The Media Thread

[Raharu Haruha]

The purpose of this thread is for those who see a bias in any media to point out and highlight the bias so that we may see which side the media is really on.

I think everyone knows the old claims that 85% of journalists are democratic and most coverage of the campaign is about Obama, but let's forget those petty statistics and point to solid proof. Post news articles that prove that the journalist is biased, and, if we get enough proof, that the entire news station is biased.

Challenge: Find five news articles from any news groups that have a strong biased towards the right or the left and we will call that news biased.

Scoring:

• The news is only biased if it indicates either a strong positive or negative statement.
  
  -ex: John McCain is handsome for his age.
  -
• There must be three more positive statements than negative statements towards a certain party/individual (in the event that the news talks about a certain individual and then goes on to say other things of that same nature about that individual's party you may count one for each the party and for individual.)
  
  -ex: Barak Obama is intelligent, but also a baby eater and hates the military.
  The score would be a biased of one because the positive cancles out the negative.
  -
• Anyone else can score points if they catch something biased in the inverse of what the original poster claimed.
  
  -ex: OP: "this article shows 3 cases where they are biased in favor of Obama"
  challenger: "No, they also said he says "um" a lot."
  -
• A bias towards one party can be canceled out by a bias towards the other party.
  
  -ex: "Barak Obama is a good speaker." is canceled out by "McCain is a good listener."
  -
• A positive for one party is a negative for the other, and vise versa.
  
  -ex: "Barak Obama is a good speaker" is one point for democrats, and "McCain is a racist." is also one point towards democrats.
  -
• This is not limited to the election. I only used those guys for demonstration purposes.

[Raharu Haruha]

The bold red statements are the major biased ones. The ones in bold seem to imply a bias, but that section was either reporting real news in a biased way or not strong enough to make a case.

It wasn’t a television blackout of John McCain; it was worse: split-screen contrasts that at times made it seem as if Barack Obama was on a state visit while back home his opponent chafed at the perks and privileges of an incumbent commander in chief.

On Tuesday, Mr. McCain held a town hall-style meeting in Rochester, N.H. In the shadow of the ancient Temple of Hercules in Amman, Jordan, Mr. Obama solemnly described his vision for peace in the region while standing at a lectern, the Middle East sprawling out behind him. Reporters were cordoned in front of him like the White House press corps — except that an audio snag kept their questions inaudible.

All three cable news networks carried Mr. Obama’s news conference live and in full. They showed only parts of Mr. McCain’s forum and focused mostly on his reaction to Mr. Obama’s statements. Even Fox News broke away from Mr. McCain midevent to cover the rescue of a bear cub wounded in a California fire and nicknamed Lil’ Smokey.

Mr. McCain’s surrogates complained bitterly about the Obama news blitz; on Tuesday the McCain campaign put out a Web video mocking reporters’ doting coverage with a montage of anchors’ gauzy looks and glowing praise set to the tune of the Frankie Valli hit “Can’t Take My Eyes Off You.”

But it’s not pro-Obama bias in the news media that’s driving the effusion of coverage, it’s the news: Mr. Obama’s weeklong tour of war zones and foreign capitals is noteworthy because it is so unusual to see a presidential candidate act so presidential overseas. Mr. Obama looks supremely confident and at home talking to generals and heads of state, so much so that some viewers may find the pose presumptuous — as if Mr. Obama believes that not only is his official nomination at the Democratic convention in August a mere formality, so is the November election.

All three network anchors traveled overseas for one-on-one interviews with Mr. Obama, and that, too, irked the McCain campaign. The CBS anchor, Katie Couric, who had the first encounter on Tuesday, appeared to take the Republican criticism to heart. She interviewed both candidates on her newscast. First, she spoke with Mr. Obama in Amman, and pressed him repeatedly to explain why he still opposes the troop surge now that it is deemed a success, a line of questioning that drove him to the brink of polite exasperation: “Katie,” he replied, “you’ve asked me three different times, and I have said repeatedly that there is no doubt that our troops helped to reduce violence.” She tacked on an interview with Mr. McCain, via satellite. “He would rather lose a war than lose a campaign,” Mr. McCain said of his rival.

Mr. Obama’s stops in Afghanistan, Iraq and Jordan provided arresting video of the candidate being mobbed by American troops, surveying terrain by helicopter alongside Gen. David H. Petraeus and holding talks with Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq and King Abdullah of Jordan. When posing for an official photograph with a foreign leader, Mr. Obama often places his hand paternally on the other man’s arm, subliminally signaling that though a visitor, he is the real host of the meeting.

Touring ruins of the Citadel in Amman, Mr. Obama strode confidently with his jacket crooked over his shoulder in classic Kennedy style. He also practiced statesmanly restraint, telling reporters in Amman that he wouldn’t criticize his opponent while abroad.

Some images are so potent that Fox News, which hammers at Mr. Obama’s lack of foreign policy experience, uses its headline crawls as disclaimers: Shots of his arrival in Iraq were captioned, “Obama in Iraq: Second-Ever Trip There.”

McCain aides haven’t been nearly as creative on his behalf: their stagecraft has been notably unflattering to the candidate. While Mr. Obama was shown striding across military tarmacs and inspecting troops standing at attention, Mr. McCain on Monday was seen being driven around in a golf cart by former President George Bush in the resort town of Kennebunkport, Me. Later, the two men spoke to reporters side by side at a waterfront, and they looked more like fellow members of a Past Presidents’ Club than a party elder passing the torch to his political heir.

CNN even contrasted how the two candidates pronounce Pakistan. (Mr. Obama favors the more international Pahk-ee-stahn; Mr. McCain keeps the a’s flat.)

It’s a very short trip by diplomatic standards, but it’s a long one for television, and every new stop is fraught with opportunities to misspeak or overstep. Many conservatives are gleefully expecting Mr. Obama to make a gaffe in Israel and look effete in France or Britain. On Tuesday, however, it was Mr. McCain who came closest to Europhilia.

Talking about new energy sources in New Hampshire, Mr. McCain said that it took France five years to build a nuclear power plant and complained that in the United States it took 15 years or more. He also acknowledged that Americans did not readily accept France as a role model, saying self-mockingly, “As you know we always want to imitate the French.”

I also want to point out how Ironic it is to write a news article about how much news media coverage Obama is getting and then make the whole article about Obama, and on top of that, they said it wasn't a biased - it was simply the news.

[withoutjudgement]

fox news caling obama, osama repeatedly, oops,
<<< Mod Edit: Profanity >>>
these jackasses on tv pretend they care who is elected, whats the diference to them, they make their pittance either way
they are biased to them selves, enough to kill the innocent

[Raharu Haruha]

Originally Posted by withoutjudgement

fox news caling obama, osama repeatedly, oops,
<<< Mod Edit: Profanity >>>
these jackasses on tv pretend they care who is elected, whats the diference to them, they make their pittance either way
they are biased to them selves, enough to kill the innocent

Lol find some news articles or youtube videos of it. They have to be biased three times in one piece. Also, chopped up youtube videos don't count if they're taken from multiple pieces.