nope... don't think that's it. After all, it takes 2 to tango.

What do fetishes have to do with love?

__________________
"Man lives in the sunlit world of that which he believes to be reality. But unseen by most is an underworld, a place that is just as real... but not as brightly lit... A DARK SIDE!"
-opening from Tales From the Darkside

Well perhaps it's the case for withoutjudgement.

__________________
No one who desires power is fit to wield it.
Voila!

because i am seenig no love i resortt to preversion
you happy,
i thank that is it, and you see things as prevrted that you dont understand, it depends on wha tthe preversion is

now sexual diveance, is that hurting someone or non concentual

i think both stem to our (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up society, my dads dad was a huge ass hole, my dads a jerk, and im a fd up no good so and so

ithink if i could get some love i wouldnt be a chronic masturbator, maby thats wishful thinking
and if i could meet a girl that shares my sick preversions id be happy as a clam

__________________
try non-judgement, you wil be happier and healthier,

actually sexual diveance was defined as paraphilia. If that is correct then sexual diviance is not per definition hurting someone or non concentual.

you don't want to come? is that your perversion?

would his penis implode?

__________________
No one who desires power is fit to wield it.
Voila!

This is not entirely accurate. The definitions of deviant and norm actually have two definitions. One is statistic deviation and norm which are essentially math terms to which you are referring. The other has to do with social beliefs of what a society believes what is normal.

This is why you are getting controversy of the term. Nobody cares about the statistical part, but the society part is makes people upset.

As far as whether or not its changed. I think it would be fair to say that in the history of this country, talking about sex in an open manner has not occurred until probably the sixties. If you had a chance to see the movie regarding Alfred Kinsey, who did sexual studies in the 40'w and 50's, you can see that people were not comfortable regarding open information about sex---even as an academic study . Masters and Johnson came along in the 1970's and educated people to recognize that sex itself is a very normal act. There was the concept that all sex was basically sinful in nature.

You still have some religions who believe that the only acceptable sex is for procreation and everything else is perverted.

I think it would be fair to say that attitudes have changed, but I really don't know if behavior actually changed or being more open about discussing it is really the difference. Howard Stern or Dr Ruth wouldn't have existed in the 20's-30's.