http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...20Fact%20Check

This article was brought up on another forum i go to. I thought it was short and sweet and speaks volumes.

This article, nor bushs speech as far as i know, did not mention anything about what share of the cost of the "war" the allies are covering.

logosoco:

Thanks for posting the article.

And yes, what American should be focused on is the record of the current President.

Why has he failed to even mention the name of Osama bin Laden? You can count on 1 hand the number of times Bush has publicly mentioned the name "Osama" in the past 2 years.

What is up with that? Could it be that George Bush Sr. was having a business meeting with a member of Osama's immediate family in Washington D.C. on Sept. 11th, 2001?

Why send 10,000 troops into Afgan. to find Osama and a whopping 140,000 troops into Iraq to find Saddam?

Who was and still is the most critical threat to the American people?

Can we possible be gullible enough to believe that this Administration are leading the fight on terrorism and making America safer?

Let's face it, with the direction of the current adminstration we are going in the wrong direction and picking up speed...

..Good Article, LOGO...

The question that no Bush supporter has answered is: HOW DO WE PAY FOR THE "HONEY-DO LIST"?

No-one has addressed that..And they can't. Remember we have to get out of the half trillion dollars in the "red" first.

Congress will probably be asked for more money for IRAQ before the year's end and I wonder where that will come from. Bush may have to "take" back the tax-cut he gave to the 1%. adopt Kerry's plan.. (I doubt he will)