They'll always be idiots in the world, and plenty enough for everybody. Plus, people like to argue with one anther on principle, even if they secretly agree.

__________________
The White Fox Uncertainty Principle states that:
You can never know the position of a liberal and the logic behind it at the same time,
because the closer you get to finding one, the more unknown the other one becomes.

I offer you proof that my uncertainty principle stands true:

You brought up a typo again? The best part is I misspelled Semantics, sematics and the spell check did that!! I just accepted the spell check without looking!


ROFLEMAGHEOEK........ Spell Checks!!!

__________________
"He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security"
Benjamin Franklin

R.I.P. Molly, I miss you every day!!


Beatitude # 9- "Blessed are those who spread freedom and democracy, for they shall invade the earth!"

You will be better served refraining from commenting on a philosophical discourse that you know NOTHING about. You are embarrasing yourself. After reading your previous posts I am sure that many on this site will concur with me. I make a point of only conversing with people who have a scintiller of logic and reason in their arguments, so bye bye. You are clearly insane.

Publius summarily accepts your concession, and it is duly noted!!

__________________
"He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security"
Benjamin Franklin

R.I.P. Molly, I miss you every day!!


Beatitude # 9- "Blessed are those who spread freedom and democracy, for they shall invade the earth!"

One questions... What the hell is a scintiller?

Could you be referring to a scintilla?

But if you don't make it back in to clarify, I want you to know that your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted and may I say what a wonderfully open mind you've exhibited and the TOLERANCE of the differing ideas of OTHERS! Faugedaboudit!

-----------------------------------------------------

Frodly, htis si a opyt... Advancing "schematic" for "semantic" is conclusive evidence that the person in question is an ignoramus.

But hey... Let's not argue over schematics...

ROFLMNAO...

Oh God that's precious...