Another family values Republican hypocrite in gay scandal - Page 19

SpankyTheWhale · #**181** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farmer_fred

One person's devient [sic] behavior is another person's opportunity to mind their own (*)(*)(*)(*)ing business.

It's not the closeted part that rankles me, it's the fact that this tool, like Rev Ted before him, spent so much time (*)(*)(*)(*)ing homosexuals for the same behavior, except they weren't so self-loathing about it.

Why is it your or Troy's business what any two consenting adults do behind closed doors?

How you twist this into some attack on alleged Socialists is beyond me. Wouldn't the true conservative/libertarian approach be to STFU? Privacy and the pursuit of happiness and all that?

F Reagan for inviting the Jesus freaks into the Republican tent and giving their wack-job ideas the appearance of credibility.

Let's just say, for the sake of argument, that you are a guy who has staunchly opposed grand larceny for the entirety of your adult life. Then let's say that one day, you broke into a museum and committed grand larceny yourself. Does that make grand larceny any less wrong, or your arguments against it any less valid?

Rusticus · #**182** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bushfan

What this Advocate of Social Science .

I am a proud member of the social group, "Advocates of Social Science." And I want to thank you for your consistency in advertising our group even though you probably wouldn't fit in. Are you trying to ingratiate yourself with us? We are a group of very bright people who value many human family values, ethical values and progressive values. However, and I'm going out on a limb here, I think most of our members are tolerant enough to even accept you.

A request? I shouldn't impose as you are already doing us a service. Could you say a little about our values with the plugs you are giving us. If it wouldn't be too much trouble.

Quote:

wants to avoid admitting is that they are ADVOCATES OF THE NORMALIZATION OF DEVIENT SEX; LOWERING

What you are discussing falls with the boundaries of normal human sexuallity. Reality is soooo hard for you, isn't it.

Quote:

THE CULTURAL THRESHOLDS AND THEIR ONLY CONCERN HERE IS THAT THIS PERV WAS "CLOSETED."
They're not concerned about the perversion, the devient behavior; they're ONLY point is that the perv has in his past, correctly taken the position that the behavior he was practicing is dangerous cultural destroying behavior; from THIS, these people want to project the erroneous premise that the position advocating normalizing the perverted behavior is somehow buoyed, when those that correctly stand against it are found humiliating themselves, their family and their nation, by having failed to maintain high standards and not succumbed to the base sexual desire to engage in twisted devient sex.

Are you familiar with the line from Shakespeare which I will paraphrase as, "Methinks the man doth protest too much"?

Quote:

That this perv has failed himself, his family and his country by lowering himself into the bowels of sexual depravity, hardly promotes the idiocy that such should be normalized.

Do you really have any feelings about this or are you showing us how good you are at painting a verbal picture. YOU ARE VERY GOOD!

Quote:

It does however prove that socialism and the socialists that advocate for it, are nothing beyond one long line of deceit.

Please write again. Answering your posts is one of my guilty pleasures

catalinacat · #**183** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpankyTheWhale

Let's just say, for the sake of argument, that you are a guy who has staunchly opposed grand larceny for the entirety of your adult life. Then let's say that one day, you broke into a museum and committed grand larceny yourself. Does that make grand larceny any less wrong, or your arguments against it any less valid?

That's the thing - these repugs that get caught with their pants down with other men - all of them have staunchly and piously attacked the gays.
It's their hypocrisy that is so disgusting. How many of 'em are out there anyway?

catalinacat · #**184** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:15 AM

[quote=justabubba;618187]what is it with these republicans marrying women that turn them gay?[/QUOTE

THAT is funny

farmer_fred · #**185** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpankyTheWhale

Let's just say, for the sake of argument, that you are a guy who has staunchly opposed grand larceny for the entirety of your adult life. Then let's say that one day, you broke into a museum and committed grand larceny yourself. Does that make grand larceny any less wrong, or your arguments against it any less valid?

Nope, but grand larceny is against the law. Being homosexual isn't, in America. It does make the guy in question a major (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hypocrite though.

Troy's arguments against homosexuality and sex toys were never valid.

SpankyTheWhale · #**186** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catalinacat

That's the thing - these repugs that get caught with their pants down with other men - all of them have staunchly and piously attacked the gays.
It's their hypocrisy that is so disgusting. How many of 'em are out there anyway?

But that's the thing. The hypocrisy is irrelevant because their point is just as valid as it was before.

farmer_fred · #**187** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpankyTheWhale

But that's the thing. The hypocrisy is irrelevant because their point is just as valid as it was before.

Their point was never valid.

SpankyTheWhale · #**188** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farmer_fred

Nope, but grand larceny is against the law. Being homosexual isn't, in America. It does make the guy in question a major (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hypocrite though.

Troy's arguments against homosexuality and sex toys were never valid.

It's only against the law because it's not legal. That doesn't provide a moral distinction between what happened and my analogy.

SpankyTheWhale · #**189** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farmer_fred

Their point was never valid.

Now you are shifting the discussion from what happened to your opinion of homosexuality.

farmer_fred · #**190** (**permalink**) 07-18-2008, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpankyTheWhale

Now you are shifting the discussion from what happened to your opinion of homosexuality.

Excuse me? You don't want to consider that glaring hypocrisy of Troy King's actions, and you don't want to consider the merits of his position, so what exactly is your point?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Liberals to blame for Terrorism & Decline in Family Values??	jasonfnorth	Political Opinions & Beliefs	17	07-14-2008 07:45 PM
William "Cold Cash" Jefferson’s Family Values	SweetnessBlog	Political Blogs	1	06-06-2008 12:00 PM
In Defense of Family Values	greatamerican128	Political Opinions & Beliefs	39	10-05-2007 05:16 PM
Republican family values?	chainyanker	Current Events	9	10-22-2006 06:23 PM