Thread: Doesn't make sense to me.

Should Mitt release his tax returns?

Originally Posted by webrockk

If Obama, if so inclined, can access my college transcripts, I have the "right" to reveiw his.

Is that the left's argument?

Is his amnesty fact? Or just a 'reliable source?' I've only heard the latter but would welcome the former with open arms!

Originally Posted by Phoebe Bump

Ha! - there's no question he cheated or he wouldn't have applied for a tax amnesty from the IRS. Getting an amnesty means you are a tax cheat but have weaseled your way out of going before a judge which would have been public record. He hasn't gotten that amnesty for his Cayman accounts. Your boy is an first degree embezzeler regardless of the amnesty.

Originally Posted by AnonymouslyMe

Should Mitt release his tax returns?

I don't care if he does or not...it's his money... and pretending central government authoritarians have some incontrovertible "right" to someone's income (in the first place)

in which to advance class warfare narratives is the epitome of progressive collectivist dogma.

Originally Posted by SFJEFF

But frankly no one who is thinking of voting for Romney cares about his tax records. This is all just very cynical politics in action.

There are dummasses out there that vote Republican just because they think that a RIGHT WINGER, like Obama is a socialist, they may not like a guy like Romney making million$ and paying less taxes than they do, it sure as heck could change the mind of someone if it comes out that this guy is offshoring jobs, money and not paying taxes.

Originally Posted by SFJEFF

Whether it is or is not- it is entirely cynical and political. I am for Obama and against Romney, but I call them as I see them.

ROFLMAO... post of the day right there. You can't make this (*)(*)(*)(*) up.

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

'gives it to them' = posting a copy to the internet.

Hope you don't believe everything you see on the internet!!!

The tax records demand is pure desperation. Nobody cares about his tax returns except loser lefties.

So if Romney does release his income tax, I assume you'll consider what he releases to be FAKE as well?

Originally Posted by NothingSacred

So if Romney does release his income tax, I assume you'll consider what he releases to be FAKE as well?

From mittromney.com

Mitt and Ann Romney have released their complete 2010 tax return and an estimate of their 2011 return. (A full copy of their final 2011 return will be made public as soon as it is filed in the upcoming weeks). The Romneys have provided extensive information about their personal finances, with several hundred pages of tax returns now made public.

Governor Romney’s tax returns show:

First, as a successful businessman, Governor Romney has not only added value to our economy through his investment and business activity, but he has paid millions in taxes every year to the U.S. government.

Second, the Romneys take to heart “to whom much is given, of him shall much be required.” Accordingly, they have been extraordinarily generous in their charitable giving, donating over $7 million from 2010-2011 – donating even more to charity than they paid in taxes.

Third, Mitt Romney has scrupulously complied with the U.S. tax code, and his income is reported and taxed at the applicable rates, and he has paid 100 percent of what he has owed.

As the law does not require the release of any tax returns, the release of these 500+ pages of tax returns goes above and beyond what is required.

In addition, Gov. Romney has released numerous financial disclosures since 2002, as required by law – which have also been posted on this site. There are 3 federal Public Financial Disclosures (from 2007, 2011, and 2012), and 6 Massachusetts Statements of Financial Interests (from 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007).

With a decade's worth of financial disclosure documents and the Romneys' recent tax returns, the American people have an extensive view of the Governor's personal finances, above and beyond what is required by the law.

Nancy Pelosi recently said that there has been too much time spent talking about tax returns instead of the economy. We don’t agree with her on very much, but she’s right about that.

It's time to focus on the real issues in this campaign – turning around the economy and getting America back to work again.

(Tax returns and financial disclosures available @ link)

http://www.mittromney.com/learn/mitt/tax-return/main

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

From mittromney.com



(Tax returns and financial disclosures available @ link)

http://www.mittromney.com/learn/mitt/tax-return/main

But that must be fake, you don't believe what you see on the internet do you? That crap they release on mittromney.com is fake as a $3 bill, Obama's birth certificate and Donald Trump's hair!

Originally Posted by Foolardi

Kindly give an example of " more stupid ".Or less stupid if you prefer.

More stupid is someone who's been presented evidence and ignores it to maintain their position.
Less stupid is folks demanding information in an effort to distract from more important issues.

Originally Posted by Zosiasmom

Both are valid, as long as, once the evidence is presented people (*)(*)(*)(*).

Even once it's presented it meaningless. No one who'v voting one way or another is going to change their mind as a result, and as we've seen with the birthtards, even once evidence has been presented, they ignore it to maintain their stance.

You're not applying for a job cleaning houses. You want to have your finger on the button for the bomb. Character and truth are important--or should be.

They may but, but they'll be ignored by the electorate. With that being said... what's the point?

Originally Posted by Smartmouthwoman

From mittromney.com



(Tax returns and financial disclosures available @ link)

http://www.mittromney.com/learn/mitt/tax-return/main

You mean the ones he made sure were squeaky clean because he was running for President?