Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:59 PM
Blade Blade is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,965
Blade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to beholdBlade is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 21,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoe View Post
It seems to me that the same people who are passionate about the right to bear arms on the basis that government can become tyrannical are also the people who are blindly defensive about U.S. foreign policy.
Give me ONE example of such a person, together with supporting evidence - I don't know anyone like that.

Quote:
Those who would furiously defend an individual's property rights and privacy are [apparently] unperturbed when the U.S. military interferes in the privacy and internal affairs of other countries.
On the contrary, it's LIBERALS who are always whining about privacy - you're VERY confused.

Quote:
Moreover, these same people- who do not trust government to do almost anything else- become completely blindly passive and trusting with regard to the President and the Pentagon's military assessments and decisions.
They AGREE with it or they're "blind"? You are making a lot of accusations - who exactly is "blind"??
__________________
Blade: "more educated and literate people than Justabubba"

Justabubba: "that would include everyone"

http://politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=27847

Last edited by Blade; 04-15-2008 at 12:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:15 PM
Zoe's Avatar
Zoe Zoe is offline
Site Moderator
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,054
Zoe has disabled reputation
Credits: 14,909
Default ....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blade View Post
Give me ONE example of such a person, together with supporting evidence - I don't know anyone like that.

"They trust the government to protect them even though the government cannot possibly protect everyone at all times. They also do not take into account that it may someday be the government that we need to protect ourselves from.
Apathy -> socialism -> big government -> oppression."

I have read the above sentiment form various people who are pro-war and seem to trust/believe what they hear from this administration. Like this sort of thing:

"Hogwash. Every word of it. It is lefty blame America rhetoric. Everything from blaming the US for siding with Saddam years ago to debating what constitutes terrorism to spinning what we accomplished by removing Saddam and liberating millions of people.

You really need to come out of the closet and admit you simply dislike America and seek to find fault, or invent fault, to make the US look as bad as possible."


I am not saying these posts came from the same person. I don't have the time to FIND that but I think those two posts are compatible for a lot of people. To me they represent a philosophical disconnect. Distrust government in one arena/trust government in the other.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 06:09 PM
Zoe's Avatar
Zoe Zoe is offline
Site Moderator
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,054
Zoe has disabled reputation
Credits: 14,909
Default ....

Yes, I did insert my subjective adjectives concerning the Iraq war. I probably detracted from the point I was trying to make.

My point is that ( many) war supporters seem to accept the administration's/Pentagon's info uncritically considering the underlying assumption that governments can become tyrannical (and it is therefore imperative to fight for gun ownership). They seem eager to dismiss and demonize critics. Why so trusting of government, so angry with critics. I am looking for insight.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:09 AM
stekim's Avatar
stekim stekim is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,632
vanuatu
stekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud of
Credits: 52,777
Default

Quote:
My point is that ( many) war supporters seem to accept the administration's/Pentagon's info uncritically considering the underlying assumption that governments can become tyrannical (and it is therefore imperative to fight for gun ownership).
You know, that's not my reason for supporting someone's right to own a gun. In all honesty, if our government got more tyrannical I don't think individuals owning guns is going to do much to fix it. They'll just take all the guns one by one. Sure, a few will get killed, but in the end they have more than enough firepower to get the guns. I support gun ownership because I have a right to self defense.
__________________
Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:13 AM
rodrigu3 rodrigu3 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,362
usa us new york
rodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud ofrodrigu3 has much to be proud of
Credits: 8,420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stekim View Post
I support gun ownership because I have a right to self defense.
Thank you! Finally someone gives an honest answer about gun ownership. I am completely in favor of having a gun to put two in the chest and one in the head for any intruder intent on causing damage to property or pain to family.

Last edited by rodrigu3; 04-16-2008 at 06:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 12:15 PM
KidCann117's Avatar
KidCann117 KidCann117 is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 64
usa
KidCann117 is on a distinguished road
Credits: 444
Default

Essentially this is the whole purpose of the Libertarian party.
__________________
This Machine Kills Fascists!

Resistance to Tyranny is Obedience to God

Remember the Children of Sderot
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:02 PM
Zoe's Avatar
Zoe Zoe is offline
Site Moderator
Analyst
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,054
Zoe has disabled reputation
Credits: 14,909
Default ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stekim View Post
You know, that's not my reason for supporting someone's right to own a gun. In all honesty, if our government got more tyrannical I don't think individuals owning guns is going to do much to fix it. They'll just take all the guns one by one. Sure, a few will get killed, but in the end they have more than enough firepower to get the guns. I support gun ownership because I have a right to self defense.
We have guns....target practice. . It is sort of silly to imagine holding off government tanks with a 22. I just don't understand why the gun lobby fights every reasonable restriction on gun ownership

Anyhow, I was appalled as You must have been about the Ruby Ridge incident!.. I see that few people wish to enlighten me on this topic: I wonder why the suspicion concerning that abuse of power does not translate into distrust of the actions of the U.S. military kicking in doors in Iraq and arresting people who don't even communicate in the same language.

I suppose I am Libertarian in this respect: I don't expect individuals or groups to change or behave in a particular way just because I wish it. If my husband has one statement of high praise for me, it is what I am NOT. I am not a nag. People only change glacially and then only because they want to change. I cannot conceive of the level of arrogance required to believe that you can convince a whole nation to behave as you would like them .
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:11 PM
GovernmentCheese GovernmentCheese is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,986
usa us north carolina
GovernmentCheese is a jewel in the roughGovernmentCheese is a jewel in the roughGovernmentCheese is a jewel in the roughGovernmentCheese is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 6,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoe View Post
No, you are assuming that it is a partisan question. Absolutely, Democratic politicians only lately (since Carter) have become less interventionist than Repubs.
That is not the entire truth.

Quote:
However, since I have been posting here, Bush has been Pres. so I can only judge on the basis of the last few years. I am assuming that most of the people who now support the Iraq misadventure would also have supported the Vietnam misadventure under Johnson.
You can assume that because you are 80 years old?

Quote:
The flip side to the question which I ask MYSELF! is this: Why I still believe that government is capable of doing some domestic things efficiently and honestly when I totally disparage its right and ability to nation build, elsewhere.
Ask why LBJ's programs have failed so miserably. It is not because inner-city people or rural rednecks are stupid. To the contrary.
__________________
And he said unto them, Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself: whatsoever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in thy country.

And he said, Verily I say unto you, No prophet is accepted in his own country.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:00 AM
stekim's Avatar
stekim stekim is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,632
vanuatu
stekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud ofstekim has much to be proud of
Credits: 52,777
Default

Quote:
We have guns....target practice. . It is sort of silly to imagine holding off government tanks with a 22. I just don't understand why the gun lobby fights every reasonable restriction on gun ownership.
I think the "tyrannical government" argument made a lot of sense when the Republic was new and people actually cared about that (I don't think they do now). Further, all the government had was militias with guns and cannons and a few war ships, so an armed populace could actually fight back. In 2008 the argument doesn't really fly. If they want the guns, they will get the guns.

Quote:
Anyhow, I was appalled as You must have been about the Ruby Ridge incident!.. I see that few people wish to enlighten me on this topic: I wonder why the suspicion concerning that abuse of power does not translate into distrust of the actions of the U.S. military kicking in doors in Iraq and arresting people who don't even communicate in the same language.
Because the Iraqi's want to kill you. They got the boogieman tag. The folks at Ruby Ridge didn't get the boogieman tag. Whether you are actually the boogieman or not doesn't matter.

Quote:
I suppose I am Libertarian in this respect: I don't expect individuals or groups to change or behave in a particular way just because I wish it. If my husband has one statement of high praise for me, it is what I am NOT. I am not a nag. People only change glacially and then only because they want to change. I cannot conceive of the level of arrogance required to believe that you can convince a whole nation to behave as you would like them.
That's why I am not a fan of social conservatives. One small recent example (albiet minor) was a law they wanted to pass here making Sunday alcohol sales legal in stores. You can buy it in restaurants, but you can't buy it in stores (which just leads to more drinking and driving on Sundays, but whatever). Two thirds of the people are for it and the majority of legislators are for it, but not enough to override a veto. The RR is big down here and they say Sunday sales should continue to be banned "to keep the sabbath holy". The problem is, it's not my sabbath! Why in the world do I need to keep YOUR sabbath holy? If you want to do that, then don't drink on Sunday. What do I care? But I'm not sure why it has to involve me. I'm cool with your religious beliefs, but I don't see any need to live the rules of a faith I don't even follow. And the funny thing is, they would be PISSED if Hindus took over and banned beef. Not that hypocrisy is anything new.
__________________
Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

Last edited by stekim; 04-17-2008 at 05:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 05:12 AM
CrusaderRabbit08's Avatar
CrusaderRabbit08 CrusaderRabbit08 is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,524
CrusaderRabbit08 has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebellion View Post
Internal affairs? Examples please.
Iran is an excellent example. In 1953, we overthrew their government and installed a dictator. He then brutally tortured and murdered his own people with our help for the next quarter century.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does anyone understand Texas? Raeka Elections & Campaigns 10 03-30-2008 04:57 PM
Help me understand this Registered-Guest Warfare / Military 0 06-20-2007 11:43 AM
The Stuff We Don't Understand JavaBlack Religion 7 04-16-2007 07:34 AM
Do We Really Understand? JP5 Off-Topic Chat 53 03-21-2005 12:00 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden