![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: PLEASE READ FIRST POST BEFORE YOU VOTE | |||
| Huey Long |
|
9 | 31.03% |
| Franklin D. Roosevelt |
|
5 | 17.24% |
| George W. Bush |
|
10 | 34.48% |
| Woodrow Wilson |
|
2 | 6.90% |
| William Jennings Bryan |
|
2 | 6.90% |
| Ronald Reagan |
|
3 | 10.34% |
| Other (explain) |
|
6 | 20.69% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Oh BTW. I love Rumi poems. |
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Funny to me how not one of the neo-cons on this board has NO rebuttal to my post. Completely true in regards to my accusations of this Fascist PIG, G.W., don't ya think? Why is it no one wants to debate it? Would be an excellent topic if U ask me. But then, , , I'm not a 'Neo'.
PROB Last edited by whatsyurprob; 05-26-2008 at 01:52 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Nice copy and paste job. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Ill have a shot!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Collective? I'm sure thats easy when your not surrounded by a bunch of (*)(*)(*)(*)ing retards!!! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
It turns out that there is no Dr. Lawrence Britt listed anywhere; he's not employed at any University and his study has no academic origin. The 'study' is just another attempt by the radical left to re-paint fascism to be something it's not. Fascism is not an enigma; it's very readily defined, as is the case with everything that comes out of the ideological left it is simple. The confusion is simply a function of the ideological left’s projection of the label onto anything which contests or contested socialism. This goes all the way back to Stalin who declared everyone from FDR to Trotsky to be a fascist. Naturally, the western media sycophants ran to embrace this sleight of hand and given that the western media was thought by the public to be a credible source, the meaning of fascism came to be blurred, where even the vaunted pointy heads of academia grew up believing the various fallacious media driven understandings of fascism. Fascism differs from socialism in one and only one way and that it that it focuses socialism on one nation state; this instead of setting aside the culture or pride founded in the cultural roots, where otherwise socialism seeks to rinse such loyalties from whatever culture it comes to infect; this in order that the culture’s only loyalty is to socialism itself; where the mythical notion of 'the people' is set above all else. It's this myth which requires all political opposition to be squelched as such opposition is said to be counter to ‘the will of the people.' There are no better examples of fascism in modern times than the three presidential candidates presently seeking the power of the US Executive. Each one demands higher taxation, substantial increases in government power to regulate business; the two Democrat candidates being the worst of the three, both proclaiming that the profits of industry should be nationalized, so that those profits can be used to better 'the people' for any number of absurd reasons. Fascism is merely socialism attached to and operating within the accepted sovereignty of the state. It is in every respect “SOCIALISM.” |
|
||||
|
It appears that there is some doubt on the Fascist nature of FDR. Here is an account of the period:
The nation was caught up in a war fever, fomented by the government, even though there was no war. Striking union members were provoked into a riot by government forces. Sixty-seven workers were killed, some shot in the back. A young correspondent reported, "I understood deep in my bones and blood what fascism was." A leading intellectual who'd signed on with the government declared in a lecture to the students, "The ordeal of war brings out the magnificent resources of youth." - The British ambassador cabled London to alert his superiors to the spreading hysteria fomented by the nation's new leader. The "starved loyalties and repressed hero-worship of the country have found in him an outlet and a symbol." Visiting the rural hinterlands, an aide reported back on the brewing cult of personality: "Every house I visited --mill worker or unemployed --had a picture of the President . . . He is at once God and their intimate friend; he knows them all by name, knows their little town and mill, their little lives and problems. And though everything else fails, he is there, and will not let them down." - Though the crisis was economic in nature, the new national commander had promised to seek the "power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe . . .I assume unhesitatingly the leadership of this great army of our people dedicated to a disciplined attack upon our common problems. (pg. 121-122, from Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism)
__________________
. "It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance. --Murray Rothbard Join the Libertarians!
Last edited by White Fox; 05-26-2008 at 07:44 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now please be as specific as you're able; as I've seen this baseless assertion trotted out many times and thus far not a single valid example has been forthcoming. Just to head ya off… The Patriot Act is a piece of legislation which was advanced by both houses of Congress, with major (nearly unanimous) bi-partisan support, for the specific purposes of combating a domestic insurgency of radical Islamic leftists, which are known to be at war, plotting the mass murder of innocent people. Now the nearly unanimous vote of a bi-partisan congressional vote, to prevent an enemy insurgency intent on using our own government protections to assist them in the mass murder as many innocent people as possible, does not equate to an autonomous Presidential Decree… beyond that it is insanity to not set aside government protections, during a time of war, that would otherwise protect the very enemy walking within the citizenry, even as they plot to murder as many of that innocent citizenry, as possible. Now you may not believe that such an insurgency exists… which of course will lead us to you being challenged to lay out your evidence, which must show that those who disagree with you, are incorrect in their heavily supported opinions that such an insurgency does exist. Best of luck to ya... Last edited by Publius Infinitum; 05-26-2008 at 07:51 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||