Thread: The Batman movie massacre so obvious it is a false flag to take your guns away

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

The patsy that is accused of doing the Port Arthur massacre to take Australians guns away is still alive but the Zio media call anyone names that questions anything about that.

Conspiracy theory much.

After the Port Arthur massacre, Australians took to the streets to have gun ownership laws changed,, so horrific was the event. The Australian government listened and tightened up gun ownership. Democracy at work.

To add,, the Australian government did not take guns away from the people, it just made gun ownership more difficult to obtain.

His handler let him in and supplied him.

CNN
July 22, 2012

AURORA, CO — A man who was at the Colorado movie theater where a dozen people were killed this morning, says he saw the gunman.

[...]

“As I was sitting down to get my seat, I noticed that a person came up to the front row, the front right, sat down, and as credits were going, it looked like he got a phone call. He went out toward the emergency exit doorway, which I thought was unusual to take a phone call. And it seemed like he probably pried it open, or probably did not let it latch all the way. As soon as the movie started, somebody came in, all black, gas mask, armor, and threw a gas can into the audience, and it went off, and then there were gunshots that took place.”


There had to be two people because theres no way you risk leaving all of your guns outside of an exit unattended for an op like this. Too much risk for someone walking right up to them, and then you're foiled.

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

How the hell does an unemployed (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) afford all this military equipment? the answer is simple, it was supplied! \

From another poster that is logical--

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place.
__

Holmes was clearly provided with exotic gear

"He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."

In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

"Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/loo...cience-phd-stu...).

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_Ja...#ixzz21LyfeNlX

he wasn't unemployed

he was a student but also worked for that college from what I heard

Originally Posted by Ivor

His handler let him in and supplied him.


There had to be two people because theres no way you risk leaving all of your guns outside of an exit unattended for an op like this. Too much risk for someone walking right up to them, and then you're foiled.

Great post Ivor, the fact is in these false flag massacres there always is two or more people doing it. The Port Arthur massacee in Australia (the excuse they used to disarm Australians) there were witnesses silenced and called all the names under the sun by the Zionist owned media that said there was more than one gun man. The Norway massacre is another one that people said there was more than one gunman but the media buried that.

Originally Posted by Ivor

His handler let him in and supplied him.

CNN
July 22, 2012

AURORA, CO — A man who was at the Colorado movie theater where a dozen people were killed this morning, says he saw the gunman.

[...]

“As I was sitting down to get my seat, I noticed that a person came up to the front row, the front right, sat down, and as credits were going, it looked like he got a phone call. He went out toward the emergency exit doorway, which I thought was unusual to take a phone call. And it seemed like he probably pried it open, or probably did not let it latch all the way. As soon as the movie started, somebody came in, all black, gas mask, armor, and threw a gas can into the audience, and it went off, and then there were gunshots that took place.”


There had to be two people because theres no way you risk leaving all of your guns outside of an exit unattended for an op like this. Too much risk for someone walking right up to them, and then you're foiled.

apparently it would not be unusual at all to have a car loaded like that in the USA as it was all perfectly legal

In fact I was hearing on CNN that there are many states in the lunatic US that allow people into restaurants with guns!!!!!

One minister was saying who is opposed to guns in the USA that there are no need now for guns to protect Americans according to their right.

That law was put in place to enable the invaders to kill and Indian opposition and then later to keep the black slaves under control.

Well thats what he said anyway but it doesnt sound surprising at all!

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

How the hell does an unemployed (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) afford all this military equipment? the answer is simple, it was supplied! \

From another poster that is logical--

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place.

What if he bought used? Why couldn't he have purchased any of those weapons/armor at any pawn shop/gun show in the country? And who says he couldn't afford $20 thousand worth of weapons? And how do you jump from roughly $3,600 to $20,000 in the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing first place? Anyways this isn't even close to latest wold news it's bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy conspiratorial tripe, the only question is who you are going to blame in your paranoid delusions, is it the free-masons, the illuminati, or the Jews.

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

How the hell does an unemployed (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) afford all this military equipment? the answer is simple, it was supplied! \

From another poster that is logical--

If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?

A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place.
__

Holmes was clearly provided with exotic gear

"He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."

In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.

"Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/loo...cience-phd-stu...).

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_Ja...#ixzz21LyfeNlX

you mean you think it was like the underwear bomber, not real?

Originally Posted by Abu Sina

apparently it would not be unusual at all to have a car loaded like that in the USA as it was all perfectly legal

In fact I was hearing on CNN that there are many states in the lunatic US that allow people into restaurants with guns!!!!!

One minister was saying who is opposed to guns in the USA that there are no need now for guns to protect Americans according to their right.

That law was put in place to enable the invaders to kill and Indian opposition and then later to keep the black slaves under control.

Well thats what he said anyway but it doesnt sound surprising at all!

many of our business have signs saying no guns beyond this point

I do think every American should be allowed to own rifles and hand guns, but that is it


when someone invents a laser gun that can cut through a line of people like butter would that be an ok gun to have, no, it shoudl be illegal, we need to use common sense, people can own protection.. within limits

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

Why would that be needed when the Zionist own all the media and they just feed the sheep bollocks as news?

lol, yep how did I guess "It's zee JOOOOOOOSSSSS!!!!""" Oh and they apparently control the media too.

Did anyone that did 9/11 need to die? obvioiusly not, as a matter of fact they perps made billions out of it.

Um really don't think that Bin Laden and al-Qaeda (you know the people who actually perpetrated the 9-11 attacks according to those not suffering from acute idiocy) didn't make billions out of it and yes the hijackers did have to die. But congratulations, you managed to blame the Jews for shooting up a movie theater, accuse them of controlling the media, and relieve the Islamic Imperialists of their responsibility for the murder of 3,000 innocent American citizens, 0 to (*)(*)(*)(*)tarted in less than 3 posts!!!

Did anyone that orchestrated the USS Liberty false flag die apart from the victims?.....what's the difference with this?

The U.S.S. Liberty incident was not an example of a false flag it was an example of friendly fire as proven conclusively by the NSA transcripts of Israeli radio communications.

Originally Posted by Mario Milano

Great post Ivor, the fact is in these false flag massacres there always is two or more people doing it. The Port Arthur massacee in Australia (the excuse they used to disarm Australians) there were witnesses silenced and called all the names under the sun by the Zionist owned media that said there was more than one gun man. The Norway massacre is another one that people said there was more than one gunman but the media buried that.

The media in Australia is NOT owned by Zionists ( where did you get this information? Links please).

Guns were not taken away from Australians but Australians demanded tighter gun control after the Port Arthur massacre. The government, after tightening gun control, offered a buy back scheme were gun owners could sell their firearms which were then destroyed. Many many gun owners took up this offer.

And for your information, guns aren't banned in Australia.