I'm voting for Ralph Nader. He's the best candidate for presidency since Ron Paul pulled from the race. He's got great ideas for international and national relations, wants to protect our constitution, bring respectability back to our fallen country, and is the only one running that deserves the position.

Vote for Ralph Nader!


Do we really want to go to war every 5 years for free oil? Five years in Iraq, next 5 years in Iran, then 5 years in Isreal fighting Palestinians. We need a president who has no hidden agendas, religiously or politically.




http://www.votenader.org/

Ralph Nader On Democracy now!

http://www.democracynow.org/


http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/18/stream

Who?

Ron Paul has a better chance at being president.

Ice cubes have better chances in Hell, than Paul does at being the president.

__________________
"I should be calling collect from jail for the things I commit each night in my head" - D. Mustaine.

No thank you!

__________________
R.I.P. Molly, I miss you every day!!

Im a Tarte, what! you want some of this?


And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. Thomas Jefferson

lemme think about it for a minute , no

__________________
Aint but three things in this world thats worth a solitary dime,
But old dogs and children and watermelon wine.
Tom T. Hall
http://www.politicalforum.com/group.php?groupid=43

The dems already have a commie candidate, why do you guys need a second one?

How do you know that he has no hidden agendas?

__________________
My enduring personal, original quote: Many mistake what should rightly be called "passivism" for pacifism. Pacifism and passivism are COMPLETELY different.
-----------------
Ronald Reagan was not the only one to suffer from Alzheimer's Disease. America did, too.
-----------------
"I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." --President George W. Bush.
-----------------
-----------------
Los Angeles voters=dumber than rocks.

When it comes to really trusting the candidates, I would definitely have more trust for Ralph than all the other candidates. One of his biggest points is that money and corporations have taken over the political process. It costs a fortune to be elected to major political office in this country and that means the pols are spending a large majority of their time fundraising. Those that give large sums of money are not doing it for democracy. They expect a payback. Ralph has also pointed out the role media has in electing a candidate. If the press doesn't take a candidate seriously, neither do the voters.

Ralph would look out for US citizens more than any other candidate and has proven that by his role as a consumer advocate. What's funny is that people who put down his candidacy are the same ones who complain that all politicians are crooked. He's not smooth and he lacks that charisma.

Too bad they won't allow him in the debates. Ralph would definitely represent change.

no.
you cant make me.
im pretty sure he would do what he thought was right,
but im also pretty sure hes at least a little bit crazy.
i voted Nader in 2000.
never again.
or rather,
only if he were running against michael moore and pat robertson would i vote for ralph nader again.

__________________

How do you go from Ron Paul to Ralph Nader?

__________________
Signature: