Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 05:56 PM
frodly's Avatar
frodly frodly is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: chicago
Age: 23
Posts: 1,621
usa us illinois
frodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 777
Default Political moderation!

I keep hearing people on the fringes of the political spectrum say that moderates and independents are just confused!

In my humble opinion, it is anyone who is not independent who is confused! In order to be strongly for one party or the other, you have to agree on a whole bunch of unrelated issues! How is some ones view on abortion rights related to their view on Iraq? How is their view on gun control, related to their view on the proper economic course for the country to take?

To me the answer is simple, they have nothing to do with each other. I look at every issue separately based on its merits! Why are so many people willing to believe what a party tells them to believe?
__________________
R.I.P. Molly, I miss you every day!!



Im a Tarte, what! you want some of this?



"Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead." -Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 06:02 PM
rodrigu3 rodrigu3 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,372
usa us new york
rodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud of
Credits: 8,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frodly View Post
Why are so many people willing to believe what a party tells them to believe?
Because people like to fall into groups and put themselves in competition with another group. It makes them feel good about themselves when they win a contest, like the general election.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 06:59 PM
sunnyside sunnyside is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,515
usa
sunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 11,109
Default

Personally I"m a moderate republican. That isn't the same as "don't have opinions on the issues" in my case there are simply issues where I go the other way.

I hold a slightly different opinion of "independents" as they seem to be willing to give up their ability to vote in a number of instances to avoid even slightly applying a label to themselves. I find low knowledge of politics often runs high in the crowd.

However I can see where people who follow the party line come from. The issues are different. But often correlated. (For example someone who strongly supports 2nd amendment rights is likely to be more Hawkish. People who want to ban abortion will often want to ban gay marriage. People who don't want to put the environment before business probably support lower taxes etc).
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 07:05 PM
frodly's Avatar
frodly frodly is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: chicago
Age: 23
Posts: 1,621
usa us illinois
frodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyside View Post
Personally I"m a moderate republican. That isn't the same as "don't have opinions on the issues" in my case there are simply issues where I go the other way.

I hold a slightly different opinion of "independents" as they seem to be willing to give up their ability to vote in a number of instances to avoid even slightly applying a label to themselves. I find low knowledge of politics often runs high in the crowd.

However I can see where people who follow the party line come from. The issues are different. But often correlated. (For example someone who strongly supports 2nd amendment rights is likely to be more Hawkish. People who want to ban abortion will often want to ban gay marriage. People who don't want to put the environment before business probably support lower taxes etc).


I agree some issues are related, but most arent. Just from your examples, how are your views on gun control related to your views on the environment?

Also, I strongly support the second amendment but am in no way hawkish, but I do see your connection their!
__________________
R.I.P. Molly, I miss you every day!!



Im a Tarte, what! you want some of this?



"Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead." -Thomas Paine

Last edited by frodly; 04-10-2008 at 07:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 08:49 PM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,212
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 111,583
Default

IMO, the Republican party is moderate. I am a conservative.
__________________
Order without liberty and liberty without order are equally destructive. - Theodore Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 08:55 PM
MasTequila's Avatar
MasTequila MasTequila is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,439
usa us illinois
MasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant future
Credits: 12,160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frodly View Post
I keep hearing people on the fringes of the political spectrum say that moderates and independents are just confused!

In my humble opinion, it is anyone who is not independent who is confused! In order to be strongly for one party or the other, you have to agree on a whole bunch of unrelated issues! How is some ones view on abortion rights related to their view on Iraq? How is their view on gun control, related to their view on the proper economic course for the country to take?

To me the answer is simple, they have nothing to do with each other. I look at every issue separately based on its merits! Why are so many people willing to believe what a party tells them to believe?
Most conservatives I know believe in black and white, right and wrong and their is no deviation.

My beliefs are simple but I feel I have educated myself.
Abortion is wrong- it kills a baby that is helpless
Iraq - whether you supported it or not, we are in it and must emerge victorious.
Gun Control - The constitution gives Americans the right to bear arms.
Economics - Personal beliefs mostly, but each is responsible for his own life and those he effects (family)

So it may seem simple but for the last several decades conservatives have controlled the Republican party thus I have sided with them. This year it is more difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 09:13 PM
rodrigu3 rodrigu3 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,372
usa us new york
rodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud of
Credits: 8,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MasTequila View Post
Gun Control - The constitution gives Americans the right to bear arms.
The second amendment is often misinterpreted as the right to bear arms. The second amendment clearly states that the right to bear arms falls within the context of it being necessary for a well-regulated militia:
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
There is currently a case being decided in the Supreme Court concerning interpretation of what this context means in modern times, since the last 2nd amendment hearing was held just after the Civil War.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 09:29 PM
MasTequila's Avatar
MasTequila MasTequila is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,439
usa us illinois
MasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant futureMasTequila has a brilliant future
Credits: 12,160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodrigu3 View Post
The second amendment is often misinterpreted as the right to bear arms. The second amendment clearly states that the right to bear arms falls within the context of it being necessary for a well-regulated militia:


There is currently a case being decided in the Supreme Court concerning interpretation of what this context means in modern times, since the last 2nd amendment hearing was held just after the Civil War.
I have a right to bear arms. That right shall not be infringed. I do like the fact that you have strayed from the context of the thread and tried to make this an argument on the 2nd Amendment.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 10:09 PM
sunnyside sunnyside is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,515
usa
sunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 11,109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frodly View Post
I agree some issues are related, but most arent. Just from your examples, how are your views on gun control related to your views on the environment?
Actually I'd say those would tend to be correlated. Specifically both deal with rights (i.e. the right to chop down some trees and the right to carry).

I'm not saying they have to go together. But I'd be willing to wager that there are few in the NRA that are also full on tree-hugging, bust the minks out of their cages, throw acid at the whalers type people.

I think the republican platform is composed mostly the three "chunks"

1. Showing favor for those making more money (not sure exactly where this kicks in, somewhere between $20,000 and certainly by $120,000 household income. Exact point where republican policies favor you varies by indaviduals. I'd guess around $40,000)

2. Support of morals (vaguelly as defined by tradiotion and/or the Catholic church or other religious set).

3. General willingness to take a hard line stance on something. (War, death penalty etc).

I think every republican plank falls into one or more of those catagories. And the three catagories are correlated. The "moral" set tends towards being more hardline. They also tend to actually go and get a job. Often putting them into the republican earning brackets.

(In case your wondering environmentalism policy would fall into the "money" bin)

Democrats I have a harder time defining catagories for. I think I'd go with.

1. Obviously support for those not making enough money.

2. General bleeding heartedness.

3. Morals and values roughly as held by an atheist urban college student on one of the coasts. (This will change over time)

(I think gun control falls under a blend of 2 (the victims) and 3 (how many atheist urban college students on coasts do you know who are packing heat?)

Again these general catgories are also correlated. #2 directly leads to #1 And #3 will have some tendency to produce the others at the time being.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 10:45 PM
frodly's Avatar
frodly frodly is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: chicago
Age: 23
Posts: 1,621
usa us illinois
frodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond reputefrodly has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyside View Post
Actually I'd say those would tend to be correlated. Specifically both deal with rights (i.e. the right to chop down some trees and the right to carry).

I'm not saying they have to go together. But I'd be willing to wager that there are few in the NRA that are also full on tree-hugging, bust the minks out of their cages, throw acid at the whalers type people.

They are not correlated in any way! Chopping down a tree is not a right!! And the second paragraph illustrates my point! I would agree that most NRA members are probably not big environmentalists, but in a lot of ways they should be! They tend to be outdoors-men, and should want to protect the environment!

I don't own a gun, but I do have my license to own a gun(I don't have much money and buying a gun is not high on my list of things to spend on). I strongly support the 2nd amendment rights of all people. But I also believe that people need to be environmentally conscious!
__________________
R.I.P. Molly, I miss you every day!!



Im a Tarte, what! you want some of this?



"Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead." -Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sunday Culture and Political Poetry: Political Worms SeminalBlog Political Blogs 0 02-17-2008 01:30 PM
Marijuana: Use in moderation Neonimbo Drugs, Alcohol & Tobacco 18 10-17-2004 02:17 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden