Oh sure. . . They got control of their country alright. A country who's president is a puppet inserted by the U.S.. There's also this thing about a foreign military occupying their country and killing their citizens.

PROB

Y'all can say whatever you want about Obama said this, Bush said this and did that, while McCain would have done this, and it doesn't mean a thing.

What really matters is this -

North Korea took a small step towards maybe making this world a little safer for us all to live.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is a good thing!

__________________
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others." - Groucho Marx

Their President was not inserted by anyone. He was freely elected. If you have actual evidence to the contrary, feel free to post it.



Please post your evidence that the US is there against the will of the freely elected Iraqi government.

__________________
My Political Blog (Most recent update Oct 3rd) - Which Flame Warrior are you?

Make sure U check all the links when U click.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/ju...iraq-j03.shtml

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...elligerent.htm



http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/27/iraqis-poll/

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/51624/

I could go on all day, but I think U get it.


PROB

Does that mean that we move all of our troops out of S.Korea first?


E.Pluribus Unum

__________________
E.Pluribus Unum

People of power have NO good will and people of good will have NO power.

If you think Education is Expensive try Ignorance.

Its weak too speak and blame somebody else when you destroy yourself.

I'm not even involved in this but you really went to the far reaches of the internet for those links:


http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/ju...iraq-j03.shtml = World Socialist Web Sites, yikes.

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...elligerent.htm = OP ED written by:

Whom I've never heard of but maybe he's credible?

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/27/iraqis-poll/ = Think progress, usually means progressive, and the group that did the polling, WorldPublicOpinion.org, seems to have some credible names associated with it. I'd consider it legit and I even found this snippet about them on Wiki:
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/51624/ = This is also just a blog written by a blogger at Alternet.org and Raed Jarrar who is the Iraq Consultant to the American Friends Service Committee. The AFSC says it "Supports Quacker Values and criticize the war in Iraq on it's home page, but he's not a journalist so bias isn't unethical or anything.

__________________

lmao your lucky they didn't link ya to Huffington!!

__________________
Aint but three things in this world thats worth a solitary dime,
But old dogs and children and watermelon wine.
Tom T. Hall
http://www.politicalforum.com/group.php?groupid=43

Mr. Bush has not directly negotiated with Korea. So the very premise of this argument false thus relegating the whole of the argument to spurious.

In point of fact, the Bush strategy actually accomplished precisely what it set out to do, it used tough minded, but well reasoned diplomacy which forced a nation exceedingly hostile to the US to capitulate to US demands;this despite initial demands by the communist North Korean government that they negotiate directly and unilaterally with the Bush administration. The Bush strategy is proof certain that the stated policy of B. Hussein Obama is the perfect example of what NOT to do, as it mirrors the failed policy of the Clinton regime, which lead directly to this crisis.

Appeasing socialists will only beget socialist power. They'e snakes and never to be trusted by anyone, at anytime or for any reason.

And I am sure you will know how to spell Sweden better next time.

I posted this on another thread, but it is relevant here as well. It is written by the Chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq, Hans Blix, a Swede.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ar/20/iraq.usa

There you go with that "socialists" thing again.

Do you have to put it into every post whether it is relevant or not?