Originally Posted by 0000

do you think that unmarried males are effectively required by government to support children that they have out of wedlock?

Originally Posted by 0000

since i'm medically disabled, i will be penalized if i marry a woman who makes more than $20K per year.

if i marry a woman who makes more than $20K per year, i will then be regarded as a dependent upon the wife (as a child is regarded as a dependent upon a parent). the government will then terminate my disability status which will cause me to lose my house that i mortgage. life-sustaining medications will also be terminated if i marry.

lastly, the government will also cause a potential wife to go bankrupt by forcing her to pay any unpaid medical bills of mine, whereby she would be charged $100K annually on a $21K+ salary if she marries me. she would effectively lose her property after i lose mine.

Originally Posted by Zaro

They don't. You put the restriction on yourself, by being greedy.

Originally Posted by heikstheo

Why shouldn't they be?

Originally Posted by heikstheo

Wow! Could you marry a woman who has a good health insurance policy at work?