Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 05:21 PM
Forest119's Avatar
Forest119 Forest119 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vientiane LPDR
Age: 35
Posts: 636
laos
Forest119 is a jewel in the roughForest119 is a jewel in the roughForest119 is a jewel in the roughForest119 is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 3,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomSeeker View Post
If you have only 2 more kids (“future people”), and all your offspring averaged only 2 kids then in ONLY 500 years (a mere BLIP in time) you would have increased the total number of people who suck the world's resources by over TWO MILLION people! Mathematically, you can't deny this.



IF AVERAGES ONLY *TWO* KIDS PER GENERATION:

# Of Years……......# NEW People
From Now…… …..That Generation
0……………………..…..….2
25…………………………...4
50…………………………...8
75…………………………...16
100………………………….32
125………………………….64
150………………………….128
175………………………….256
200………………………….512
225………………………….1,024
250…………………………..2,048
275…………………………..4,096
300…………………………..8,192
325…………………………..16,384
350…………………………..32,768
375…………………………..65,536
400…………………………...131,072
425……………………………262,144
450……………………………524,288
475……………………………1,048,576
500……………………………2,097,152
Ironclad proof that our educational system is failing to properly educate our populace in the subject of math.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 05:35 PM
whatsyurprob's Avatar
whatsyurprob whatsyurprob is offline
Banned
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Look behind you.
Age: 46
Posts: 1,077
usa us california
whatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of lightwhatsyurprob is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 28,827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomSeeker View Post
If you have only 2 more kids (“future people”), and all your offspring averaged only 2 kids then in ONLY 500 years (a mere BLIP in time) you would have increased the total number of people who suck the world's resources by over TWO MILLION people! Mathematically, you can't deny this.



IF AVERAGES ONLY *TWO* KIDS PER GENERATION:

# Of Years……......# NEW People
From Now…… …..That Generation
0……………………..…..….2
25…………………………...4
50…………………………...8
75…………………………...16
100………………………….32
125………………………….64
150………………………….128
175………………………….256
200………………………….512
225………………………….1,024
250…………………………..2,048
275…………………………..4,096
300…………………………..8,192
325…………………………..16,384
350…………………………..32,768
375…………………………..65,536
400…………………………...131,072
425……………………………262,144
450……………………………524,288
475……………………………1,048,576
500……………………………2,097,152



Here we rank the top 5 ways you can create TWO MILLION fewer people
1. Keep It In Your Pants
2. Vasectomy or get your tubes tied
3. Regularly use birth control!
4. Reform religions which result in many children like Catholicism, Islam, and Mormonism. For example, don't Muslim families in Europe outbreed natives by over 2.5 to 1?
5. Last resort: limit family size to ONE kid.

This makes switching from an SUV to a hybrid (maybe only a 20% reduction in your total carbon footprint) seem incredibly inconsequential, no? Two million more resource-users on the planet over 500 years, due to your greed, is a 200,000,000% increase in your carbon footprint!

Yes, recycle, take public transportation, etc….but just realize that you not creating more people is by far and away the biggest thing you will ever do to help our planet.

In fact, in only about 75 years or so (2083), on average THIRTY more people will have driven cars, used our dwindling resources, etc…..thanks to you, amigo.

Arguably, creating future people is very selfish of you, no?

I'm Director of the new help-the-environment-by-reducing-population-growth group provocatively named "Keep It In Your Pants (For The Environment), Inc.", by the way (yes, I'm serious.)
It's hard to forget that name, no? We are aka "Environment and Population Institute."

Population-growth-reduction makes Al Gore's environmental work PALE by comparison, when you sit down and really think about it!

Do we advocate population-control methods such as forced abortions (which already take place - in China), civil wars, etc.? No, we don't.

If you want to join our very new group, Keep It In Your Pants (For The Environment), then please notify us.

Your feedback?


By Terry Martin
Director of Freedom News http://freedom-news.blogspot.com
Director of Keep It In Your Pants, Inc.

Sorry, but this is America, not China.


PROB
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 05:50 PM
Forest119's Avatar
Forest119 Forest119 is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vientiane LPDR
Age: 35
Posts: 636
laos
Forest119 is a jewel in the roughForest119 is a jewel in the roughForest119 is a jewel in the roughForest119 is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 3,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatsyurprob View Post
Sorry, but this is America, not China.


PROB
Actually, it's still bad math, even in China.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 06:13 PM
ABoyNamedSue's Avatar
ABoyNamedSue ABoyNamedSue is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In Republic of the United States of America
Age: 38
Posts: 4,161
fiji de saxony
ABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemur View Post
Am I trippin' or did you just unwittingly admit that social health care could serve to help people live longer, possibly even healthier lives?
Yes...it does. The problem is...it helps the WRONG people live longer. The losers. The weaker of our species.

That's why we need to cut 'em loose, and let nature run its course. Let 'em have to worry about their own health insurance. If they can't fend for themselves, then that's "survival of the fittest." ...or the smartest.
__________________
"I should be calling collect from jail for the things I commit each night in my head" - D. Mustaine.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 07:42 PM
Greco Greco is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 587
Greco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to all
Credits: 9,051
Default

Have you ever looked at the avatar for ABoyNamedSue?

That’s one ugly looking dude. He also seems really, really angry in his photo. But that might not be an accurate assessment. His dour, scowling demeanor may not be anger at all, but actually just be frustration.

But frustration at what, you might ask.

It’s possible the origin of his frustration emanates from his displeasure directed at his fellow Republican, Senator Larry “Wide Guy” Craig.

Now, after spending all week working on, and perfecting his coded toe-tapping, when ABoyNamedSue enters his favorite stall at the bus station he just can’t get any action going. He probably blames Republican Senator Larry “Wide Guy” Craig for bringing all that attention on himself, creating a lack of Republican toe-tapers to troll for.

That would help explain his scowl, his dour persona reflected in the photo he carefully chose to advertise with. It’s not anger. He’s probably just all pent-up and frustrated, hoping for a return to the good old days.

We should just pity him.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 07:56 PM
Joe1991's Avatar
Joe1991 Joe1991 is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,987
usa us texas
Joe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 44,019
Icon17

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemur View Post
Am I trippin' or did you just unwittingly admit that social health care could serve to help people live longer, possibly even healthier lives?
***PERSONAL ATTACKS ARE NOT ALLOWED***

I will assume you were kidding and not give you a yellow card.
__________________
Obama/Biden 2008

Last edited by The12thMan; 06-29-2008 at 08:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 09:06 PM
ABoyNamedSue's Avatar
ABoyNamedSue ABoyNamedSue is offline
Site Moderator
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In Republic of the United States of America
Age: 38
Posts: 4,161
fiji de saxony
ABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond reputeABoyNamedSue has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco View Post
Have you ever looked at the avatar for ABoyNamedSue?

That’s one ugly looking dude. He also seems really, really angry in his photo. But that might not be an accurate assessment. His dour, scowling demeanor may not be anger at all, but actually just be frustration.

But frustration at what, you might ask.

It’s possible the origin of his frustration emanates from his displeasure directed at his fellow Republican, Senator Larry “Wide Guy” Craig.

Now, after spending all week working on, and perfecting his coded toe-tapping, when ABoyNamedSue enters his favorite stall at the bus station he just can’t get any action going. He probably blames Republican Senator Larry “Wide Guy” Craig for bringing all that attention on himself, creating a lack of Republican toe-tapers to troll for.

That would help explain his scowl, his dour persona reflected in the photo he carefully chose to advertise with. It’s not anger. He’s probably just all pent-up and frustrated, hoping for a return to the good old days.

We should just pity him.
You know...if you're gonna insult me, at least be original about it. You cut and pasted this entire diatribe from the other thread, you blasted me on.

For shame...
__________________
"I should be calling collect from jail for the things I commit each night in my head" - D. Mustaine.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 09:14 PM
Makedde's Avatar
Makedde Makedde is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Enjoying A Whipped Cream Bath With Tarja
Age: 25
Posts: 16,747
australia au victoria
Makedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond reputeMakedde has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 564,617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomSeeker View Post
If you have only 2 more kids (“future people”), and all your offspring averaged only 2 kids then in ONLY 500 years (a mere BLIP in time) you would have increased the total number of people who suck the world's resources by over TWO MILLION people! Mathematically, you can't deny this.



IF AVERAGES ONLY *TWO* KIDS PER GENERATION:

# Of Years……......# NEW People
From Now…… …..That Generation
0……………………..…..….2
25…………………………...4
50…………………………...8
75…………………………...16
100………………………….32
125………………………….64
150………………………….128
175………………………….256
200………………………….512
225………………………….1,024
250…………………………..2,048
275…………………………..4,096
300…………………………..8,192
325…………………………..16,384
350…………………………..32,768
375…………………………..65,536
400…………………………...131,072
425……………………………262,144
450……………………………524,288
475……………………………1,048,576
500……………………………2,097,152



Here we rank the top 5 ways you can create TWO MILLION fewer people
1. Keep It In Your Pants
2. Vasectomy or get your tubes tied
3. Regularly use birth control!
4. Reform religions which result in many children like Catholicism, Islam, and Mormonism. For example, don't Muslim families in Europe outbreed natives by over 2.5 to 1?
5. Last resort: limit family size to ONE kid.
How about have an abortion isntead of giving the kid up for adoption? That'd help too, you know - whether you like it or not.
__________________
The woman in my avatar is Cristina Scabbia and the woman in my profile picture is Tarja Turunen
Sun flames and moons glow, timeless the tides will flow, what will I face, what will be mine, fortune and fate the other side...

Public thanks to Catzmeow for enabling me to make my goal of half a million credits by Xmas.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 09:14 PM
Lackluster's Avatar
Lackluster Lackluster is online now
Analyst
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,672
usa us oregon
Lackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond reputeLackluster has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 12,924
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paragon View Post
Here's a fancy chart to try and explain it to you FreedomSeeker:


This chart begins with two families in row 1.
Each family has two children (seen in row 2).
Their children have children with the member of the opposite sex from the other family (seen in row 3).
And then their children do the same (seen in row 4). By this time row 1 is either dead or near dead.
This means that if each family continued to only have two children the population would fluctuate between 12 and 16.
But if you crossed a pink dot with a blue dot, wouldn't the resulting dot be, oh, like sorta magenta colored?
__________________
I've had a perfectly wonderful evening......... but this wasn't it. -- Marx
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2008, 09:38 PM
Kenny's Avatar
Kenny Kenny is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Birmingham, AL
Age: 17
Posts: 288
usa us alabama
Kenny is a jewel in the roughKenny is a jewel in the roughKenny is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 2,549
Send a message via AIM to Kenny
Default

Well, I guess nuclear weapons will prove to be useful.....joking lol. The government will eventually regulate birth rates. If you look over at China, they have already began putting forth laws to lower birth rates. The government will eventually have to force contraception and abortions. I am pretty sure that both the conseratives and liberals will change their position on abortion once there are 30 people to a house, every house is only 1 inches apart, plaques began, and resources deplete.

The most people on earth, the worst the quality of life will be. If I had to decide,
there would be no more then 1000 people living on earth. Everyone would be on birth control and getting abortions. The smaller the group, the happier everyone can be. We are already running out of oil and water, I feel sorry for those who live on this planet a few thousand years from now.....they'll be praying for a Hitler.
__________________
ShadyPolitics.com - My Blog
ShadyPolitics.com/forum - Political Forum (open)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
54M ‘Pants Suit’ Judge Sues To Get Job Back SweetnessBlog Political Blogs 1 05-06-2008 01:11 PM
I support John Edwardsβ€”and I’m not wearing pants! SeminalBlog Political Blogs 0 01-22-2008 08:50 AM
The 54 million dollar pants Jake Current Events 1 06-17-2007 10:48 PM
Nice Pants Liberty Humor & Satire 0 08-12-2005 11:19 AM
b4 u make a mess in your pants over China lonerider103 Current Events 3 07-15-2005 04:26 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden