They were voting for other referendums and not just the democratic nominee.

But he can't either.

__________________
Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies
but not terrorists.

I agree that it is stupid not to count the votes. No argument here, except they ALL (Obama and Clinton and DNC) agreed on it. Obama wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan. I just don't understand the problem here. If they all agreed to the rules (fair or not for the voters), you can't change it half way through a contest. You can't cry at this point and say that every vote should count when 6 months ago you agreed to ignore those same votes. Wow, she is really being a hypocrite and sore loser.

Who gives a (*)(*)(*)(*) if she can win? Her politics are just as screwed up as his politics are. The point is, she has enough votes to prevent him from getting the nomination on the first round. That means a deal can be cut.

Imagine how ugly it can get if they go back and forth and the Dems go with a dark horse instead? It's not unheard of and it's happened before.

He will have more pledged delegates! That is the whole point. It should not be up to the superdelegates. Even so, they will not overturn the pledged delegates. So she's just trying to manipulate the system. If the roles were reversed, do you really think she'd be fighting to count Florida and Michigan?

But even with his pledged delegate he doesn't win the nomination because he doesn't meet the democrat criteria to declare a winner. For either to win they need the supers. So therefore they should both stay in or drop out based on your reasoning.

__________________
Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies
but not terrorists.

I don't care if they agreed on it; the problem is, they used tax money to fund a private selection process. Do you get it? Tax money was used. Therefore, it's up to the voters (ie, taxpayers) to set the dates, not the political parties; and the voters decided to hold the primaries early. If the DNC doesn't like it, then they can pay for it next time.

Can he win? No, then he should drop out.

And Crusader is absolutely right here. The taxpayers are the overlooked here. They are the government, not the party and definately not the candidate. This is the problem with the political systems in America, they feel they are what is important. They have forgotten the American people. This is why I have recently abandoned the Republicans.

__________________
Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies
but not terrorists.

I AGREE TOTALLY, but that argument should have been made last August when the DNC announced it. Besides, like I said before, they were still going to vote because they are voting on other local issues. Not just for the candidate.