If you have only 2 more kids (“future people”), and all your offspring averaged only 2 kids then in ONLY 500 years (a mere BLIP in time) you would have increased the total number of people who suck the world's resources by over TWO MILLION people! Mathematically, you can't deny this.



IF AVERAGES ONLY *TWO* KIDS PER GENERATION:

# Of Years……......# NEW People
From Now…… …..That Generation
0……………………..…..….2
25…………………………...4
50…………………………...8
75…………………………...16
100………………………….32
125………………………….64
150………………………….128
175………………………….256
200………………………….512
225………………………….1,024
250…………………………..2,048
275…………………………..4,096
300…………………………..8,192
325…………………………..16,384
350…………………………..32,768
375…………………………..65,536
400…………………………...131,072
425……………………………262,144
450……………………………524,288
475……………………………1,048,576
500……………………………2,097,152



Here we rank the top 5 ways you can create TWO MILLION fewer people
1. Keep It In Your Pants
2. Vasectomy or get your tubes tied
3. Regularly use birth control!
4. Reform religions which result in many children like Catholicism, Islam, and Mormonism. For example, don't Muslim families in Europe outbreed natives by over 2.5 to 1?
5. Last resort: limit family size to ONE kid.

This makes switching from an SUV to a hybrid (maybe only a 20% reduction in your total carbon footprint) seem incredibly inconsequential, no? Two million more resource-users on the planet over 500 years, due to your greed, is a 200,000,000% increase in your carbon footprint!

Yes, recycle, take public transportation, etc….but just realize that you not creating more people is by far and away the biggest thing you will ever do to help our planet.

In fact, in only about 75 years or so (2083), on average THIRTY more people will have driven cars, used our dwindling resources, etc…..thanks to you, amigo.

Arguably, creating future people is very selfish of you, no?

I'm Director of the new help-the-environment-by-reducing-population-growth group provocatively named "Keep It In Your Pants (For The Environment), Inc.", by the way (yes, I'm serious.)
It's hard to forget that name, no? We are aka "Environment and Population Institute."

Population-growth-reduction makes Al Gore's environmental work PALE by comparison, when you sit down and really think about it!

Do we advocate population-control methods such as forced abortions (which already take place - in China), civil wars, etc.? No, we don't.

If you want to join our very new group, Keep It In Your Pants (For The Environment), then please notify us.

Your feedback?


By Terry Martin
Director of Freedom News http://freedom-news.blogspot.com
Director of Keep It In Your Pants, Inc.

Thanks for the info! ....I always encourage conservatives not to breed.

__________________
Obama/Biden 2008

We could eat the extra people and solve world hunger. How about we have a worldwide episode of Survivor and the people who get "voted off" get eaten? That's a ratings avalanche right there.

By the way, if I work for "Keep It In Your Pants, Inc." and they find out I used the loo, do I get fired?

__________________
Two "no's" make a "yes". Can't argue with math.

__________________
Obama/Biden 2008

Of course, we don't worry about the liberals, cuz they don't know HOW to breed. We like to think of it as God's natural selection plan. If it wasn't for how willing their women were, they would die out.

Your math is wrong.

__________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~Ronald Reagan

Yes, this was directed only at conservatives. He he he.

But folks have to admit, this is the NUMBER ONE way to help the environment, no!?

Driving your little hybrid (instead of a regular car) to help the environment, PALES in comparison to roughly 2 million more future people sucking the planet's resources because of your carnal lust, no?

We know how, we also know when to stop.


Don't tease, names and numbers please?

__________________
Obama/Biden 2008

Guess that means that if you kill someone then you're future-killing 2,097,152 people from 500 years in the future.

But you forgot to take into account the fact that people die.

Here's the stats for the US
Birth rate: 14.18 births/1,000 population (2008 est.)
Death rate: 8.27 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est.)

Here's the stats for Swaziland (they have the highest death rate)
Birth rate: 26.6 births/1,000 population (2008 est.)
Death rate: 30.7 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est.)

And here's the stats for the UAE (they have the lowest death rate)
Birth rate: 16.06 births/1,000 population (2008 est.)
Death rate: 2.13 deaths/1,000 population (2008 est.)

As you can see the birthrate of the US and the UAE are pretty close. However people in the UAE die a lot less. Also, while the Birthrate of Swaziland is significantly higher than the other two, their death rate is even more significantly higher.

__________________
"We consider this our duty - to defend humanity against the scourge of intolerance, violence, and fanaticism." -Ahmed Shah Massoud
Ahmed Shah Massoud T-Shirt

Actually, what he forgot to take into account is the fact that it takes two people to have a kid.

__________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~Ronald Reagan