I haven't heard her expound this view. Could you provide a source for this?

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=1056

Refusing to touch men because of her religion? Supporting the Islamist viewpoint? Wanting to criminalize free speech?

Yes, she refuses to shake hands with men. And she thinks Denmark should leave Iraq. She is hardly alone in this viewpoint among Danes.

Other than those two points, I don't see what you mean?

If you cannot understand why her working with radical right wing Islamist groups has any bearing on this, then I doubt we can ever really communicate here.


I mean, since Minhaj-ul-Q'ran is SO progressive and all .

Lackluster, I'm on your side. I wouldn't vote for her if she was the only electable person left in the country.

But you must remember that when you make claims, you must be able to support those claims. And you were not able to do so.

Hence, just be careful about the claims you make.

But her working with Minhaj-ul-quran DOES support my claim.

In what sense? She already explained that bit.

If you wish to say she is in favor of A or B or C, you better have concrete evidence that she does.

Only if one believes her excuse.



She worked in favor of criminilzing free speech pertaining to dissing (don't know if that is just an Americanism or not) Islam. I consider that concrete evidence considering the way Islamist totalitarianism is expressed through the suppression of anything critical of this political ideology.

Doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. The point is that you don't have evidence that she said anything incriminating.
Why do you think she worked to criminalize free speech pertaining to dissing Islam? Where is your evidence?

On october 29, 2005, acting as coordinator for various Islamist groups, she filed a complaint with police against jyllands posten.