Quote:
Originally Posted by stekim
Kind of hard to judge. In general I'm against targeting an industry for either tax breaks or higher taxes.
|
In my humble opinion, the government should choose a number for the price of gas- a fairly high number and make sure that the price does not go down. In other words the tax will keep the price high and flat even if the price of a barrel of oil goes down. The extra tax can be used to ameliorate the harm that some people will experience from high gas prices. (you know, give MasTequila some extra gas money!)
There are a couple of reasonable arguments for this: the oil companies will do the R.&D to develop the oil resources that are difficult and expensive to access if they know they can make a profit. It is the volatility and uncertainty that impedes progress on new energy sources. The oil companies won't go there if the they calculate that oil prices may drop.
Also, And here is the Libertarian argument which I favor- the government should not choose the technology, the energy "winners", by giving some a tax break here or a rebate there. Then,changing their minds and allowing the whole thing to expire next year with a new administration. This is buggering up the solar industry, as well. The climate for investment is too unstable. That is the biggest problem.
Another thing. The price of oil is not like widgets. It is largely artificial already , it is determined by the cost of extraction/ refinement and taxes. Use the tax system to stabilize the price at high level so that Exxon will find it worthwhile to go after the shale oil in Wyoming (I think that is where it is) and the solar companies know what to expect ....things will happen, then.
I think it is a mistake for Obama to "fume" at oil companies for making money. When they stomp on the rights of indigenous people in Africa and S.America it turns my stomach but the fact that they make money is because they are us.