Originally Posted by justabubba

if we were discussing a family's budget and recognized that its spending obligations exceeded its present income, and that its line of credit was maxxed out, to propose reducing the annual income as the solution to that financial problem would be found imprudent. so, why does the right wing think reducing our national income, by making a tax reduction permanent, is an appropriate solution when our country's fiscal crisis is like the budget issue described above?

Originally Posted by justabubba

if we were discussing a family's budget and recognized that its spending obligations exceeded its present income, and that its line of credit was maxxed out, to propose reducing the annual income as the solution to that financial problem would be found imprudent. so, why does the right wing think reducing our national income, by making a tax reduction permanent, is an appropriate solution when our country's fiscal crisis is like the budget issue described above?

Originally Posted by catzmeow

Gosh, Crest, that's exactly how I feel every time I open one of your threads.

Originally Posted by crestwood33

People can't afford to drive or eat. The Bush Legacy

Originally Posted by Publius Infinitum

What the hell are you talking about? That is absolute nonsense... Why don't you post some valid evidence in support of this drivel?

Originally Posted by Rino

Is posting nothing of substance, never backing up claims and trolling the board normal for Crest?

Originally Posted by crestwood33

don't follow the lemmings follow the leaders.