And why should be believe a thing that the left wing extremist Palast has to say anyway? His factless "believe what I say" articles are typical of his "writings."

__________________
JMS gets another English lesson:

Quote:

there is no "mostly unique;" thats like saying "sometimes always," its an oxymoron - its either one or the other.

The result:

Quote:

By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.

If Traitors to our country and political system tried to do this in the colonial days they would be tared and feathered. Rush and the like deserve nothing less.

So what you're saying is that American's should NOT have the right to vote for whomever they wish, for whatever reason.

I suppose now you'll want Thought Police to make sure we are all thinking the same way you do as well?

__________________
http://www.nosocialism.com
-----------------------------------------------
America is not a Socialist country, this is why the only democrats who ever win, are democrats who SOUND like Republicans (Hello Bill Clinton - Low taxes, Free Trade, Welfare Reform, Era of Big Government Over - Sounds Republican).

Whoa, don't confuse who 'they' are- The county didn't use the list yes, but the Miami Herald did to come up with that conclusion. Like I said, "apparent", as according to the list. I'm not sure where that article is, I found it once- they ran that side of the story one day, and the other side the next. It is the only article mentioned to support this issue, nevermind its messed up numbers (between the two days even, they mixed up the numbers, if memory serves)

Next page of that palast qrticle btw, these are some preliminary numbers. Like I said this is an early report, the numbers would later shoot up-

" An additional 279 were not close matches with names on the county's own voter rolls and were not notified. Of the 3,258 names on the original list, therefore, the county concluded that more than 15 percent were in error. If that ratio held statewide, no fewer than 7,000 voters were incorrectly targeted for removal from voting rosters."

Anyway can we talk about Chaos instead, that was your initial point? Don't you think its immoral and an affront to your Democratic system?

I followed this stuff very closely, and I have absolutely no idea how the heck you came up with those numbers, because I don't remember anything like that. It just blows my mind that there are so many people out there wanting Ex-Cons to have made the difference between which president won. I think it's indicative of the Democrats, "Hey let's have all the Criminals Votes count, and let's legalize all the illegals here, you know they'll vote Democrat!!!"

__________________
http://www.nosocialism.com
-----------------------------------------------
America is not a Socialist country, this is why the only democrats who ever win, are democrats who SOUND like Republicans (Hello Bill Clinton - Low taxes, Free Trade, Welfare Reform, Era of Big Government Over - Sounds Republican).

You can't be serious.

As I state in my post, those numbers are from that article. I sincerly doubt you've followed this closely- notably you just got that wrong.

I want those that have the legal right to vote be counted.

Don't straw-man and turn this around. A law was broken by Republicans for Republicans, and they did that purely for votes. This is not about whether ex-cons should be able to vote, this is about your average voter getting wiped off voter rolls, with a heavy focus on minorities and therefore Democrats, to ensure a Bush win. If you were familiar with Palast's work you'd know that.

I suppose this ties in nicely with Operation Chaos though and your support of that. Anything to win right? I still want to know if see anything morally wrong about that.