Originally Posted by Anikdote

The sad part is though, there is nothing on the inside. An opinion based on no factual information is always going to be a hard one to support.

Originally Posted by Publius Infinitum

Friends, this person is incapable of reason.

It's as simple as that. She has yet to advance a valid argument, she can't cite a single valid statute which supports her assertion of a violation; she has repeatedly stated that without regard to the evidence and reason which refutes her position she will simply continue to charge otherwise and the site simply refuses to enforce its own rules regarding trolling...

But this is a fine exercise in testing the reason of the ideological left and their anti-American perspective; a perspective which is just as vacuous as this members specious argument... they're simply dogmatic defenders of a failing ideology desperate to ignore their own failure and desperation of such a level that they are now promoting an enemy that were they to actually get their way and see that enemy succeed in its goal of a world-wide caliphate…, the first people that enemy would kill, would be them...

Let the record reflect that this member advances an argument which declares the United Nations as the final world authority, with its charter representing the scope of international law.

The UN Charter is not international law, on any level and is not binding against even member states, let alone non-member states.

This member declares that the US Constitution lays out specific language which requires Congress to declare war in specific terms; yet the member cannot cite a single article within the USC in support of that position.

The Member refuses to post supporting argument, rejects refuting evidence and continues to advance a thoroughly failed position.

He is advancing the equivalent of: 2+2=7 and despite all of the evidence to the contrary, with analogical descriptions illustrating the certain value of four being the sum of 2 & 2... The advocate simply rationalizes that there are many people who believe 2+2=7 so he's entitled to say so...

Originally Posted by C-D-P

What? Ever since I came to this board you have complained that his decision to go into Iraq was illegal because it violated the constitution. Now you are saying that it does not?

Boy you have a lot of correcting to do then.

Originally Posted by Anikdote

The sad part is though, there is nothing on the inside. An opinion based on no factual information is always going to be a hard one to support.

Originally Posted by BigRed

You were talking about something completely different.

It goes against the Constitution. I have no clue what you were talking about with regards to the 9th and 10th amendment.

Originally Posted by C-D-P

Now you are going to claim ignorance? Ok then.

Plenty of facts have been presented. You fail to accept them because they go against your opinion. That is fine, and was expected.

Originally Posted by BigRed

You have not presented facts CDP.

I have followed this thread obviously. You have only presented an opinion document. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Originally Posted by Publius Infinitum

He is advancing the equivalent of: 2+2=7 and despite all of the evidence to the contrary, with analogical descriptions illustrating the certain value of four being the sum of 2 & 2... The advocate simply rationalizes that there are many people who believe 2+2=7 so he's entitled to say so...

Originally Posted by BigRed

You have not presented facts CDP.

I have followed this thread obviously. You have only presented an opinion document. Nothing more. Nothing less.