Aw, this is a bit cruel.

Funny Stuff...

__________________
You don't have to pretend to like someone just because you are voting for him.

Congratulations. You're the 5th conservative rehashing something I addressed in the first post. Next I might suggest that you actually read through the posts so we are not repeating ourselves over and over.

__________________
America's Enemies Are Not Mine

All wars represent a failure of diplomacy

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” - Stephen Roberts.

Believe it or not, showing a youtube video proves nothing. The video doesn't even have a name, face or a recognizable organization, yet they pretend to be telling the truth.
Impressive ignorance. However, it is not true. Liberals like to claim to be non-partisan. It is in no way true, they are partisan, but they'll never tell you that.

Here is a video that demonstrates this: Amazing isn't it? She came on there to talk about a children's book, yet she was hammered with questions about politics? I guess that's not too hard to believe considering that we're dealing with a major liberal bias.
I find this video most interesting. I tried my best to come up with a argument using youtube. I could not. It appears that youtube doesn't have any hypnotic omonus voice telling me that I should believe the media is left slanting. Do you find that ironic? I do. How could anyone claim that there is a right slant in media while they're on a medium that is solely left slanting?

This video is interesting. I love how they state the same facts that you do, and that we all seem to agree upon: that most journalists are left slanting. What I find even more lovely is how they simply deny it as not true - just like you. And the real beauty is that - just like you - they don't prove anything. They deny the truth, and tell you not to believe that facts that they agree with. They don't present anything new and fact based. It's like a hug for liberals - like yourself - who go on forums and state false ideas about the media actually being right slanting. Does it make you feel better knowing that there are actually people who believe this too? I hope so. I wouldn't want you to feel all alone - seeing as no one has been on your side in this stupid argument.

Wolf Blitzer is a biased jerk who is only on CNN because his voice sounds like it belongs on the news.

So you concede?

Fair enough... your concession is duly noted and summarily excepted.

Let the record reflect that dismissing the facts is not a refutation of the facts...

There is NO Liberal Media because they are all on Rosie O'Donald's cruise!

__________________
Some

Words From History:

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction...” — Ted Kennedy (September 27, 2002)


"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan.

LOL I love this argument. "I'M NOT LISTENING TO THE FACTS. SHUT UP. WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT IT BECAUSE I KNOW IT'S NOT TRUE." It's so easy to see you're full of it.

No Liberal media?

what about lurch? (Hannity's liberal partner's show)
what about Whoopi Goldberg's show?

the left is none supportive of their own programing ...

the only reason newspapers are still making it is because of the other stuff like coupons that the women like ...
... and the stock reports ...

__________________
Some

Words From History:

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction...” — Ted Kennedy (September 27, 2002)


"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan.

I guess like many others you need your little hand held through this process. In post #1 I said Do you see that. Journalists do not make the decision for the final product. Look at the second video in post #243 at the 4;12 mark. Not one of you is able to recognize the flaw with your argument. Now stop being stupid and learn how to actually debate on the subject at hand.

__________________
America's Enemies Are Not Mine

All wars represent a failure of diplomacy

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” - Stephen Roberts.

Not once except the quote you provided. In other words yes, he referred to him as a liberal. The link also shows his support for unions, a , distributing "wealth and products more equitably," his opposition to conservative democrats (and what is the opposite of conservative?), believed in a large central government, received support from progressives and liberals, faced conservative opposition (again, the opposit of conservative is?), coined the term New Deal Liberalism, helped form the next liberal experiment (Great Society), and a host of other evidence. On the other hand, you have yet to offer even a small crumb or morsel that he was anything but liberal as viewed by historians and others.

He also said and AND AND AND .

Actually we're talking about your error riddled definition of liberal and conservative.

I don't have to, the creators of the organization themselves say they came into extistance in 1987 to fight a liberal media. The end. Unless you can find something proving the owners are lying about their reasons for creating it. I'll wait here while you prove that.

I showed you in every one of them. Your argument is they are lying. Prove it. And if mentioned even one time, that erases your argument.

I was right because it is nearly identical to what he said. Those in the media lean liberal.

The study and this post are two different issues. The public would be right. And all it would show is that in one instance out of a few dozen (which they accounted for and explained) the study was correct.

__________________
All you need to know about the energy crisis:
ANWR Exploration Republicans: 91% Supported. Democrats: 86% Opposed.
Coal-to-liquid R's: 90% YES. D's: 78% NO.
Oil Shale Exploration R's: 90% YES. D's: 86% NO.
Outer Continental Shelf Exploration R's: 81% YES. D's: 83% NO.
Increased Refinery Capacity R's: 97% YES. D's: 96% NO

SUMMARY: 91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of America’s own oil and gas. 86% of House Democrats have historically voted against.