Lou Dobbs: Bush Should Be Impeached for Salmonella Outbreak
CNN host says leadership in 'sorry condition' and inability to 'protect the American consumer' is 'sufficient reason to impeach a president.'

By Jeff Poor
Business & Media Institute
6/20/2008 12:47:50 PM



CNN’s Lou Dobbs has been on a tear about the recent tainted-tomato salmonella outbreak, but this time he’s taken it a step further and is calling for the ultimate political punishment.

The “Lou Dobbs Tonight” host placed the blame for the recent salmonella outbreak squarely on President George W. Bush, calling for his impeachment on the June 19 broadcast. Contaminated tomatoes from an unknown source or sources have sickened 383 people since April, according to the Associated Press.

“You know, I have heard a lot of reasons over the years as to why George W. Bush should be impeached,” Dobbs said. “For them to leave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in this state, its leadership in this sorry condition and to have no capacity apparently or will to protect the American consumer – that is alone to me sufficient reason to impeach a president who has made this agency possible and has ripped its guts out in its ability to protect the American consumer.”


“It’s insane what’s going on here,” said a visibly angry Dobbs. “Is there any sense of embarrassment on the part of the leadership of that agency?”

On June 18, Dobbs called the FDA “excessively intellectually challenged.” The night before he called the FDA “moronic.”

“The FDA, led by complete moronic, unengaged incompetents,” Dobbs said on his June 17 broadcast. “The idea that they would sit there and say that they’re not going to reveal where a cluster of this outbreak occurred, this is arrogant beyond belief. Who in the world do these idiots think they are? Who do they think they’re working for?”

He also implicated Bush in that tirade: “As for this administration, were a responsible president at the helm of this country, I would wonder why he is not taking action, but then again, this is of course his FDA and his legacy.”



http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...620123425.aspx

lol , I want Bush impeached because my pool pump crapped out

__________________
Aint but three things in this world thats worth a solitary dime,
But old dogs and children and watermelon wine.
Tom T. Hall
http://www.obamatruth.org/

I want Bush impeached because I don't have a pool!

well he should be impeached my dog ran out of treats

__________________
Aint but three things in this world thats worth a solitary dime,
But old dogs and children and watermelon wine.
Tom T. Hall
http://www.obamatruth.org/

This kind of stuff happens when you downsize government too much. It is common sense that if you cut funding for federal agencies and de-regulate industries, you will get such things as lead in toys and diseased food--duh.

__________________

I want Bush impeached b/c we are winning in Iraq. I want defeat not victory.

Bush probably did this so he could kill off more of the population like he's doing now in Iowa where he's sending flood releif to Iraq instead of Iowa. He killed lots in being lazy and slow in the Katrina disaster, so no samenalla? That would work.

He probably really just invested in corn fields and tomato farms in the US and was hoping to drive the prices up. More his line of thought.


http://www.radionetherlands.nl/curre...80620-oil-iraq


Oil companies return to IraqBy Henk Sjoerd Oosterhoff*

20-06-2008

International oil companies are negotiating their return to Iraq 36 years after their expulsion from the country by former dictator Saddam Hussein. On 30 June, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, BP and ExxonMobil will sign agreements with Baghdad about providing maintenance work and technical support for Iraqi oil facilities over the next two years.



An oilfield in Kirkuk, in northern Iraq
Photo: Flickr/James Gordon
The oil companies have offered all sorts of enticements to secure the favour of the Iraqi government. They are offering the use of the most modern technologies, they have made countless analyses of the country's oil supplies, and during the past two years their experts have been touring Iraq offering free advice and training. Of course, they did this in the hope of securing contracts and huge profits at a later date.
According to Lucia van Geuns, an energy expert at the Clingendael Institute's International Energy Programme:

"It's a win-win situation. As a result of the events of the past years the Iraqi companies have not been able to maintain the same level as international companies. These companies can look forward to a bright future."


New exploitation law
For the time being only short-term contracts for maintenance and repair work will be agreed. The international firms will be paid as contractors who are delivering services ("service agreements"). Nothing has been agreed concerning the exploration and exploitation of new fields. The Iraqi parliament has been unable to agree to a new law regulating mining and exploitation.
The director of the Cambridge Energy Research Associates' Middle East and Africa Department, Leila Benali, says the move is an important first step. The provision of service agreements is the only creative way of circumventing the deadlocked talks in parliament. By negotiating agreements with a limited number of companies for at most one or two years, it will be possible to increase production from the current level of 2.5 million barrels a day to up to 3 million barrels. The Iraqis are hoping to produce 6 million barrels five years from now.

Big prize
The Saddam era and the US-led invasion of Iraq have left their marks on the country's oil fields. Ms Benali dos not think it will be easy to renew production at fields which are no longer operating. And, because of the security situation, insurance fees are enormous. However, the companies are willing to take the risk since, as Leila Benali puts it:

"Everybody is waiting for the big prize - the giant fields in the south. There have been a lot of talks between the authorities and the companies about whether they will receive contracts once their service agreements have ended, or if they will still have to compete with other companies. So of course it's an attempt to gain a foothold in an effort to win the big prize everybody is hoping for."

Effect on oil prices
Would increased Iraqi production lower oil prices? Ms Benali says it would take another few years to answer this question. The price of oil wouldn't be affected by a mere half a million barrels from Iraq. The Clingendael Institute's energy expert Van Geuns also does not expect an immediate reduction in oil prices:

"Maybe in five years when Iraq is producing more and heading towards six million barrels a day, which is what they are hoping to produce within five years. Surely those extra 3.5 million barrels would have an effect. But I doubt that oil prices will drop dramatically

ooh knock it off

__________________
Aint but three things in this world thats worth a solitary dime,
But old dogs and children and watermelon wine.
Tom T. Hall
http://www.obamatruth.org/

I want Bush impeached because all welfare giveme gals don't have 60 inch TV 's

__________________
Aint but three things in this world thats worth a solitary dime,
But old dogs and children and watermelon wine.
Tom T. Hall
http://www.obamatruth.org/

I want Bush impeached because my dogs won't pick up their own crap.

__________________
Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies
but not terrorists.