Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 05:44 PM
Leo Leo is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
usa
Leo is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Leo
Icon17 Mandatory Healthcare

What if there was a health care system that had primary coverage,funded by the government that was mandatory?(THe coverage was basic doc appointments and minor surgeries, etc) Then a secondary coverage plan covered everything else but was optional.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:02 PM
ABoyNamedSue's Avatar
ABoyNamedSue ABoyNamedSue is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In Republic of the United States of America
Age: 38
Posts: 4,161
fiji de saxony
ABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
What if there was a health care system that had primary coverage,funded by the government that was mandatory?(THe coverage was basic doc appointments and minor surgeries, etc) Then a secondary coverage plan covered everything else but was optional.
We would not be living in a "free" society. We would be kept under the thumb of the Imperial Government. Sure, the neo-socialists and dregs of society don't mind, but I would like to continue being self-sufficient, thankyouverymuch.
__________________
"I should be calling collect from jail for the things I commit each night in my head" - D. Mustaine.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:09 PM
Danik Danik is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 491
usa us maryland
Danik is just really niceDanik is just really niceDanik is just really niceDanik is just really niceDanik is just really nice
Credits: 4,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
What if there was a health care system that had primary coverage,funded by the government that was mandatory?(THe coverage was basic doc appointments and minor surgeries, etc) Then a secondary coverage plan covered everything else but was optional.
That could easily be accomplished by what McCain is pushing through opening competition among insurance companies throughout the nation, as well as the allowance of optional plans given ones needs. The problem with it is that the liberals would cry about the fact that the elderly have to pay more for their health care costs because they are far more likely to develop illness, disease, and medical costs through emergencies. Perhaps they didn't read the book, "Everyone dies." when they were a kid.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:17 PM
G_Haile12 G_Haile12 is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 391
G_Haile12 has a spectacular aura aboutG_Haile12 has a spectacular aura aboutG_Haile12 has a spectacular aura about
Credits: 1,339
Default

Umm, lol, what exactly is the 'choice' is health care, I mean you've seen one hospital you've seen them all. I mean at these 'other' hospitals do you get different versions of antibiotics or something? There simply is no choice in health because the standards for medicine and care are national and uniform, so there's no room for difference. I mean there's not multiple ways to treat an infection is there? Medical science makes it's pretty clear what works and what doesn't.

'Choice' in health care is a right-wing sham.
__________________
“The goal of an Obama Presidency is to make sure we have bottom-up economic growth instead of just the old, tired, worn-out trickle-down ideologies that we have been seeing for so many years.”
Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:35 PM
DanteAugustusGermanicus's Avatar
DanteAugustusGermanicus DanteAugustusGermanicus is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,257
usa us massachusetts
DanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really nice
Credits: 4,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
What if there was a health care system that had primary coverage,funded by the government that was mandatory?(THe coverage was basic doc appointments and minor surgeries, etc) Then a secondary coverage plan covered everything else but was optional.
what if we looked at what 5 Capitalist Democracies have done before we attempt to reinvent the wheel?



5 Capitalist Democracies and How They Do It.
__________________
_________________

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know them by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against them.
-Jonathan Swift

---"Thoughts On Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting."
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:42 PM
White Fox's Avatar
White Fox White Fox is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 催眠療法
Posts: 8,074
austria us georgia
White Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 44,839
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo View Post
What if there was a health care system that had primary coverage,funded by the government that was mandatory?(THe coverage was basic doc appointments and minor surgeries, etc) Then a secondary coverage plan covered everything else but was optional.
Leech the system!!!

LEECH THE SYSTEM!!!


()
__________________
.
"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.

--Murray Rothbard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny. View Post
A liberal is just a libertarian who hasn't studied economics.

Join the Libertarians!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:31 AM
ABoyNamedSue's Avatar
ABoyNamedSue ABoyNamedSue is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In Republic of the United States of America
Age: 38
Posts: 4,161
fiji de saxony
ABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G_Haile12 View Post
Umm, lol, what exactly is the 'choice' is health care, I mean you've seen one hospital you've seen them all. I mean at these 'other' hospitals do you get different versions of antibiotics or something? There simply is no choice in health because the standards for medicine and care are national and uniform, so there's no room for difference. I mean there's not multiple ways to treat an infection is there? Medical science makes it's pretty clear what works and what doesn't.
How ironic. You've just explained exactly why socialist medicine will fail. Everything will be regulated by Mother Government, so there will be even LESS choice and difference.
__________________
"I should be calling collect from jail for the things I commit each night in my head" - D. Mustaine.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:32 AM
Craigers Craigers is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 24
Posts: 401
usa us georgia
Craigers is a jewel in the roughCraigers is a jewel in the roughCraigers is a jewel in the roughCraigers is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 2,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G_Haile12 View Post
Umm, lol, what exactly is the 'choice' is health care, I mean you've seen one hospital you've seen them all. I mean at these 'other' hospitals do you get different versions of antibiotics or something? There simply is no choice in health because the standards for medicine and care are national and uniform, so there's no room for difference. I mean there's not multiple ways to treat an infection is there? Medical science makes it's pretty clear what works and what doesn't.

'Choice' in health care is a right-wing sham.
The choice is in the policy. I for one, have a low monthly payment high deductible plan since my wife and I are young and have almost no medical expenses. We have the policy for the "just in case" factor. Others pay more per month for lower deductibles, and I am only talking about health savings accounts. There really are a ton of policies to choose from.

And yes, these days 'choice' is a right-wing term, not just in healthcare. Choice is not a word I hear many liberals use anymore. I wouldn't call it a sham, more like a slogan for most of us.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 07:31 AM
DanteAugustusGermanicus's Avatar
DanteAugustusGermanicus DanteAugustusGermanicus is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,257
usa us massachusetts
DanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really niceDanteAugustusGermanicus is just really nice
Credits: 4,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craigers View Post
The choice is in the policy. I for one, have a low monthly payment high deductible plan since my wife and I are young and have almost no medical expenses. We have the policy for the "just in case" factor. Others pay more per month for lower deductibles, and I am only talking about health savings accounts. There really are a ton of policies to choose from.

And yes, these days 'choice' is a right-wing term, not just in healthcare. Choice is not a word I hear many liberals use anymore. I wouldn't call it a sham, more like a slogan for most of us.
stating one is for individual choice of an insurer has nothing useful to add to the conversation. it is a stance without substantive debate

. in other democracies the issue has moved ahead. with health care, education and other issues we in the USA lag behind. why is that? the politicizing of issues by companies with a vested interest in profits over American overall interests.

choice? there is choice in a single payer system---choice of medical provider and you need look no further than switzerland
Quote:
Percentage of GDP spent on health care: 11.6

Average monthly family premium: $750, paid entirely by consumers; there are government subsidies for low-income citizens.

Co-payments: 10 percent of the cost of services, up to $420 per year.

What is it? The Swiss system is social insurance like in Japan and Germany, voted in by a national referendum in 1994. Switzerland didn't have far to go to achieve universal coverage; 95 percent of the population already had voluntary insurance when the law was passed. All citizens are required to have coverage; those not covered were automatically assigned to a company. The government provides assistance to those who can't afford the premiums.

How does it work? The Swiss example shows that universal coverage is possible, even in a highly capitalist nation with powerful insurance and pharmaceutical industries. Insurance companies are not allowed to make a profit on basic care and are prohibited from cherry-picking only young and healthy applicants. They can make money on supplemental insurance, however. As in Germany, the insurers negotiate with providers to set standard prices for services, but drug prices are set by the government.

What are the concerns? The Swiss system is the second most expensive in the world -- but it's still far cheaper than U.S. health care. Drug prices are still slightly higher than in other European nations, and even then the discounts may be subsidized by the more expensive U.S. market, where some Swiss drug companies make one-third of their profits. In general, the Swiss do not have gatekeeper doctors, although some insurance plans require them or give a discount to consumers who use them.
__________________
_________________

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know them by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against them.
-Jonathan Swift

---"Thoughts On Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting."
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 07:50 AM
Whaler17's Avatar
Whaler17 Whaler17 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,846
Whaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud ofWhaler17 has much to be proud of
Credits: 15,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G_Haile12 View Post
Umm, lol, what exactly is the 'choice' is health care, I mean you've seen one hospital you've seen them all. I mean at these 'other' hospitals do you get different versions of antibiotics or something? There simply is no choice in health because the standards for medicine and care are national and uniform, so there's no room for difference. I mean there's not multiple ways to treat an infection is there? Medical science makes it's pretty clear what works and what doesn't.

'Choice' in health care is a right-wing sham.
BUZZZZZZ! WRONG!
The levels of service at various locations vary, as do the physical facilities. Sizes of rooms, convenience of location, etc..... are elements of choice.

Now if we implement what you are suggesting, they would all be uniformly bad!
__________________
Not many people know this, but I'm really famous!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Universal Mandatory E-Verification Clay Immigration 65 08-13-2008 11:33 PM
Universal Mandatory E-Verification Clay Immigration 35 07-21-2008 09:39 PM
Mandatory Miilitary Service Like In Israel crestwood33 Elections & Campaigns 83 05-07-2008 12:24 PM
Mandatory Sentencing ForceoftheTruth Political Opinions & Beliefs 20 05-18-2006 08:35 AM
Supreme Court tosses out mandatory federal sentencing guidel ben-franklin Current Events 2 01-12-2005 10:59 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden