He wants to appease our enemys like Chamberlain did. Well a vote for Obama is a vote for weakness.

http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar...hamberlain.jpg



Chamberlain 1st meeting with hitler
2nd
result

Obama’s take


One thing: Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2 have never talked with the Iranian leaders face to face since after the Sha and I can’t think of any president who has ever met North Koreas leaders face to face.

__________________
Support Your Local Oil and Gas Companies and the Industry. Invest in Oil & Gas Futures.

Take your Kids Hunting and Fishing.

Yes, I've heard of this comparison before. Difference is, Chamberlain wanted to appease Nazis, Barack Hussein Obama wants to appease Muslims and give hundred of billions of American tax-payer dollars to Third World African countries.

There are reasons for the HAMAS endorsement, they didn't just come out for Barack Hussein Obama so he wouldn't cry again.

I love this cartoon.

__________________
.

"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.

--Murray Rothbard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny. A liberal is just a libertarian who hasn't studied economics.

Obama is a socialist and he is far more than a Nevilla Chamberlain. He is a full blown anti-American. The result of an administration goverened by him will make the 9-11 result fo the Clinton administration look like a walk in the park.

The bad news is all three possibles are equally as offensive. We have much pain to endure in the future. The popularism he is riding on will very likely see the going the way of the Nazis. When socialist get power people die and a lot of them, so get ready.

I bet we can get Obama out on perjury in the first few weeks, he just lies continually. It's just too bad that anti-Americanism is not a crime for a president, or he'd be gone sooner.

__________________
.

"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.

--Murray Rothbard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny. A liberal is just a libertarian who hasn't studied economics.

Right, let's look at Iran Geopolitically, here is a good map:



You see the only country Iran could attack is technically, us.

They can say and do all they want but the fact remains that we completely surround them and the only areas they could expand into is us. No chance, popular to contemporary thought the Iranian government does not want to be toppled by the Americans, does any?

True, they have the initiative but they don't want to attack anyone because the last time a nation that wasn't in the 'club' so to speak started building an empire WW1 and 2 happened. What makes you think that all the powerful countries won't team up to destroy this challenge to their rule? The UN is just all the powerful countries of the world together and if such an overt threat is made ( a caliphate being established that would take over the whole Middle East and become a new superpower) to their rule they will stop it (like Britain, France, China, Russia and America did last time). Truman's phrase 'Containment' comes to mind....

History is politics 50 years ago and politics of the present will be history in 50 years

__________________
I'll tell you this no eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn
You may bury my body, down by the highway side,
so my old evil spirit can get a Greyhound bus and ride.
You and I must fight to survive

this fellow knows as much about appeasment as our OP:

__________________

Quote:

"I like to watch the news, because I don't like people very much and when you watch the news ... if you ever had an idea that people were really terrible, you could watch the news and know that you're right."

Frank Zappa

lol, theyre really cracking down on know nothings arent they?

__________________
https://www.voteforchange.com/

Neville Chamberlain was a great statesman who cared enough for the British masses to try to avoid their demise. Besides, if England had denounced its committment to capitalism and individual liberty, Nazi socialists would have never needed to oppose them.

Nazi Germany put Socialism a bit ahead of its time, but Socialism is the way of our present and our future. Why are there still some of you who can't see the obvious? Private ownership of property and freedom of choice are obstacles to our growth as a Progressive state. Only a strong centralized power can adequately disperse wealth and benefits to achieve uniformity and equality for the masses.

If there are some casualties along the way, that'll just have to be the price paid for the maturity and completion of our Progressive society. Barak Obama has the leadership qualities we need to complete the inevitable change from capitalism and personal choice that Chamberlain tried to affect for England. Vote Democratic this November.

KOD, hes not going to establish a dictatorship. No-one is. I mean like ever, unless China rolls all guns blazing some time from now.

And do you think you're helping your cause by what, championing Nazi Germany?