Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > General Political Chat > Political Opinions & Beliefs


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:35 PM
Greco Greco is offline
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 587
Greco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to allGreco is a name known to all
Credits: 9,051
Default Presidential Debates

With the general election now only four months away, it's time to begin discussion of the presidential debates between the Republican candidate and the Democrat candidate. On one side there is an elderly man who frequently becomes confused with his "facts", and on the other side is an energetic man that has displayed superior skills as an orator. But there is another interesting possibility looming. It would be a kind gesture on the part of the Democrat candidate to propose a special format for the debates.

Typically the debates have been broadcast in prime time over network television. Having the debates in prime time allows the potential for the maximum number of Americans to tune in and view them. However, this time that time slot could prove problematic for the Republican candidate, John McCain, who is the oldest person to ever run for the office of president. Most elderly people retire early in the evening and don't fare well when kept up past their bedtime. During the debates, not only is it a real possibility to find one candidate yawning, perhaps even nodding off, but keeping him up that late could produce a number of his already frequent "senior moments" during the debate which could prove embarrassing for the candidate and viewers alike.

It's not practical to consider a different time slot, which would adversely impact the number of Americans able to view the debates. But there is an even simpler solution to the dilemma. John McCain is basically running on the platform of continuing all the George W. Bush policies for a third term. By now we're all familiar with what those policies and positions are. We could propose allowing the Republican candidate to simply go ahead and retire at his usual 7pm bedtime. In his place we could have a big screen television set that replays some of George W. Bush's past speeches, which could then be debated against by the Democrat candidate.

In the morning, after having someone fix his comb-over, finishing off his glass of Metamucil, putting on a fresh Depends, and checking his PoliGrip for a secure fit, the Republican candidate could then simply open up the morning newspaper and see how he did the night before.

It would be a kind gesture on the part of the Democrat candidate to allow that unprecedented format change to occur.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 10:45 PM
Drewster Drewster is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 117
Drewster will become famous soon enough
Credits: 928
Send a message via AIM to Drewster Send a message via MSN to Drewster
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco View Post
With the general election now only four months away, it's time to begin discussion of the presidential debates between the Republican candidate and the Democrat candidate. On one side there is an elderly man who frequently becomes confused with his "facts", and on the other side is an energetic man that has displayed superior skills as an orator. But there is another interesting possibility looming. It would be a kind gesture on the part of the Democrat candidate to propose a special format for the debates.

Typically the debates have been broadcast in prime time over network television. Having the debates in prime time allows the potential for the maximum number of Americans to tune in and view them. However, this time that time slot could prove problematic for the Republican candidate, John McCain, who is the oldest person to ever run for the office of president. Most elderly people retire early in the evening and don't fare well when kept up past their bedtime. During the debates, not only is it a real possibility to find one candidate yawning, perhaps even nodding off, but keeping him up that late could produce a number of his already frequent "senior moments" during the debate which could prove embarrassing for the candidate and viewers alike.

It's not practical to consider a different time slot, which would adversely impact the number of Americans able to view the debates. But there is an even simpler solution to the dilemma. John McCain is basically running on the platform of continuing all the George W. Bush policies for a third term. By now we're all familiar with what those policies and positions are. We could propose allowing the Republican candidate to simply go ahead and retire at his usual 7pm bedtime. In his place we could have a big screen television set that replays some of George W. Bush's past speeches, which could then be debated against by the Democrat candidate.

In the morning, after having someone fix his comb-over, finishing off his glass of Metamucil, putting on a fresh Depends, and checking his PoliGrip for a secure fit, the Republican candidate could then simply open up the morning newspaper and see how he did the night before.

It would be a kind gesture on the part of the Democrat candidate to allow that unprecedented format change to occur.
I find your argument about the late time of the debates to be absolutely hilarious. Perhaps his tiredness should be displayed... what if some emergency happens after 7pm IF he becomes president?:-p Can America afford a "senior moment" during an emergency?

In all honesty though this thread must just be a joke, and u put a smile on my face. Well played.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2008, 03:47 AM
Jack Jack is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 374
Jack is a glorious beacon of lightJack is a glorious beacon of lightJack is a glorious beacon of lightJack is a glorious beacon of lightJack is a glorious beacon of lightJack is a glorious beacon of light
Credits: 4,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco View Post
With the general election now only four months away, it's time to begin discussion of the presidential debates between the Republican candidate and the Democrat candidate. On one side there is an elderly man who frequently becomes confused with his "facts", and on the other side is an energetic man that has displayed superior skills as an orator. But there is another interesting possibility looming. It would be a kind gesture on the part of the Democrat candidate to propose a special format for the debates.

Typically the debates have been broadcast in prime time over network television. Having the debates in prime time allows the potential for the maximum number of Americans to tune in and view them. However, this time that time slot could prove problematic for the Republican candidate, John McCain, who is the oldest person to ever run for the office of president. Most elderly people retire early in the evening and don't fare well when kept up past their bedtime. During the debates, not only is it a real possibility to find one candidate yawning, perhaps even nodding off, but keeping him up that late could produce a number of his already frequent "senior moments" during the debate which could prove embarrassing for the candidate and viewers alike.

It's not practical to consider a different time slot, which would adversely impact the number of Americans able to view the debates. But there is an even simpler solution to the dilemma. John McCain is basically running on the platform of continuing all the George W. Bush policies for a third term. By now we're all familiar with what those policies and positions are. We could propose allowing the Republican candidate to simply go ahead and retire at his usual 7pm bedtime. In his place we could have a big screen television set that replays some of George W. Bush's past speeches, which could then be debated against by the Democrat candidate.

In the morning, after having someone fix his comb-over, finishing off his glass of Metamucil, putting on a fresh Depends, and checking his PoliGrip for a secure fit, the Republican candidate could then simply open up the morning newspaper and see how he did the night before.

It would be a kind gesture on the part of the Democrat candidate to allow that unprecedented format change to occur.
Perfectly delivered by a card-carrying member of the leftist party of anti-discrimination, compassion, equality and fair play.

Maybe they should serve watermelon and fried chicken after the debate, huh?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2008, 06:23 AM
GoSlash27's Avatar
GoSlash27 GoSlash27 is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Iowegia, USA
Posts: 926
usa us iowa
GoSlash27 is a splendid one to beholdGoSlash27 is a splendid one to beholdGoSlash27 is a splendid one to beholdGoSlash27 is a splendid one to beholdGoSlash27 is a splendid one to beholdGoSlash27 is a splendid one to beholdGoSlash27 is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 5,055
Default

The debates between Obama and McCain are going to look something like this:

HOWEVER...

Keep in mind that Kerry cleaned Dubya's clock in the debates last time around and we all see how that turned out.
__________________
"Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain"- Iowa state motto
Quote:
Sorry, But Obama is not going to win. You can bank on that, and it's not my fault
that the liberal media paints you a false picture. as proof, check with me on the 5th
-Proof-hunter

Ventura/ Paul '12
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2008, 06:59 PM
Raharu Haruha's Avatar
Raharu Haruha Raharu Haruha is offline
Banned
Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,276
Raharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to beholdRaharu Haruha is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 13,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewster View Post
I find your argument about the late time of the debates to be absolutely hilarious. Perhaps his tiredness should be displayed... what if some emergency happens after 7pm IF he becomes president?:-p Can America afford a "senior moment" during an emergency?

In all honesty though this thread must just be a joke, and u put a smile on my face. Well played.
You know that commercial that Hillary put out that said "It's 3 am and your children are asleep, who do you want answering the phone in time of crisis?" Well, if McCain goes to be at 7pm, he'll be well rest to answer the phone at 3am.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2008, 07:07 PM
L337SIMBA's Avatar
L337SIMBA L337SIMBA is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Age: 17
Posts: 1,081
canada ca ontario
L337SIMBA is just really niceL337SIMBA is just really niceL337SIMBA is just really niceL337SIMBA is just really nice
Credits: 3,724
Send a message via AIM to L337SIMBA Send a message via MSN to L337SIMBA
Default

I don't enjoy your attacks on McCain. That would be like someone saying "The times for the presidential debates should be fit according to Obama's muslim prayers".

I'll watch the presedential debates as long as they aren't scripted like the primaries...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2008, 07:10 PM
Joe1991's Avatar
Joe1991 Joe1991 is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,987
usa us texas
Joe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond reputeJoe1991 has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 44,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoSlash27 View Post
The debates between Obama and McCain are going to look something like this:
oh yea! I replayed that part of Collateral a hundred times, very cool.

I think after the first debate we'll see something like this for McCain from the republicans:

__________________
Obama/Biden 2008
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2008, 08:25 PM
Tuatara's Avatar
Tuatara Tuatara is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 1,163
micronesia au tasmania
Tuatara is a splendid one to beholdTuatara is a splendid one to beholdTuatara is a splendid one to beholdTuatara is a splendid one to beholdTuatara is a splendid one to beholdTuatara is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 5,729
Default

The debates are a farce. All questions are pre-screened and scripted by the two parties themselves, no third parties are allowed, minuscule time limits and tight control of the debates themselves. No real thought provoking questions will be asked or answered. As author George Farah puts it "These staged recitations make a mockery of free and fair presidential elections."
Quote:
Supposedly nonpartisan, the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) is controlled by the Republican and Democratic parties, its board of directors packed with powerful insiders who are beholden to the interests of big business. No Debate details how, with each election cycle, representatives of the two parties draft a “Memorandum of Understanding” and require the commission’s agreement before their candidates will participate. These memoranda typically exclude third-party challengers and prohibit candidate-to-candidate dialogue and cross-examination. Such rules moved former CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite to write in 1998 that “The debates are part of the unconscionable fraud that our political campaigns have become . . . the candidates participate only with the guarantee of a format that defies meaningful discourse.”...
The major party candidates could sponsor their own presidential debates if they wanted to control them. They could hold debates in their living rooms, exclude all third party challengers, employ dreary formats, and ignore difficult issues. Accordingly, if the major party candidates hosted their own debates, they would be held accountable for them. Voters would blame the Republican and Democratic nominees for the lack of authentic discussion, the exclusion of popular third-party challengers, and the avoidance of pressing national issues. The major party candidates would likely pay a price on Election Day. To avoid such accountability, the major party candidates participate in the CPD's deceptive debates.
http://www.sevenstories.com/Book/ind...58322100234970
__________________
America's Enemies Are Not Mine

All wars represent a failure of diplomacy

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” - Stephen Roberts.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2008, 05:10 AM
L337SIMBA's Avatar
L337SIMBA L337SIMBA is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Age: 17
Posts: 1,081
canada ca ontario
L337SIMBA is just really niceL337SIMBA is just really niceL337SIMBA is just really niceL337SIMBA is just really nice
Credits: 3,724
Send a message via AIM to L337SIMBA Send a message via MSN to L337SIMBA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuatara View Post
The debates are a farce. All questions are pre-screened and scripted by the two parties themselves, no third parties are allowed, minuscule time limits and tight control of the debates themselves. No real thought provoking questions will be asked or answered. As author George Farah puts it "These staged recitations make a mockery of free and fair presidential elections."

http://www.sevenstories.com/Book/ind...58322100234970
GRRRR > THat's exactly what I don't want to see. Those kinds of debates are pointless...I've participated in a few prepared debates before.

And yes, they do make a mockery of the presedential candidates and the elections...I want to see which one of the candidates and hold their ground better in an IMPROMPTU debate (well they'll kind of know the topics but..)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2008, 05:28 AM
0000's Avatar
0000 0000 is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 898
0000 is a jewel in the rough0000 is a jewel in the rough0000 is a jewel in the rough
Credits: 3,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco View Post
We could propose allowing the Republican candidate to simply go ahead and retire at his usual 7pm bedtime.
what if the nation suffers from a foreign military attack after 7pm?
__________________
~0000~

Don't confuse me with the facts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Presidential Debates Greco Political Opinions & Beliefs 11 06-04-2008 12:51 PM
Afternoon Open Thread: The Pope, Protests, and Presidential Debates SeminalBlog Political Blogs 0 04-17-2008 12:20 PM
Debates not done DuH2 Current Events 32 02-13-2008 10:23 PM
Democratic presidential debates bushndick Elections & Campaigns 5 04-27-2007 01:38 PM
The Debates EiregoSod Elections & Campaigns 17 06-25-2004 07:03 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden