As long as were talking about bio-fuels, why did the Democrats kill this bill in committee?


A month and four days, that's all that bill had to live. Steny said they would be "encouraging the biofuel market and infrastructure". Guess not. In 2006 the Democrats promised energy independence, does anyone think this is the way to get there? Letting important bill like this die in committee? The bills I've been posting with the Democrat promises were introduced while they were busy launching 300 investigations in the first 100 days. They were trying to get shorty, while important bills like this paramount to our country and their campaign promises slowly starved to death for attention. They argue while Rome burns around them. Partisan politics at its worst.

__________________

If you don't understand my posting, please don't ask. It's already way over your head.

Of course, as it has recently become obvious that the use of biofuels is contributing to increasing food prices due to a global food shortage, politicians maybe don't want to associate themselves with a failed venture.

Does anyone actually eat chipped wood, saw grass and corn stalks, husks and cobs? They are working organisms that will ferment the corn waste products leaving the corn for food production. It will be cellulose, not sugar based. Saw grass needs no fertilizer or pesticides. Everything the Democrats do always ends up a failed venture.

__________________

If you don't understand my posting, please don't ask. It's already way over your head.

I say we figure out how to turn liquified cow dung into gasoline!

__________________
Theodore Lamar Heiks
BA, History/Political Science, Western State College of Colorado, 1984
MBA, Entrepreneurship/Marketing, City University of Seattle, 1993