Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:27 PM
FreedomSeeker FreedomSeeker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 936
FreedomSeeker will become famous soon enoughFreedomSeeker will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish.Cursory View Post
We could eat the extra people and solve world hunger. How about we have a worldwide episode of Survivor and the people who get "voted off" get eaten? That's a ratings avalanche right there.

By the way, if I work for "Keep It In Your Pants, Inc." and they find out I used the loo, do I get fired?
Like in the movie/book "Dune", the standard-issue outfits we wear here at KIIYP just "absorb" excrement.

Cannibalism, while a great way to get some much needed protein in one's diet to be sure, is not one of our 5 solutions. But keep those ideas coming!

Seriously, though, shouldn't people who want to create many future people ("I want to have 8 kids") be shown that they are destroying the planet more than the "evil" corporate owner of a nuclear-power plant is?



This article shows the bleak future, if we don't do something about overpopulation of our environment NOW! It's starting, folks:
"FOOT RIOTS IN EGYPT"
Al Jazeera
March 13, 2008
The UN secretary general has warned that millions of people are at risk of starvation as global food stocks have fallen to their lowest levels for decades. [...]
From: http://www.infowars.com/?p=791

Comments?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:31 PM
FreedomSeeker FreedomSeeker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 936
FreedomSeeker will become famous soon enoughFreedomSeeker will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe1991 View Post
Please note that the article carefully points out that, for example, abortion is not a solution that we are advocating...as well as, I would ad, NOT genocide, NOT eating people, NOT wars, NOT euthanasia, etc.

Just these 5 solutions:
1. Keep It In Your Pants
2. Vasectomy or get your tubes tied
3. Regularly use birth control!
4. Reform religions which result in many children like Catholicism, Islam, and Mormonism.
5. Last resort: limit family size to ONE kid.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:38 PM
FreedomSeeker FreedomSeeker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 936
FreedomSeeker will become famous soon enoughFreedomSeeker will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe1991 View Post
We are looking for a Board Chairman, and I wonder if Hannibal Lector is available? We checked into Jeffrey Dahmer, but...

Look, if we don't do something NOW, we'll end up having our freedoms taken away by the government....just like the people of the most populous nation in world history are having done to them right now!


The following article is from http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2005/mar/05030107.html
FORCED ABORTION STILL PART OF CHINA'S POPULATION CONTROL REGIME SAYS U.S. HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT
One million branches of Chinese Family Planning Association enforce one child policy
WASHINGTON, March 1, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – On February 28, 2005, the US State Department released its 2004 Human Rights Report. The report entitled "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices" is submitted to Congress by the Department of State in compliance with laws requiring the department to submit "a full and complete report regarding the status of internationally recognized human rights . . . in countries that receive (US) assistance.”
Regarding China, the report notes that “Violence against women, including imposition of a coercive birth limitation policy that resulted in instances of forced abortion and forced sterilization, continued to be a problem, as did prostitution.” [...]
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:39 PM
FreedomSeeker FreedomSeeker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 936
FreedomSeeker will become famous soon enoughFreedomSeeker will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe1991 View Post
We know how, we also know when to stop.
How about at ONE kid, like option #5?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:41 PM
FreedomSeeker FreedomSeeker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 936
FreedomSeeker will become famous soon enoughFreedomSeeker will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The12thMan View Post
Actually, what he forgot to take into account is the fact that it takes two people to have a kid.
Hmmmm, so I guess only 525 years instead of 500 years.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:46 PM
FreedomSeeker FreedomSeeker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 936
FreedomSeeker will become famous soon enoughFreedomSeeker will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paragon View Post
Guess that means that if you kill someone then you're future-killing 2,097,152 people from 500 years in the future.

But you forgot to take into account the fact that people die.

Here's the stats for the US
Birth rate: 14.18 births/1,000 population (2008 est.)
Death rate: 8.27 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est.)

Here's the stats for Swaziland (they have the highest death rate)
Birth rate: 26.6 births/1,000 population (2008 est.)
Death rate: 30.7 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est.)

And here's the stats for the UAE (they have the lowest death rate)
Birth rate: 16.06 births/1,000 population (2008 est.)
Death rate: 2.13 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est.)

As you can see the birthrate of the US and the UAE are pretty close. However people in the UAE die a lot less. Also, while the Birthrate of Swaziland is significantly higher than the other two, their death rate is even more significantly higher.
Muslim nations have very high birth rates...please don't try to deny that.

Also, no, those 2 million people don't all live at the SAME time, of course, that's ridiculous.

But mathematically it can not be denied that if you have only TWO kids in the future, that the most likely scenario (look, your offspring could have a *dozen* kids each, I don't know....which would be MANY MILLIONS more people!) is that TWO MILLION more people, over the not really too distant future, will be harming the environment.
Shocking, no?

Last edited by FreedomSeeker; 06-29-2008 at 01:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:50 PM
BillyBob BillyBob is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 6,127
usa us tennessee
BillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond reputeBillyBob has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 6,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The12thMan View Post
Actually, what he forgot to take into account is the fact that it takes two people to have a kid.
Yes, and the original 2 people will be dead long before 500 years gets here. I'm surprised none of this occurred to this....um....poster.


If each couple has only 2 offspring, the number of people increased over 500 years eating up all those precious resources is.........ZERO!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:56 PM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,672
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 123,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBob View Post
Yes, and the original 2 people will be dead long before 500 years gets here. I'm surprised none of this occurred to this....um....poster.


If each couple has only 2 offspring, the number of people increased over 500 years eating up all those precious resources is.........ZERO!
Exactly.
__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.

Last edited by The12thMan; 06-29-2008 at 01:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 01:59 PM
FreedomSeeker FreedomSeeker is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 936
FreedomSeeker will become famous soon enoughFreedomSeeker will become famous soon enough
Credits: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBob View Post
Yes, and the original 2 people will be dead long before 500 years gets here. I'm surprised none of this occurred to this....um....poster.


If each couple has only 2 offspring, the number of people increased over 500 years eating up all those precious resources is.........ZERO!
Wrong. If a person does NOT selfishly reproduce, the number of future people who suck up the earth's precious resouces will be, from that's person's lack of reproducing, ZERO (call it scenario "A"). If that person selfishly reproduces (call it scenario "B"), then the number will be most likely (no, not all at once, of course) 2 million or so.

Scenario "A" results in 2 million less people, over that 500 year period, than scenario "B".

Last edited by FreedomSeeker; 06-29-2008 at 02:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 02:01 PM
The12thMan's Avatar
The12thMan The12thMan is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,672
usa us texas
The12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond reputeThe12thMan has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 123,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomSeeker View Post
Wrong. If a person does NOT selfishly reproduce, the number of future people who suck up the earth's precious resouces will be, from that's person's reproducing, will be ZERO. If that person selfishly reproduces, then the number will be most likely (no, not all at once, of course) 2 million or so.
A person cannot reproduce, whether selfishly or not.
__________________
Do you know what it's like to fall in the mud and get kicked... in the head... with an iron boot? Of course you don't, no one does. It never happens. It's a dumb question... skip it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
54M ‘Pants Suit’ Judge Sues To Get Job Back SweetnessBlog Political Blogs 1 05-06-2008 12:11 PM
I support John Edwards—and I’m not wearing pants! SeminalBlog Political Blogs 0 01-22-2008 07:50 AM
The 54 million dollar pants Jake Current Events 1 06-17-2007 09:48 PM
Nice Pants Liberty Humor & Satire 0 08-12-2005 10:19 AM
b4 u make a mess in your pants over China lonerider103 Current Events 3 07-15-2005 03:26 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden