions are now part of the employee's salary package.

    What this means is, if a worker, along with the employer, has contributed to superannuation schemes, more than likely upon retirement, the worker would have built a large enough nest egg to be a self funding retiree. Hence, no government pension.

    Also in Australia, every senior citizen is entited to free medical by way of a senior's card or Medicare. Since this has come into play, there has been a rise in longevity in Australia. Senior citizens are now able to be treated without the financial concerns when seeking medical attention.

    In Australia, senior citizens are treated with respect for many years of contribution to society.
    "The eagle watches from the mountain.
    As the warriors turn into fools.
    And the dice are thrown on sacred ground.
    And they move closer to the truth"

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lizarddust View Post

    America should have been doing what Austraia has been doing since the early 1990s,, compulsory superannuation for workers. In Australia we have gone one step further, employers contribute a certain percentage of the worker's salary to superannuation schemes. Workers also have to option to contribute.

    Now,, before you get on your high horse and deem this "socialism", employer contributions are now part of the employee's salary package.

    What this means is, if a worker, along with the employer, has contributed to superannuation schemes, more than likely upon retirement, the worker would have built a large enough nest egg to be a self funding retiree. Hence, no government pension.

    Also in Australia, every senior citizen is entited to free medical by way of a senior's card or Medicare. Since this has come into play, there has been a rise in longevity in Australia. Senior citizens are now able to be treated without the financial concerns when seeking medical attention.

    In Australia, senior citizens are treated with respect for many years of contribution to society.
    Here is the problem we have in America.

    Our health care system is frequently abused by indigent people and there is nothing we can do about it.

    A crucial statistic

    New Jersey’s Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers founder and family medicine practitioner, Jeffrey Brenner, used medical billing records to find that just 1% of patients accounted for 30% of health care costs in Camden. And that's not all he discovered in the city's three hospitals. He says: "We learned that someone went 113 times in one year. Someone went 324 times in five years. In similar workup in Trenton, they found someone who went 450 times in one year." These were people with complicated medical histories and chronic illnesses. One patient alone racked up $3.5 million in medical bills over a five year period. As Brenner says, :"They're the difficult patients to treat, and no one is being paid and incentivized to pay attention to them."

    What's more, Camden's problem is America's problem. Just 5% of Americans accounted for half of our nation's health care costs in 2009. This is perhaps the crucial statistic to understand about America's health care problem.

    http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn....th-care-issue/
    Last edited by James Cessna; Jul 19 2012 at 04:21 PM.
    James Cessna

    "If you give a man a fish (socialism), you feed him for a day. It you teach a man to fish (capitalism), you feed him and the people he employs for a lifetime."

  7. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Cessna View Post
    Dependency on Government Now Highest in American History.

    It will soon become much worse. In the next 25 years, more than 77 million baby boomers will retire. They will begin collecting checks from Social Security, drawing benefits from Medicare, and relying on Medicaid for long-term care. Who among working Americans will be able to pay the exorbitant taxes required to provide these baby boomers this care?

    As of now, 70 percent of the federal government’s budget goes to individual assistance programs, up dramatically in just the past few years. However, research shows that private, community, and charitable aid helps individuals rise from their difficulties with better success than federal government handouts. Plus, local and private aid is often more effectively distributed.

    At the same time, nearly half of the U.S. population (49.5 percent) does not pay any federal income taxes.

    Analysis and discussion follow.

    This report is based on findings from a Pew Research Center survey conducted last December, among 2,048 adults nationwide, including 808 young adults (ages 18 to 34). The report also draws on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Here is a summary of the key findings:

    Young adults hit hard by the recession. A plurality of the public (41%) believes young adults, rather than middle-aged or older adults, are having the toughest time in today’s economy. An analysis of government economic data suggests that this perception is correct. The recent indicators on the nation’s labor market show a decline in the unemployment rate. Nonetheless, since 2010, the share of young adults ages 18 to 24 currently employed (54%) has been its lowest since the government began collecting these data in 1948. And the gap in employment between the young and all working-age adults—roughly 15 percentage points—is the widest in recorded history.1 In addition, young adults employed full time have experienced a greater drop in weekly earnings (down 6%) than any other age group over the past four years.

    Most (85%) people who are in the workforce say today’s young adults have it harder than their parents did. Large majorities of the public say it’s harder for young adults to reach many of the basic financial goals their parents may have taken for granted. More than eight-in-ten say finding a job is harder for young adults today than it was for their parents’ generation. And at least seven-in-ten say it’s harder now to save for the future (75%), pay for college (71%) or buy a home (69%).

    Tough economic times altering young adults’ daily lives, long-term plans. While negative trends in the labor market have been felt most acutely by the youngest workers, many adults in their late 20s and early 30s have also felt the impact of the weak economy. Among all 18- to 34-year-olds, fully half (49%) say they have taken a job they didn’t want just to pay the bills, with 24% saying they have taken an unpaid job to gain work experience. And more than one-third (35%) say that, as a result of the poor economy, they have gone back to school. Their personal lives have also been affected: 31% have postponed either getting married or having a baby (22% say they have postponed having a baby and 20% have put off getting married). One-in-four (24%) say they have moved back in with their parents after living on their own.

    Adulthood begins later than it used to. In a 1993 Newsweek poll, 80% of parents with young children said children should be financially independent from their parents by the age of 22. Today, only 67% of parents hold that view. Three-in-ten (31%) of today’s parents say children shouldn’t have to be on their own financially until age 25 or later.

    For young adults, bad times don’t trump optimism.
    Among those ages 18 to 34, nearly nine-in-ten (88%) say they either have or earn enough money now or expect they will in the future. Only 9% say they don’t think they will ever have enough to live the life they want. Adults ages 35 and older are much less optimistic—28% say they don’t anticipate making enough money in the future.2 While young people are less likely now than they were before the recession to say they currently have enough income, their level of optimism is undiminished from where it was in 2004.

    Older adults have maintained their standard of living. If any age group has weathered the economic storm better than others, it has been adults ages 65 and older. In a 2004 Pew Research survey, similar shares of young adults (50%), middle-aged adults (52%) and older adults (50%) rated their personal financial situation “excellent” or “good.” By 2011, a large gap had opened up between older adults and everyone else: 54% of older adults gave their personal financial situation a high rating, compared with roughly one-third of younger and middle-aged adults.

    Among the employed, job satisfaction has remained steady… For those young adults who are employed, most are relatively satisfied with their job. Job satisfaction among young workers is roughly the same as it was before the recession and remains somewhat lower than the satisfaction rate among workers ages 35 and older.

    But young workers feel more vulnerable than they used to
    . In a 1998 survey, 65% of 18- to 34-year-olds working full time or part time said they were extremely or very confident that they could find another job if they lost or left their current job.3 The share highly confident fell dramatically to 25% in 2009. It has rebounded somewhat since then (to 43% in the current survey) but is still nowhere near the 1998 level.

    Few young workers see their current job as a “career.” Among all 18- to 34-year-olds, only 30% consider their current job a career. This compares with 52% among workers ages 35 and older. However, the survey suggests that young adults quickly begin to transition from job to career. Among the youngest workers, those ages 18 to 24, only 11% say their job is a career. Among workers ages 25 to 29, the share is three times that (34%). And among those ages 30 to 34, fully half (49%) say they view their job as a career.

    Most young workers say they don’t have the education and training to get ahead. Among 18- to 34-year-olds who are employed, less than half (46%) say they have the education and training necessary to get ahead in their job or career. Among those who are not working, only 27% say they are adequately prepared for the kind of job they want. Having a college degree makes a big difference on this question: 69% of young college graduates who are working say they have the education and training they need to get ahead. This compares with only 39% of those who do not have a degree and are not enrolled in college.

    College enrollment rates are tied to employment declines among the young. A greater share of young adults are enrolled in high school or college today than at any time in recorded history. This increase in enrollment is one reason that fewer young adults are on the job today, but it doesn’t account for all the job losses experienced by this age group in recent years. The Great Recession broadly reduced the employment rate of young adults regardless of whether they were in school. Among those enrolled in school, the employment rate fell from 47.6% in 2007 to 40.7% in 2011. And among those not enrolled in school, it fell from 73.2% to 65.0% over that same period.

    http://www.americanprogress.org/pres...hallenges.html
    You already started a thread with this exact same article.

    News Flash! The economic recovery policies of Barack Obama are simply not working.

    Spam much?

    Plus your link is bad.
    Last edited by Iriemon; Jul 19 2012 at 04:32 PM.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Cessna View Post
    Here is the problem we have in America.

    Our health care system is frequently abused by indigent people and there is nothing we can do about it.

    A crucial statistic

    New Jersey’s Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers founder and family medicine practitioner, Jeffrey Brenner, used medical billing records to find that just 1% of patients accounted for 30% of health care costs in Camden. And that's not all he discovered in the city's three hospitals. He says: "We learned that someone went 113 times in one year. Someone went 324 times in five years. In similar workup in Trenton, they found someone who went 450 times in one year." These were people with complicated medical histories and chronic illnesses. One patient alone racked up $3.5 million in medical bills over a five year period. As Brenner says, :"They're the difficult patients to treat, and no one is being paid and incentivized to pay attention to them."

    What's more, Camden's problem is America's problem. Just 5% of Americans accounted for half of our nation's health care costs in 2009. This is perhaps the crucial statistic to understand about America's health care problem.

    http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn....th-care-issue/
    Here is a great video!

    Obama and His Job Recovery Plan... Where Is It?

    James Cessna

    "If you give a man a fish (socialism), you feed him for a day. It you teach a man to fish (capitalism), you feed him and the people he employs for a lifetime."

  9. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Cessna View Post
    Here is a great video!

    Obama and His Job Recovery Plan... Where Is It?

    Blocked by the Tea Party Republicans.

  10. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Cessna View Post
    Dependency on Government Now Highest in American History.

    It will soon become much worse. In the next 25 years, more than 77 million baby boomers will retire. They will begin collecting checks from Social Security, drawing benefits from Medicare, and relying on Medicaid for long-term care. Who among working Americans will be able to pay the exorbitant taxes required to provide these baby boomers this care?

    Millionaires and billionaires who have taken more and more of the nation's wealth and income thanks in large part to conservative policies.

  11. #10

    Default

    So we want socialism thats the answer to job creation, more people on welfare means more jobs for people who want to work. That is how Europe does it and their societies are much better than the US in terms of crime and poverty rates.
    NOT ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE RACIST, but all racists are conservative.

    UnAmerican not to be for Obama,Government=Solution,Patriotism=Paying Taxes

    Democrats: Freedom For Poor Republicans: Freedom For Rich

Similar Threads

  1. Dependence on Government Highest in History
    By yes/no in forum Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Feb 11 2012, 12:11 AM
  2. Replies: 513
    Last Post: Jan 31 2012, 02:28 AM
  3. Most Prosperous industries dependent on Government
    By CarlB in forum Political Opinions & Beliefs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sep 08 2011, 03:52 PM
  4. What Could Be One of the Biggest Leagl Decisions in American History...
    By NoPartyAffiliation in forum Political Opinions & Beliefs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Aug 16 2011, 12:49 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks