Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181 (permalink)  
Old 04-25-2008, 07:47 PM
sunnyside sunnyside is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,515
usa
sunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to beholdsunnyside is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 11,109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raharu Haruha View Post
Before I start, I'd like to give some constructive criticism. You're a scatter brain. Your post covers 4 topics and then gives a pep talk at the end. I hope that's not my fault, I could have sworn this topic was simpler than all that.
I'm afraid simple it isn't. Well, you could make it simple, send all the poor people to gulags or something, but within the context of our country as is it isn't simple.

On lowering the dollar. Obviously it isn't a panacea. We can't sell cars for a dollar in other countries and come out well for it. Would a 10% shift help? Maybe. I won't claim to know for sure.

But what I meant by a race to the bottom with China is that without various forms of protectionism in place. If someone in China is willing to do the work for almost nothing they're going to keep getting that work.

Things either have to get better there, or we have to have different sorts of jobs here. Hopefully the former will eventually happen, but for now I think we should focus on the latter.

Quote:
And if you're assuming that taking away welfare will create the poverty that china has, then you're forgetting that china is communist.
Which, ironically, means they should have poverty. Ah communism. No I don't think taking away welfare here would do that. I would just expect things to be crappier for a subset of the population, and probably some increased crime and civil unrest.

Note that while I don't know this for a fact. I would suspect that a number of the people who are in poverty are still net contributers to the country. i.e. if a family of four has a father working 60 hours a week to make 20,000 a year they're still under the poverty line and would get support. But I believe they're still paying a range of taxes, and certainly sales tax. Quite possibly for a net gain for the country.

Quote:
{on Ethanol going out of style}
it already has. There've been riots in third world countries because they cannot afford food.
On the subject of Ethanol ceasing to make it would reduce the poverty rate. Because the poverty figure is based off of the price of food, and if all that corn that is going into Ethanol were instead used for an edible crop food would be cheaper.

That said, again, I think the reason why Ethanol is so popular at the moment is to reduce the amount of oil we import. And oil is also rising in cost. Additionally we aren't on any friendlier terms with Iran.

So while they might shut Ethanol production down, I wouldn't bet on it.

Quote:
Well, I consider this off topic, but ok. Here's the thing, assuming that people could actually get those jobs - which has never happened - then yes we could all be earning more. It would be an extraordinary thing, but it's highly unlikely.
I don't have numbers, but I'm pretty confident the percentage of Americans in skilled jobs has risen significantly since we founded the country. Certainly the number of people with college degrees has gone up. So through having other countries do the manual labor or through machinery and automation we have been bringing/creating better jobs in America.

Quote:
Simply raising the minimum wage could actually increase poverty. As the pay goes up, businesses have to fire some people. If the government artificially raises wages then you miss the equilibrium of supply and demand in the job market, and then some people cannot get jobs - which actually makes the poor poorer over all. So it's another ultimatum.
True enough that it could. And hence it should be done thoughtlessly. However, particularily if the average employee is being paid less than their marginal value.

It's a rather intensive field of study I'm given to understand. However supposedly it doesn't have the impact some people like to claim. For more info you can read
http://213.253.134.43/oecd/pdfs/browseit/8106071E.PDF
if you have the time.

However the basic supply demand curve model seems obviously wrong to model this. We are at the bottom of the rung of jobs and we are in a system with a finite number of people. The basic supply curve model assumes that workers or their labor vanish and materialize at different price points. However in a system with a finite number of workers, who all want to work but can't shift to a different level of jobs(at least not directly) that model doesn't seem to hold at all.

It would seem to presume that if you pay someone $25 and hour they will work 80 hour weeks, but if you pay them $2.50 an hour they will only want to work, say, 10 hour weeks. That doesn't seem to be the case at all.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #182 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 04:03 AM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
I surrender!!!!
It's about time.

But really, all I did was ask a question. There was no reason to insult me.
Reply With Quote
  #183 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 09:02 AM
B L Zeebubs Mum's Avatar
B L Zeebubs Mum B L Zeebubs Mum is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: wales
Age: 92
Posts: 60
uk uk wales
B L Zeebubs Mum is a jewel in the roughB L Zeebubs Mum is a jewel in the roughB L Zeebubs Mum is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBob View Post
It's about time.

But really, all I did was ask a question. There was no reason to insult me.
There, there Mr Bob its all in the rough and tumble of growing up.
Reply With Quote
  #184 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 07:38 AM
BuckNaked BuckNaked is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,774
usa us texas
BuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 22,435
Default

Quote:
I'll give you a second chance....
That’s awful white of ya! I swear the arrogance level of some people on this board is of epic proportions.

If you don’t agree with something I have written, feel free to state otherwise! In the mean time you, "give" me nothing, since you have so little to offer!?

But just for the sake of amusement, let "us" try again.

Levels of poverty are metered differently in each and every society, the same can be said about wealth. It is the society in which you live that determines if you are indeed living in poverty, or simply just a poor working class stiff, or if you have obtained, or have the ability/leverage to obtain measurable wealth.

Poverty- Lack of the means of providing material needs or comforts. (IOW needs help)

Poor- Having little or no wealth and few or no possessions.

Rich- Possessing great material wealth, having great worth or value.

Since wealth = power, and value = leverage, those without measurable wealth and/or value, have no attainable wealth or value! So if you have little wealth you are poor, and if you have no way of obtaining basic needs you are at the poverty level.

Where do you disagree?
__________________
There are only two things wrong with this great nation of ours, democrats and republicans!

Not necessarily in that order.
Reply With Quote
  #185 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 08:58 AM
Raharu Haruha's Avatar
Raharu Haruha Raharu Haruha is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,708
Raharu Haruha is a glorious beacon of lightRaharu Haruha is a glorious beacon of lightRaharu Haruha is a glorious beacon of lightRaharu Haruha is a glorious beacon of lightRaharu Haruha is a glorious beacon of lightRaharu Haruha is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 10,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckNaked View Post


That’s awful white of ya! I swear the arrogance level of some people on this board is of epic proportions.

If you don’t agree with something I have written, feel free to state otherwise! In the mean time you, "give" me nothing, since you have so little to offer!?

But just for the sake of amusement, let "us" try again.

Levels of poverty are metered differently in each and every society, the same can be said about wealth. It is the society in which you live that determines if you are indeed living in poverty, or simply just a poor working class stiff, or if you have obtained, or have the ability/leverage to obtain measurable wealth.

Poverty- Lack of the means of providing material needs or comforts. (IOW needs help)

Poor- Having little or no wealth and few or no possessions.

Rich- Possessing great material wealth, having great worth or value.

Since wealth = power, and value = leverage, those without measurable wealth and/or value, have no attainable wealth or value! So if you have little wealth you are poor, and if you have no way of obtaining basic needs you are at the poverty level.

Where do you disagree?
Stating the obvious doesn't make you look smart...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by catawba View Post
I never claimed that 100,000 civilians died by American hands. I merely state the fact that our invasion and occupation has resulted in 100,000 civilian deaths.

This is figure approximates the numbers from Iraq Body Count, the most well documented, and highly regarded, source of civilian Iraq deaths from violence during our war with Iraq.
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
So your logic is that if we are not there, the number will go down... That makes perfect sense... not.
Reply With Quote
  #186 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:41 AM
BuckNaked BuckNaked is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,774
usa us texas
BuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to beholdBuckNaked is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 22,435
Default

Quote:
Stating the obvious doesn't make you look smart...
When dealing with some you gotta kick it down a knotch or two! Simplistically speaking that is?

I guess I could have said, there are only two types of people, those who want more than they have, and those who want control of what you have too!
__________________
There are only two things wrong with this great nation of ours, democrats and republicans!

Not necessarily in that order.

Last edited by BuckNaked; 04-28-2008 at 09:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there any true poverty in the U.S.? Truth-Bringer Political Opinions & Beliefs 42 01-31-2007 05:54 AM
Poverty Survey Bastion Human Rights 8 12-01-2006 06:40 PM
Poverty and the Elderly ForceoftheTruth Political Opinions & Beliefs 7 03-17-2006 07:03 AM
Poverty on the rise in the U.S.!! BuckNaked Current Events 65 09-06-2005 03:21 PM
Poverty JOEBIALEK Social Security 2 07-22-2004 09:06 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden