Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:23 AM
Anikdote's Avatar
Anikdote Anikdote is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: here
Posts: 4,349
usa us georgia
Anikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond reputeAnikdote has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 18,686
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
You mean, the pre-condition of "you must stop enriching uranium" -- which North Korea hasn't stopped doing?
ahem!

Quote:
N. Korea Destroys Nuke Cooling Tower
June 27, 2008
Associated Press
SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea destroyed the most visible symbol of its nuclear weapons program June 27, according to a news report, in a sign of its commitment to stop making plutonium for atomic bombs.

The reported demolition of the 60-foot-tall cooling tower at its main reactor complex was a gesture in response to U.S. concessions granted after the North delivered a declaration June 26 of its nuclear programs under an agreement at international arms talks.

South Korean TV network MBC said the reactor blast occurred shortly after 4 p.m. local time before an audience of international TV cameras. There were no other immediate details.
/steps off soapbox.
__________________

Love Freedom?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:23 AM
sunnyside sunnyside is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,356
usa
sunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud of
Credits: 16,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
Which "demands" were those? Stopping the enrichment of uranium?
No. It was

HAVING
MULTI
NATION
TALKS
INSTEAD
OF
THE
UNILATERAL
TALKS
NK
WANTED
WITH
THE
US


You've got at least five people trying to tell you this. Get it through your head and move onto something else like you comment about the USSR/China talks.

Last edited by sunnyside; 06-27-2008 at 08:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:31 AM
Liberty's Avatar
Liberty Liberty is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,705
usa us georgia
Liberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud ofLiberty has much to be proud of
Credits: 23,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anikdote View Post
SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea destroyed the most visible symbol of its nuclear weapons program June 27, according to a news report, in a sign of its commitment to stop making plutonium for atomic bombs.
That has nothing to do with their uranium enrichment. The uranium enrichment program is an entirely separate effort. One, as Jovial implied, over which we still need to be concerned.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:33 AM
The Jovial One's Avatar
The Jovial One The Jovial One is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 53
Posts: 6,296
The Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond reputeThe Jovial One has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 153,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyside View Post
No. It was

HAVING
MULTI
NATION
TALKS
INSTEAD
OF
THE
UNILATERAL
TALKS
NK
WANTED
WITH
THE
US


You've got at least five people trying to tell you this. Get it through your head and move onto something else like you comment about the USSR/China talks.
Ah. And what a FINE condition it was. Was Bush scared to be alone with Kim?

(I love watching you guys twist and writhe to defend Bush for doing the same sort of thing you condemn Obama for. Very athletic.)
__________________
"If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer."
--President-elect Barack Obama
November 5, 2008
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:35 AM
MasTequila's Avatar
MasTequila MasTequila is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,332
usa us illinois
MasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 32,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
Ah. And what a FINE condition it was. Was Bush scared to be alone with Kim?

(I love watching you guys twist and writhe to defend Bush for doing the same sort of thing you condemn Obama for. Very athletic.)
I think GW wanted the nations around N. Korea involved, because they can apply pressure consistently. I agree with you though, GW shouldn't have talked with him. We should have bombed the crap out of him.
__________________
Barack Obama 144 lies and counting.

Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies, but not terrorists.

democrats believe it is okay to taser a 10 year old if this stance will get their guy elected.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:36 AM
lavell12's Avatar
lavell12 lavell12 is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,090
usa us north carolina
lavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud of
Credits: 23,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
Ah. And what a FINE condition it was. Was Bush scared to be alone with Kim?

(I love watching you guys twist and writhe to defend Bush for doing the same sort of thing you condemn Obama for. Very athletic.)
ya i'm sure bush is scared of a korean midget.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 08:39 AM
lavell12's Avatar
lavell12 lavell12 is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,090
usa us north carolina
lavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud oflavell12 has much to be proud of
Credits: 23,721
Default

Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 09:19 AM
sunnyside sunnyside is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,356
usa
sunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud ofsunnyside has much to be proud of
Credits: 16,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jovial One View Post
Ah. And what a FINE condition it was. Was Bush scared to be alone with Kim?

(I love watching you guys twist and writhe to defend Bush for doing the same sort of thing you condemn Obama for. Very athletic.)
Please just sit down with your glasses and read your own thread. We should be talking about these points instead of you asking the questions that had been addressed pages back.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sunnyside View Post
The difference in unilateral vs multi-nation is that a single nation can bomb someone just fine. But a single nation using diplomacy and sanctions is extremely weak as the other country can just turn to other nations for trade and support. (Though it would have been far better to have the UN behind us in Iraq or really not to have gone, but that's off topic anyway).
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 09:23 AM
whatsyurprob's Avatar
whatsyurprob whatsyurprob is offline
Banned
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Look behind you.
Age: 46
Posts: 1,077
usa us california
whatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 28,827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP5 View Post
This is just ONE STEP in the multi-nation negotiations. It doesn't stop here. And North Korea will be held to following through on PROVING they are doing what they say they are doing. There WERE preconditions about this deal----it began with the insistence from the Bush administration that the talks to six-nation talks; not unilateral as occured during the Clinton administration and as Obama advocates.

It's amazing how many libs can't comprehend the huge differences.
And it's amazing how your narrow-mindedness can't grasp plain english.

Bush, stood up at that podium in Israel and stated that anyone who would negotiate with "terrorists or radicals" would be likened as appeasers to the nazis. This is an unequivocal, unambiguous fact. It's also a fact that he mentioned NOTHING about "unilateral" or the Clinton Administration. MOF, he didn't even mention Obama by name, but, McCain did.

Why is it that McCain, isn't expressing his disappointment with Bush for being a hypocrite? I mean, what better way to 'distance' yourself from the worst President in history other than to speak out about it? Looks like McCain is showing his true colors and all of America sees it.

Well, , , almost all.


PROB
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2008, 09:35 AM
whatsyurprob's Avatar
whatsyurprob whatsyurprob is offline
Banned
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Look behind you.
Age: 46
Posts: 1,077
usa us california
whatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 28,827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty View Post
That has nothing to do with their uranium enrichment. The uranium enrichment program is an entirely separate effort. One, as Jovial implied, over which we still need to be concerned.
Alright, genius. How do U explain the blowing-up of the cooling tower at the "enrichment" site today?

And I have still yet to see a link on these Multi national talks. Not saying they don't exist, but a link sure would be a little more credible than a bunch of repubs just saying it's so.


PROB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
negotiating with the enemy: US foreign policy nonsqtr Political Opinions & Beliefs 10 02-01-2008 03:54 PM
Today's Bush Outrage: On This Date in Bush History blueButGlad Political Opinions & Beliefs 39 12-07-2007 07:58 AM
Bush, Impostor - Q for Bush Supporters hankdane Political Opinions & Beliefs 15 03-09-2006 10:21 AM
Now Iraq has tasted democracy, the Arab tyrants are shaking jimmmco Current Events 0 02-14-2005 04:24 PM
Couple Removed From Bush Speech For Wearing Anti-Bush Shirts bitwise Current Events 86 07-18-2004 10:43 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden