Shhhhhh.....

(Let them split the commie vote)

__________________
.

"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.

--Murray Rothbard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny. A liberal is just a libertarian who hasn't studied economics.

And I was wondering the same thing.

Do you actually know what Nader's ideals are and what Paul's are?

__________________
.

"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.

--Murray Rothbard

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny. A liberal is just a libertarian who hasn't studied economics.

OOoh! A riddle! Let me try: Take away his credit card.

Did I get it?

__________________
My enduring personal, original quote: Many mistake what should rightly be called "passivism" for pacifism. Pacifism and passivism are COMPLETELY different.
-----------------
Ronald Reagan was not the only one to suffer from Alzheimer's Disease. America did, too.
-----------------
"I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." --President George W. Bush.
-----------------
-----------------
Los Angeles voters=dumber than rocks.

Lets do it again.....

__________________

I know that's a fake because the words are spelled correctly.

Good eye, Zig!

__________________
"If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer."

--President-elect Barack Obama
November 5, 2008

Well, I was going to say that formal pronouncements would not include an informal word like "couldn't" , but that's not as funny.

Plus some con would want to spend the whole day debating THAT point.

Especially the word "to". I figured he'd write it the way he pronounces it.

"Tuh".

__________________
I've had a perfectly wonderful evening......... but this wasn't it. -- Marx

They are both wanting less control from government, and yes their parties and beliefs are different, but not that different. Ralph Nader is about the only chance you have for a real president. My vote my go to pot, but how can the main 2 parties lose a vote they were never going to have? The choices are to vote for two losers who will do nothing but go to war to get control over those oil wells. They should have spent that war money on installing solar power in government buildings. The people would have to do the same.

Nader is the way to go, and some people's views on socialism is scary because it used to be those were the Republican views. Republican is now Nazi, so you people voting for a party, don't even know what's what anymore. Ralph Nader is not a communist. Ralph is defending the constitution of the United States. I haven't heard that from anyone except Ron Paul.

Don't throw your vote way for 20 years of war with Middle east countries for oil. I'm not begging for anyone to vote for him, I'm stating a fact. I'm voting for RALPH NADER. He's as far from communist as you can get, so you need to do some research.

Realistically, he doesn't stand a chance.

But wouldn't it be abso-freaking-lutely hillarious to see the look on his face.

"What? I won what!?!"